Jump to content

***UIL Considering Radical Football Realignment Plan***


Recommended Posts

I've read posts that if they UIL approves this plan, only two teams from each district would advance to the playoffs.  Why not 4 teams?  Currently there are 32 districts and two teams advance in the small division and 1 in the large division (2 for 5A).  So that is a total of 64 small division teams in the playoffs (32 districts X 2 teams).  Under this new plan there will be 16 districts so why wouldn't 4 teams be in the playoffs (16 X 4 = 64). 

The UIL wants more teams in the playoffs not less, because they get 15% off the top of the gate receipts from playoff games.  I would be very surprised if the UIL reduces the number of playoff games. 

Also in reviewing some of the projections of new district alignments and the travel, it seems many of the schools are already playing schools from ajoining districts in non-district games or scrimmages so I don't know that travel will be a big issue especially in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This will be voted on soon!!

Shepherd and Coldspring would have to fall somewhere in here.  The bigger district it is an hour drive for any school and up to 3 for some!  Dont see this passing to much money and money is the bottom line.  I could see 4 teams and keep the districts the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

I think it will be fair and I think most of the small schools won mind the extra traveling.

I don't think you understand about small schools. The districts are generally more spread out than the larger classes to begin with. For example, EC has had teams such as Hemphill, Pineland, and, get this: Danbury in the district in the past. I don't want to/can't drive to Schulenburg after work, for example. Though, I know the UIL doesn't give a flip. All they see is $$$$$$$. >:(   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest 3AFan

Why don't you think it would work? It's alot more fair for the smaller schools.

That is absolutly horrible, and would not work. It would not work because of the 7th grade basketball coaches driving on LONG trips on a Tuesday night. Or the 8th grade Volleyball girls having to Cleveland or Splendora from BC or Jasper on a school night. That is stupid, and obviously thought of by people who have no clue of what all coaches have to do, other than football.

I'm sure the parents in Orangefield would love to drive to Coldspring for a Softball game, when BC is 10 miles down the road......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is absolutly horrible, and would not work. It would not work because of the 7th grade basketball coaches driving on LONG trips on a Tuesday night. Or the 8th grade Volleyball girls having to Cleveland or Splendora from BC or Jasper on a school night. That is stupid, and obviously thought of by people who have no clue of what all coaches have to do, other than football.

Thats what im thinking bout, the trips, not only for middle schools but the HS as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 3AFan

Thats what im thinking bout, the trips, not only for middle schools but the HS as well.

In all honesty, IT IS NOT SAFE!!!!! You wouldn't believe how many trips coaches have to drive in BAD weather. Driving a team from Shepherd to Jasper on a Tuesday or Thursday night in the Rain is HARD on a coach who also teaches all week. There is much more of a chance of the WB horror happening when your making schools drive 2 hours for events.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This redistricting shouldn't affect JH or Middle Schools. It may call for a diferent system to be put in place but it shouldn't change JH schedules. I know our junior high doesn't play the same teams our high school does. Our JH is in a district with some new caney/conroe teams, BH, Crosby, all pretty local.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that life isn't all about sports, but really whats a little travel time to make some great memories. These kids will carry the memory of these events for the rest of their life. If this will give smaller schools a chance to go farther and have more success, I say lets do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we all like football fridays but every other sport plays during the school week.  As someone stated it become problematic with some travel especially in January on a long basketball trip when it is raining and or possible freezing.  We gripe here but what would this do to those west Texas towns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sports Cards

I know that life isn't all about sports, but really whats a little travel time to make some great memories. These kids will carry the memory of these events for the rest of their life. If this will give smaller schools a chance to go farther and have more success, I say lets do it.

Personally, If I'm a parent, I don't want my 12 or 13 year old kid, riding in a bus at 11pm on a cold rainy night with a 24year old driving them back from an 8th grade basketball or volleyball game. I've been on trips from Shepherd to Jasper where coaches have literally had to stand up front with a towl, wipping the window, as the other coach drove. Or last year, when we drove through a monsoon getting to Kirbyville from BC for a JV game. It's not safe, no matter how you chalk it up. Smaller schools would have the exact same chance to make the playoff's if you cut down on super districts like 21-3A. Like the other poster posted, only 3 districts have 8 teams in them. That means a majority of teams in 3A only have to be better than 1 or 2 other teams in their district to make the playoffs. Why make people drive 2 hours.... Football wise it'd be no problem..... every other sport.... it would get dangerous. If I were a parent, I'd be fighting it tooth and nail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...