Jump to content

UIL Adds Instant Replay to Football State Championships


Recommended Posts

UIL Adds Instant Replay to Football State Championships

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

AUSTIN, TX — The University Interscholastic League will use instant replay at all UIL Football State Championship games beginning in 2018. 

UIL plays football by NCAA rules, and each year the UIL reviews exceptions to NCAA football rules through the UIL Football Rules Committee. UIL will use the NCAA rules for instant replay with two exceptions. There will be no coaches’ challenges. All reviews will be initiated by the replay officials.  Additionally, targeting will not be called as a result of a review. Targeting will only be called by the officials on the field. All reviews will take place in a replay booth, with a collegiate replay official reviewing plays. 

“With all UIL State Championship football games at a single location, we have the technology and ability to utilize these powerful tools to make the state championships the best possible experience for coaches, players, officials and fans,” UIL Executive Director Dr. Charles Breithaupt said. “Instant replay will help ensure that the calls during the biggest games of the year are as correct as possible.” 

Replay will not be permitted during regular season games, or during playoff games prior to the state championship. 

“Because we play football by NCAA rules, which allow for instant replay, we have this opportunity. We are extremely excited to add instant replay to our state championship games,” UIL Director of Athletics Dr. Susan Elza said. “We’ve studied this topic thoroughly, and have had many conversations with officials and coaches. The consensus we’ve heard is that our game is ready for this and it will be a valuable addition.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan
12 hours ago, sportsfan2017 said:

UIL Adds Instant Replay to Football State Championships

Breithaupt said. “Instant replay will help ensure that the calls during the biggest games of the year are as correct as possible.” 

Replay will not be permitted during regular season games, or during playoff games prior to the state championship. 

 

Does anyone really believe this?  Does anyone have any idea how things really work at the UIL? 

It will assuredly morph into the semifinal games, then all playoff games, then eventually all district games. Doesn't anyone remember adding "just" the second place team to the playoffs?

The UIL can't ever leave things well enough alone. They HAVE to tinker each year whether its needed or not.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ECBucFan said:

Does anyone really believe this?  Does anyone have any idea how things really work at the UIL? 

It will assuredly morph into the semifinal games, then all playoff games, then eventually all district games. Doesn't anyone remember adding "just" the second place team to the playoffs?

The UIL can't ever leave things well enough alone. They HAVE to tinker each year whether its needed or not.    

I'm in favor of the replay in the championship game, but not beyond it.

I share ECBucFan's concern about a slippery slope.  I only wonder how long the UIL and its member schools will agree to play one game by one set of rules and the remainder of games by another. 

If all schools had the technology to do so, then the fear of expansion of replay would not be a problem.  However, because of budget constraints, most of the schools in the area are currently unable to upgrade to facilities many feel are necessary to compete and probably will not be able to do so anytime soon.  How do we think we think that schools can afford replay quality video equipment which will ultimately be mandated by the UIL?

And we know that they will ultimately mandate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

I'm in favor of the replay in the championship game, but not beyond it.

I share ECBucFan's concern about a slippery slope.  I only wonder how long the UIL and its member schools will agree to play one game by one set of rules and the remainder of games by another. 

If all schools had the technology to do so, then the fear of expansion of replay would not be a problem.  However, because of budget constraints, most of the schools in the area are currently unable to upgrade to facilities many feel are necessary to compete and probably will not be able to do so anytime soon.  How do we think we think that schools can afford replay quality video equipment which will ultimately be mandated by the UIL?

And we know that they will ultimately mandate it.

I was about to say the same thing about every team having the technology.   If the UIL mandates it, they should pay for it for every school.  They make enough money.   I know there are plenty of schools in Texas that can't afford to do it themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

It will be an unfunded mandate by the UIL. Then, one of two things happen: 1) The schools make their taxpayers cough it up, and expensive camera systems are installed across the state of Texas, because "its required" by the UIL. OR, 2) The UIL forces playoff games be moved to "So-Mo replay ready" stadiums. The  "So-Mo replay ready" stadiums are spelled :"J-E-R-R-Y-S"   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the next step being playoffs only. If the UIL moved it past the state championship game. So that means all the schools would have to play at a College or NFL stadium. Which would make rent higher to pay. But come the second and third round most games are played at nfl and college venues. So the UIL will argue that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan
10 hours ago, navydawg31 said:

 But come the second and third round most games are played at nfl and college venues. So the UIL will argue that. 

Maybe the larger schools, but 4A and down probably not. They mostly play at larger high school stadiums. Texan Drive in New Caney, Galena Park, Waco ISD, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...