Jump to content

Huffman @ Splendora


urgf

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, urgf said:

Game of the week in 4A- District 11. 

Splendora enters 6-1 on the season, but I noticed they have played many backup QBs on their schedule (Liberty, LCM, Kashmere). Does the trend continue? Rumors Huffman QB was injured late against Bridge City. 

Injury bug going around. I think we lost our starting running back last night. Huffman and Splendora should be another good game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only watch a little film on Splendora,  but that's gonna change this week.  Preliminary looks like they are just like us but bigger..  If this week we can put a entire game together it might be a pretty good competitive game. Offense is getting better every week, just gotta get these stupid mistake/miscues down.  Cant wait till Friday..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Huffman Hargrave Falcons72 said:

Only watch a little film on Splendora,  but that's gonna change this week.  Preliminary looks like they are just like us but bigger..  If this week we can put a entire game together it might be a pretty good competitive game. Offense is getting better every week, just gotta get these stupid mistake/miscues down.  Cant wait till Friday..

there #10 is a play maker. There Qb throws a accurate ball. We could not run them but we have lacked a running game all year. We throw the almost every down 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be a shootout, Huffman is the best team Splendora has played all year.

Both have played Liberty with Huffman losing and Splendora winning. I don’t know much about Splendora but if their D can cover they have a good shot at winning cause Huffman will throw it a lot as well as Splendora. With that being said Huffman wins 41-38. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2018 at 0:24 PM, urgf said:

Game of the week in 4A- District 11. 

Splendora enters 6-1 on the season, but I noticed they have played many backup QBs on their schedule (Liberty, LCM, Kashmere). Does the trend continue? Rumors Huffman QB was injured late against Bridge City. 

This true?  Splendora played a bunch of back up Qb's so far?  Is the Huffman QB injured?  I thought he played Friday night?  Anyone know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PlayActionPass said:

This is going to be very tight football game. Both teams have a lot on the line.

Can Huffman's Defense hold up to the power running game of Splendora?

Can Splendora cover the Huffman receiving corps?

Who has the better kicker/Special Teams?

That's what Lumberton did, power run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts on this game are much the same as the Lumberton/Huffman game. Outcome will be decided by the success of the Huffman passing game.

Completion percentage has been roughly 50/50 all year.  O line has protected the QB pretty well most of the time.   QB has a good arm and typically has a receiver open every play.  Keys here will be bumping completions up to 60-65% and QB feeling pressure early enough to make a safe incomplete pass or running if it's there.  Do those two things and Huffman puts up 30-40 points.

Splendora has a consistent offense and will put up 24-30 points against a pretty salty Falcon defense. 

With that said, I missed my Splendora pick last week so I will err on the the side of statistics and take them by 4 in a close one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 85LHSTAMU89 said:

Thoughts on this game are much the same as the Lumberton/Huffman game. Outcome will be decided by the success of the Huffman passing game.

Completion percentage has been roughly 50/50 all year.  O line has protected the QB pretty well most of the time.   QB has a good arm and typically has a receiver open every play.  Keys here will be bumping completions up to 60-65% and QB feeling pressure early enough to make a safe incomplete pass or running if it's there.  Do those two things and Huffman puts up 30-40 points.

Splendora has a consistent offense and will put up 24-30 points against a pretty salty Falcon defense. 

With that said, I missed my Splendora pick last week so I will err on the the side of statistics and take them by 4 in a close one. 

If it weren't for Lumbertons' secondary Huffman would have put the game away. The interceptions our guys made coupled with the pass into double coverage that somehow ended up in our receivers hands were what gave us the win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, raideroldtimer said:

If it weren't for Lumbertons' secondary Huffman would have put the game away. The interceptions our guys made coupled with the pass into double coverage that somehow ended up in our receivers hands were what gave us the win.

I think the Huffman Offensive Coordinator gave yall that game.  The lack of a 4 minute offense (which they should have been running the whole second half) was the difference. Huffman didn't neeed to score in the second half, they just needed to play keep away. When you have a lead like they did, any drive that ends in a kick is a good drive. If they would have run the ball in the second half then Lumberton would have had no shot at coming back, IMO.

But, Splendora has a a balanced attack and should be able to take advantage of whatever the Huffman defense gives them. The difference will be if Splendora can cover the Huffman receiver or if the Huffman QB can throw it to the right color jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huffman only throws the ball to #10 I think.  90 % of the time . A slant every now and then, but mostly it's a fade route on the twin receiver side. All Lumberton did was move the safety over the top in the 2nd half.  Huffman continued to throw the same route.  Interception after interception.  Bad play calling. Huffman should've never lost to Lumberton after being up 24-7 at half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Coach #23 said:

Huffman only throws the ball to #10 I think.  90 % of the time . A slant every now and then, but mostly it's a fade route on the twin receiver side. All Lumberton did was move the safety over the top in the 2nd half.  Huffman continued to throw the same route.  Interception after interception.  Bad play calling. Huffman should've never lost to Lumberton after being up 24-7 at half.

If Huffman threw the ball to one guy that could be a difference against Splendora. We threw the ball to 4 different receivers which Spendora was having problems covering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...