Reagan Posted January 30, 2019 Author Report Posted January 30, 2019 LOL! You know she must be bad when a Socialist upsets other Socialist!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
PhatMack19 Posted January 30, 2019 Report Posted January 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Reagan said: LOL! You know she must be bad when a Socialist upsets other Socialist!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up On the bright side, she is Twitter famous now. She will be able to get any bartending job she wants after her 2 years is up. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: Institute for Energy Research president Tom Pyle was more blunt: “One hundred percent renewable energy defies the laws of physics. It would be impossible to achieve.” Nevertheless, approximately 70 Democratic lawmakers have so far tentatively endorsed a Green New Deal plan, including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and California Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris.And Paul Bledsoe, a strategic adviser at the Progressive Policy Institute, said progressives were overcompensating. “I understand the value of aspirational goals,” Bledsoe said. “My personal view is, that undermines the credibility of the effort.” It won't work... ...WE DON'T CARE! Quote
BS Wildcats Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: Institute for Energy Research president Tom Pyle was more blunt: “One hundred percent renewable energy defies the laws of physics. It would be impossible to achieve.” Nevertheless, approximately 70 Democratic lawmakers have so far tentatively endorsed a Green New Deal plan, including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and California Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris.And Paul Bledsoe, a strategic adviser at the Progressive Policy Institute, said progressives were overcompensating. “I understand the value of aspirational goals,” Bledsoe said. “My personal view is, that undermines the credibility of the effort.” It won't work... ...WE DON'T CARE! Reminds one of obamacare. Dims knew it wouldn't work, but they were going to push it through come hell or high water. Quote
PhatMack19 Posted February 7, 2019 Report Posted February 7, 2019 Her Green New Deal Plan includes updating or replacing every single building in the country. That sounds easy enough.... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 7, 2019 Report Posted February 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said: Her Green New Deal Plan includes updating or replacing every single building in the country. That sounds easy enough.... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up She also wants to make all air travel obsolete in the future. She is enthusiastic...and quite dumb. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted February 7, 2019 Report Posted February 7, 2019 35 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: She also wants to make all air travel obsolete in the future. She is enthusiastic...and quite dumb. Speaks volumes for those that voted her into office! Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 7, 2019 Report Posted February 7, 2019 10 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Speaks volumes for those that voted her into office! I’m sure it would be great entertainment to ask her voters specifically why they voted for her. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 7, 2019 Report Posted February 7, 2019 45 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: I’m sure it would be great entertainment to ask her voters specifically why they voted for her. I'm sure their reasons would sound a lot like the responses you'd get from a lot Trump voters. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: I'm sure their reasons would sound a lot like the responses you'd get from a lot Trump voters. I doubt anyone that voted for Trump wants to get rid of airplanes. Quote
Hagar Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 13 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: I'm sure their reasons would sound a lot like the responses you'd get from a lot Trump voters. Not even close. She essentially won the election in the primaries against an incumbent Democrat. I suspect her opponent then had an infinitely higher IQ than she, but then again, who doesn’t. A large number of Trump voters did so in order to avoid getting Hillary, who would abuse the presidency even more than she did SOS. Sell our uranium to Russia - had she been elected president, she’d probably sold Texas to Russia. If there’s such a thing as demonic possession, and I believe there is, she appears to have all the symptoms. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel issued a blistering critique of the proposed Green New Deal, saying that the proposal reads like a parody of the Democratic Party done by Republicans. “By the end of the Green New Deal resolution (and accompanying fact sheet) I was laughing so hard I nearly cried,” Strassel wrote on Twitter. “If a bunch of GOPers plotted to forge a fake Democratic bill showing how bonkers the party is, they could not have done a better job. It is beautiful.” Quote
Reagan Posted February 8, 2019 Author Report Posted February 8, 2019 I say -- keep talking! This is going to be fun to watch. Watching the Democrat party cannibalize itself is quality entertainment! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted February 8, 2019 Author Report Posted February 8, 2019 Is the so-called Green Deal just a Trojan horse for Communism?! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Hagar said: Not even close. She essentially won the election in the primaries against an incumbent Democrat. I suspect her opponent then had an infinitely higher IQ than she, but then again, who doesn’t. A large number of Trump voters did so in order to avoid getting Hillary, who would abuse the presidency even more than she did SOS. Sell our uranium to Russia - had she been elected president, she’d probably sold Texas to Russia. If there’s such a thing as demonic possession, and I believe there is, she appears to have all the symptoms. Trump beat out something like 2 dozen more experienced politicians (and Carly Fiorina and Dr Ben Carson) to win the Republican nomination. If you go back to the first debate, there were at least 15 guys on that stage that were better prepared to lead the nation. Anybody that argues any differently is probably not worth debating. Here's my opinion. I was surprised when the Dems selected Obama in 08 with so limited qualifications. I was flabbergasted in 2012 when he was re-elected despite really accomplishing nothing except speeding up the implosion of the healthcare system. I really felt like the Ds had harnessed the "stupid" vote and would continue to get re-elected over and over again. The Rs proved in 2016 that the Ds haven't locked up the uninformed vote just yet. The scary part is that I'm afraid it's a trend and we can only expect more of the same. You go from somebody like Bill Clinton (first to have NOT served in the military, but played a decent sax) to GWB who was a great guy but honestly probably not the best Commander in Chief we've ever had, to the coolest pres ever in Obama, to Trump. The next step is gonna be a big one, and I'll be surprised if it isn't a cross-dressing wanna-be punk rocker from El Paso or some other whack-a-doodle who spouts off all of the benefits of socialism... like our fathers and grandfathers didn't fight wars (hot and cold) to stop it in the last 50 years. TxHoops and Hagar 2 Quote
