Jump to content

***UIL Considering Radical Football Realignment Plan***


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess that each district committee should go down to the local trophy shop and get each team a little trophy for being "good sports" at the end of each season.  Hey it worked in little league, maybe we can get an ice cream at the Dairy Queen after the game as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I BELIEVE THIS WOULD BE A GREAT PLAN AND HELP THE SMALLER SCHOOLS. ESPECIALLY THE ONES IN 1A - 3A. WHERE THE DIFFERENCE IN NUMBERS IS THE GREATEST. JUST SOUNDS TO ME THAT ALL THE SCHOOLS WITH LARGE NUMBERS WILL MISS BEATING UP ON ALL THE SMALLER SCHOOLS IN THEIR DISTRICTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest maverick24

Being a Lumberton Raider fan I see this in our District Lumberton is the small school in the District and usually is and we have to hear how we have never made the playoffs Not saying that realignment would do that for us but it would be nice to play teams with close to the same enrolment as us. we are around 1,000 and play teams with about 500 more kids than we have. I like it and will drive extra to watch our boys play ball given a chance to compete better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Anytime the UIL gets into changing anything.............follow the money ::).  One way to reduce the number difference in classifications is to add the 6A division.  Playoffs have been watered down since the expansion from the top two teams advancing.  The only place everyone should be a winner is the Special Olympics.  The UIL continues to cheapen the accomplishment of the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest b-a-g fan

What is realy stupid is the diffrence in number enrolment in some schools in one division to the next is as low as 30 and people in the same division as much as 100 . Just because a school is smaller doesnt always give them a disadvantage some schools have huge enrolments but fewer kids with  football interest . For those talking trash on WOS they have been competitive in every classification they have been in .. I went to PNG and they still were on top back then,  I promise Hooks will have his kids ready for what evere comes there way . The key is for  schools  to quit hireing good old boys just because they went to school there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

Anytime the UIL gets into changing anything.............follow the money ::)

Playoffs have been watered down since the expansion from the top two teams advancing. 

The UIL continues to cheapen the accomplishment of the playoffs.

WORD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...