Fact Checking The New Socialist Darling!

[LumRaiderFan]

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That’s pretty dadgum presumptuous.

I'm using the term "your world" as Democrat politics and the destruction it has brought on this country and continues to bring. (Call it 40 years of paying attention)

How can you possibly not know anything about your adversary's world?

[UT alum]

15 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Does late term have a different outcome than early term?

It's a very simple yes or no question.

No.

[baddog]

Any woman seeking an abortion should have to view an abortion prior to making her “CHOICE”. 

That is all!!!!!

[UT alum]

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I'm using the term "your world" as Democrat politics and the destruction it has brought on this country and continues to bring. (Call it 40 years of paying attention)

How can you possibly not know anything about your adversary's world?

We’re adversaries? I thought we were both proud members of the same country.

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Any woman seeking an abortion should have to view an abortion prior to making her “CHOICE”. 

That is all!!!!!

Takes a man to make a statement like that.

[baddog]

48 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Takes a man to make a statement like that.

Is that supposed to make me feel bad? I think there are plenty of women who would make the same statement. I bet there are lots of terminated pregnancies where the man wanted the child and the woman didn't. What about his feelings? Legally, it is his kid too and he has rights. I think the supposedly responsible women who scream that it is their “CHOICE” as to whether a human being takes a breath or not ( and now, maybe even after ) why couldn't they be more responsible before having unprotected sex? Talk about irresponsible!!! Life and death situations are left up to these floosies?

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

We’re adversaries? I thought we were both proud members of the same country.

Washington Democrats are without a doubt adversaries that shouldn’t be compromised with, only defeated.

 

[UT alum]

37 minutes ago, baddog said:

Is that supposed to make me feel bad? I think there are plenty of women who would make the same statement. I bet there are lots of terminated pregnancies where the man wanted the child and the woman didn't. What about his feelings? Legally, it is his kid too and he has rights. I think the supposedly responsible women who scream that it is their “CHOICE” as to whether a human being takes a breath or not ( and now, maybe even after ) why couldn't they be more responsible before having unprotected sex? Talk about irresponsible!!! Life and death situations are left up to these floosies?

[UT alum]

13 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Washington Democrats are without a doubt adversaries that shouldn’t be compromised with, only defeated.

 

So, you want one party. Very democratic.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

So, you want one party. Very democratic.

Not sure how you got that...I’m saying at the present time the Democrats want to steam us towards socialism and that being the case, I don’t want to see them succeed.

By the way, I could actually do without the  Democrats, they have no ideas that are good for the country.

[UT alum]

37 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Not sure how you got that...I’m saying at the present time the Democrats want to steam us towards socialism and that being the case, I don’t want to see them succeed.

By the way, I could actually do without the  Democrats, they have no ideas that are good for the country.

That’s how I got it.

[Englebert]

22 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That’s how I got it.

Please explain how you "got it". You made a declaration that LumRaiderFan wants one party. Then you claim that the answer validates your claim. Please explain, because I definitely missed it, how LumRaiderFan is advocating for one party domination based on that answer. Please show the evidence where other parties, or even new parties, are frowned upon in LumRaiderFan's response.

Sorry LumRaiderFan for butting in, but that was such a pathetic retort I couldn't "recuse" myself any longer. (Actually, I haven't been able to monitor the conversations much lately. By the time I get to some of these, you (and others) have already shot them down...and I don't want to be accused of piling on.)

[LumRaiderFan]

34 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That’s how I got it.

If they ever come up with a good idea, I’ll reconsider.

We need two parties to keep each other in check, but the Dems are over the edge.

[LumRaiderFan]

10 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Please explain how you "got it". You made a declaration that LumRaiderFan wants one party. Then you claim that the answer validates your claim. Please explain, because I definitely missed it, how LumRaiderFan is advocating for one party domination based on that answer. Please show the evidence where other parties, or even new parties, are frowned upon in LumRaiderFan's response.

Sorry LumRaiderFan for butting in, but that was such a pathetic retort I couldn't "recuse" myself any longer. (Actually, I haven't been able to monitor the conversations much lately. By the time I get to some of these, you (and others) have already shot them down...and I don't want to be accused of piling on.)

No problem...have at it.

[Englebert]

13 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

No problem...have at it.

I suggest you continue. I undoubtedly will induce a gutter brawl...after all, I aspire to entice one to share (admit) their inner most feelings through less than admirable (Liberal) tactics. You are much better at debating the issue. I would still like UT alum to answer my question though.

[LumRaiderFan]

5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I suggest you continue. I undoubtedly will induce a gutter brawl...after all, I aspire to entice one to share (admit) their inner most feelings through less than admirable (Liberal) tactics. You are much better at debating the issue. 

That’s actually what I was getting at...I’m tired of the attempts to compromise with Democrats (which usually means Republicans cave) and I’m ready for them to engage in an outright gutter brawl.  

[Englebert]

12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

That’s actually what I was getting at...I’m tired of the attempts to compromise with Democrats (which usually means Republicans cave) and I’m ready for them to engage in an outright gutter brawl.  

I came to that same conclusion about two years ago, and decided to fight back with like tactics. It sure drives the Socialists (former Democrat party) mad.

[5GallonBucket]

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Washington Democrats are without a doubt adversaries that shouldn’t be compromised with, only defeated.

 

There is no more democrats. They are extinct/ morphed into this new radical regime.  

[Reagan]

It's my understanding the AOC's new "Green Deal" will eliminate airplanes.  With that, I also understand that she thinks one can hop a train to Europe! 

[stevenash]

59 minutes ago, Reagan said:

It's my understanding the AOC's new "Green Deal" will eliminate airplanes.  With that, I also understand that she thinks one can hop a train to Europe! 

You can't comprehend that because you are not "enlightened".  People with your level of intelligence should not have a say in what takes place in the country.  You are a danger to the "general welfare" of this nation.

[BS Wildcats]

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

It's my understanding the AOC's new "Green Deal" will eliminate airplanes.  With that, I also understand that she thinks one can hop a train to Europe! 

Put her on it!!

[WOSdrummer99]

She could be aware of a secret technology the govt has been hiding from us that will make conventional air travel obsolete.

Every time I think of her I hear the twilight zone theme song

[baddog]

What do you know, college students with more than one functioning brain cell.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[LumRaiderFan]

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Put her on it!!

lol

[LumRaiderFan]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Great move