UT alum Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: Trump beat out something like 2 dozen more experienced politicians (and Carly Fiorina and Dr Ben Carson) to win the Republican nomination. If you go back to the first debate, there were at least 15 guys on that stage that were better prepared to lead the nation. Anybody that argues any differently is probably not worth debating. Here's my opinion. I was surprised when the Dems selected Obama in 08 with so limited qualifications. I was flabbergasted in 2012 when he was re-elected despite really accomplishing nothing except speeding up the implosion of the healthcare system. I really felt like the Ds had harnessed the "stupid" vote and would continue to get re-elected over and over again. The Rs proved in 2016 that the Ds haven't locked up the uninformed vote just yet. The scary part is that I'm afraid it's a trend and we can only expect more of the same. You go from somebody like Bill Clinton (first to have NOT served in the military, but played a decent sax) to GWB who was a great guy but honestly probably not the best Commander in Chief we've ever had, to the coolest pres ever in Obama, to Trump. The next step is gonna be a big one, and I'll be surprised if it isn't a cross-dressing wanna-be punk rocker from El Paso or some other whack-a-doodle who spouts off all of the benefits of socialism... like our fathers and grandfathers didn't fight wars (hot and cold) to stop it in the last 50 years. Nah, it’ll be a Biden/Harris ticket is my bet. Quote
stevenash Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Nah, it’ll be a Biden/Harris ticket is my bet. Will that ticket have your support? Quote
UT alum Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, stevenash said: Will that ticket have your support? Yep Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 9 minutes ago, UT alum said: Yep What are the top three policies that you like about them? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: Trump beat out something like 2 dozen more experienced politicians (and Carly Fiorina and Dr Ben Carson) to win the Republican nomination. If you go back to the first debate, there were at least 15 guys on that stage that were better prepared to lead the nation. Anybody that argues any differently is probably not worth debating. Here's my opinion. I was surprised when the Dems selected Obama in 08 with so limited qualifications. I was flabbergasted in 2012 when he was re-elected despite really accomplishing nothing except speeding up the implosion of the healthcare system. I really felt like the Ds had harnessed the "stupid" vote and would continue to get re-elected over and over again. The Rs proved in 2016 that the Ds haven't locked up the uninformed vote just yet. The scary part is that I'm afraid it's a trend and we can only expect more of the same. You go from somebody like Bill Clinton (first to have NOT served in the military, but played a decent sax) to GWB who was a great guy but honestly probably not the best Commander in Chief we've ever had, to the coolest pres ever in Obama, to Trump. The next step is gonna be a big one, and I'll be surprised if it isn't a cross-dressing wanna-be punk rocker from El Paso or some other whack-a-doodle who spouts off all of the benefits of socialism... like our fathers and grandfathers didn't fight wars (hot and cold) to stop it in the last 50 years. Ah, yes, that's what we needed, another experienced politician. I'm sure with all their experience they would have picked better SCJs, renegotiated NAFTA better, given us better across the board tax cuts, cut many more Obama era regulations, and gotten the economy jump-started much better than Trump has. Yes, I'm sure that's it, we need a seasoned GOP candidate that would have done a much better job...just ask the GOP, they'll tell you. Hagar, CardinalBacker and baddog 3 Quote
stevenash Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 53 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: What are the top three policies that you like about them? 1.. they hate Trump 2. They hate Trump 3. They hate Trump LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
UT alum Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said: What are the top three policies that you like about them? Universal healthcare Environmental protection Support collective bargaining for labor Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 55 minutes ago, UT alum said: Universal healthcare Environmental protection Support collective bargaining for labor I don’t agree but respect your opinion. Thanks for an answer. On the road, will pick up discussion later. Quote
UT alum Posted February 8, 2019 Report Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: I don’t agree but respect your opinion. Thanks for an answer. That’s all one could ask. Thanks. Quote
Hagar Posted February 9, 2019 Report Posted February 9, 2019 Here’s my problem with any Govt run HC. If we’re all under GRHC, we’ve essentially lost our Freedom. Your HC will be available at the will of the Govt. Think about that. There’s a quote, I don’t know the author but I’ll just paraphrase, Govt run HC will invariably reduce coverage to offset cost. Some hospitals in Great Britain are delaying treatment for the obese and smokers for up to 6 months. So if we’re under GRHC, what freedoms have we lost? Virtually everyone needs HC at one time or another. So our Govt delays HC to the obese & smokers. Currently, OCortez has proposed that in 10 years we only use alternate energy sources, no longer have airplanes and a surcease to eating meat (and a ton of other things). So if you’re a meat eater you could be restricted. It could, and would, get worse. You own a gun? Turn your gun in or your whole family will be refused HC. If you think that’s absurd, you’re not familiar with the current Dem Party. Or 10 years from now some right wing nut job may take over and use this power. IMO, that’s entirely to much power to put in the hands of any government. If anyone can refute what I’ve posted, please do. The thought of it scares the poo out of me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.