Jump to content

Syria

BS Wildcats

By BS Wildcats
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted

There are no guarantees this mission was successful, unless you want to count how this mission has become a distraction to Trump's domestic issues. 

Trump >"Mission accomplished." Sounds very familiar doesn't it? Oh yeah, George Bush said it after Shock & Awe. And we know how that turned out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

There are no guarantees this mission was successful, unless you want to count how this mission has become a distraction to Trump's domestic issues. 

Trump >"Mission accomplished." Sounds very familiar doesn't it? Oh yeah, George Bush said it after Shock & Awe. And we know how that turned out. 

I see you have been intently glued to your Left wing propaganda machine while simultaneously accusing others of only getting information from biased sources. Embarrassed yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Recent bombing of Syria is a classic wag the dog move.

Are you and BLUEDOVE3 watching the same channel? Y'all might want to expand your horizons and find a better source. Better yet, open your eyes to real-world events not based on biased political motivations. A country used chemical weapons, and your response is that the punishment served is just a self-serving political move. Do you actually think France and Britain joined in the airstrikes because they want to help Trump distract the sheeple from the Mueller probe? Are you as embarrassed as BLUEDOVE3 should be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

Maybe we are all missing the big picture here. I recall isis saying they want the end of the world as we know it to happen in Syria. Their plan was to get the world powers involved going against each other, the world would end and they get the spoils. Are we playing into their hand? Let me know if I got my wires crossed.

BTW, I agree with the bombing of that animal Assad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, baddog said:

Maybe we are all missing the big picture here. I recall isis saying they want the end of the world as we know it to happen in Syria. Their plan was to get the world powers involved going against each other, the world would end and they get the spoils. Are we playing into their hand? Let me know if I got my wires crossed.

BTW, I agree with the bombing of that animal Assad.

Dang, I'm beginning to sound like Kountzer with the doom and gloom question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

Guess obama didn't have the "peanuts" to wag the dog.  Assad pretty much knew that obama was a fraud and he wouldn't do anything if he crossed that line.

 

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

Are you and BLUEDOVE3 watching the same channel? Y'all might want to expand your horizons and find a better source. Better yet, open your eyes to real-world events not based on biased political motivations. A country used chemical weapons, and your response is that the punishment served is just a self-serving political move. Do you actually think France and Britain joined in the airstrikes because they want to help Trump distract the sheeple from the Mueller probe? Are you as embarrassed as BLUEDOVE3 should be?

Of course France and Britain didn't participate due to Trump's domestic problems. But Trump did. Those countries participated because they are allies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Englebert said:

I see you have been intently glued to your Left wing propaganda machine while simultaneously accusing others of only getting information from biased sources. Embarrassed yet?

Embarrassing is this administration. Payoffs, numerous criminal indictments, porn stars, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Embarrassing is this administration. Payoffs, numerous criminal indictments, porn stars, etc. 

How many criminal indictments have anything to do with Trump?

How about lying to the face of the American people, Russian propaganda payoffs, interns, weaponizing government agencies, rigging elections, accusing the Amercian government of attacking another government based solely as a distraction, etc. Your outraged is based solely on political affiliation. It is abundantly clear who should be embarrassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Englebert said:

How many criminal indictments have anything to do with Trump?

How about lying to the face of the American people, Russian propaganda payoffs, interns, weaponizing government agencies, rigging elections, accusing the Amercian government of attacking another government based solely as a distraction, etc. Your outraged is based solely on political affiliation. It is abundantly clear who should be embarrassed.

One of the sub topics introduced on this thread was how Trump is an embarrassment. Thanks for listing. FYI: I've voted Republican and some of my best friends are Republicans. But Trump!!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

One of the sub topics introduced on this thread was how Trump is an embarrassment. Thanks for listing. FYI: I've voted Republican and some of my best friends are Republicans. But Trump!!!! 

We have been asking for over a year now for the snowflakes to list the reasons why they think Trump is an "embarrassment". And we are still waiting. But we now have plenty of evidence of why Liberals are an embarrassment filled to the brim with hypocrisy. Please, would you care to expound on your reasons. Please keep in mind that the values you list must hold the same connotation when applied to others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Embarrassing is this administration. Payoffs, numerous criminal indictments, porn stars, etc. 

6 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Embarrassing is this administration. Payoffs, numerous criminal indictments, porn stars, etc. 

No porn stars during this administration, it was before.  Have you forgotten what went on during Clinton era?  I'm sure that was ok with you.  The name was Monica Lewinsky to jar your memory.  Let's not act like Trump is the only POTUS to have issues during their presidency.  You just want to bash Trump to try to disguise the horrendous eight years that obama gave us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Englebert said:

Are you and BLUEDOVE3 watching the same channel? Y'all might want to expand your horizons and find a better source. Better yet, open your eyes to real-world events not based on biased political motivations. A country used chemical weapons, and your response is that the punishment served is just a self-serving political move. Do you actually think France and Britain joined in the airstrikes because they want to help Trump distract the sheeple from the Mueller probe? Are you as embarrassed as BLUEDOVE3 should be?

Looking at real world events there is no shortage of heinous crimes against humanity that deserve a smart missile or two, or twenty or thirty.  I just think 45 picked this one to boost morale in his administration because the water is getting hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Looking at real world events there is no shortage of heinous crimes against humanity that deserve a smart missile or two, or twenty or thirty.  I just think 45 picked this one to boost morale in his administration because the water is getting hot.

Ah, so that's why Britain and France joined in. They also just want to boost morale in the Trump administration. Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

A case of international follow the leader.

A case of a far, far, far fetched conspiracy theory that could eventually get someone barred from owning a firearm. That should be a question on a background check: Do you think countries will agree to bomb another country just so one country can boost morale of his administration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted

I don't feel up to answering your cock eyed questions.  Be gone with that non sense.   I don't think the air strike did much good.  Too little too late.  Assad has powerful allies.  Russia has bombs too.  If the usa has a military answer then put boots on the ground.  anybody can sling a few missiles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Kountzer said:

I don't feel up to answering your cock eyed questions.  Be gone with that non sense.   I don't think the air strike did much good.  Too little too late.  Assad has powerful allies.  Russia has bombs too.  If the usa has a military answer then put boots on the ground.  anybody can sling a few missiles.

You are the one throwing out "cock eyed" statements. We are just sitting back laughing (and not with you). In case you forgot, you are actually accusing other countries of bombing another country just so Trump can boost the morale of his administration. Please give that some thought. It only takes about two functioning brain cells to realize how ridiculous that statement is. So please, keep posting. The Liberal media that you parrot is making you look foolish, and providing us some entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...