Hagar Posted March 26, 2018 Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 As I've gotten older, sometimes I'll see a news story I like, and you know, I don't want to think about it too much. If I do, I might have to confront the negatives, or why it's not a good idea. I just want to revel in the goodness of it all. Roll around in the righteousness and give an imaginary high five to whoever had the brilliance or cajones to come up with it. Such it is with this story, from little Malaysia. So before I do think about those negatives (which I know are there), or someone points them out, hats off to that Indonesian country from Evadale, Tx. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted March 26, 2018 Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 Having the gov decide what is fake news...no, thanks. Scary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted March 26, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 11 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Having the gov decide what is fake news...no, thanks. Scary LRF, I'm disappointed in you. Busting my dream bubble of the Feds arresting 90% of the CNN staff. You could've kept it to yourself for another hour or two. Party pooper! LumRaiderFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted March 26, 2018 Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, REBgp said: LRF, I'm disappointed in you. Busting my dream bubble of the Feds arresting 90% of the CNN staff. You could've kept it to yourself for another hour or two. Party pooper! lol...the problem is, you would have to arrest all the low information voters that watch that crap. They're the ones that cause the problem at the polls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted March 26, 2018 Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 30 minutes ago, REBgp said: LRF, I'm disappointed in you. Busting my dream bubble of the Feds arresting 90% of the CNN staff. You could've kept it to yourself for another hour or two. Party pooper! REBgf -- I'm disappointed in you. You are giving 10% of CNN for having truth tellers?! Shame on you! LOL!! Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted March 26, 2018 Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 If a reporter writes an article discounting the Man-Made Global Warming Theory, would this be considered "fake news"? Banning "fake news" is just a different way of advocating for censorship. If censorship is the solution (and it never is), who gets to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who to appoint to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who can appoint? And so on, and so on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted March 26, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 hours ago, Englebert said: If a reporter writes an article discounting the Man-Made Global Warming Theory, would this be considered "fake news"? Banning "fake news" is just a different way of advocating for censorship. If censorship is the solution (and it never is), who gets to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who to appoint to decide what is fake? Who gets to decide who can appoint? And so on, and so on. Oh, I know the Pandora's Box, but I just wanted to enjoy the thot for a moment. But IF it ever came to past, who would decide what is fake? Why me of course Englebert 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.