Jump to content

Splendora @ Lumberton / District title on line for both teams


VP93....

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I  have no seen Splendora with my own eyes yet, but I have seen Lumberton.  Anything on Splendora?

Splendora is big and physical. They kind of remind me of Nederland. They have a fast kid that will give Lumberton problems. Don’t kick to number #10. Is Splendora beatable yes but I think it will have to be through the air. There Dline is stout. Bear has a good prediction. Good luck to both teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I think at some point, Splendora will need to pass some to have success.  L-Train11 is right.  Lumberton has the ability to stuff the run.  

Yeah and our secondary has improved since playing Silsbee with getting our SS back from injury. And I don’t see splendora having the overall speed that Silsbee has to expose our pass defense anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Yeah and our secondary has improved since playing Silsbee with getting our SS back from injury. And I don’t see splendora having the overall speed that Silsbee has to expose our pass defense anyway.

I’ll make a wager the #10 from Splendora can out run most of our district in the 100 meter. That kid really impressed me. The full back/H back # 6’0 245lbs and he is a load. Plays d end too. Don’t under estimate them.  Splendora throws ball decent and that is how they scored on us a few times I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, LC-M said:

I’ll make a wager the #10 from Splendora can out run most of our district in the 100 meter. That kid really impressed me. The full back/H back # 6’0 245lbs and he is a load. Plays d end too. Don’t under estimate them.  Splendora throws ball decent and that is how they scored on us a few times I believe. 

Covering one fast player is better than a team full of them, that’s what I meant by the comment. Not underestimating them either, but i think our defense is better than Huffman who held them to 20 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Covering one fast player is better than a team full of them, that’s what I meant by the comment. Not underestimating them either, but i think our defense is better than Huffman who held them to 20 points.

There defense also held them to 6 points. Lumberton gave up how many to Huffman? At the end of the day LCM best Chance to be Co District Champions is for y’all to win. Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LC-M said:

There defense also held them to 6 points. Lumberton gave up how many to Huffman? At the end of the day LCM best Chance to be Co District Champions is for y’all to win. Good luck

24 in the first half, 7 in the second when we finally woke up. That’s on us so no excuses. But we may have made Huffman look a little better than they were and us a lot worse than what we are which makes us the underdogs now. Fine with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LC-M said:

Splendora is big and physical. They kind of remind me of Nederland. They have a fast kid that will give Lumberton problems. Don’t kick to number #10. Is Splendora beatable yes but I think it will have to be through the air. There Dline is stout. Bear has a good prediction. Good luck to both teams

They (Lumberton) better hope splendora isnt  like Nederland, or the L-Train won’t be taking home a DC trophy. And I really want to see Lumberton Win.....maybe I’m biased towards our old district friends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bulldogpower said:

They (Lumberton) better hope splendora isnt  like Nederland, or the L-Train won’t be taking home a DC trophy. And I really want to see Lumberton Win.....maybe I’m biased towards our old district friends. 

I’m saying as a whole Splendora size is Close to Nederland big and physical. I think Nederland would beat Splendora. Nederland is better coached and has better athletes cross the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

24 in the first half, 7 in the second when we finally woke up. That’s on us so no excuses. But we may have made Huffman look a little better than they were and us a lot worse than what we are which makes us the underdogs now. Fine with me.

Everyone uses scores to gauge out teams and I find myself doing the same thing. At the end of the day I think teams match up differently by coaching schemes, players, and by luck honestly. I hope both teams play well and play a good 4 quarters. I wish we had one Stud in our district that would go on a state championship run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Huffman Hargrave Falcons72 said:

Gonna be a good 1.. Lumberton weak against the pass, but strong against the run.  I think overall Splendora has more weapons than Lumberton.. If Lumberton can keep the score low they might wear down the Wildcats. 

Splendora 24

Lumberton 21

Serious question did Splendora impress you how much better they are now? Because in 14-15 season they were awful. They have had a heck of turnaround

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, L-Train11 said:

Covering one fast player is better than a team full of them, that’s what I meant by the comment. Not underestimating them either, but i think our defense is better than Huffman who held them to 20 points.

I would say the other side of that!      Splendora only gave up 6 points to Huffman and y’all gave up 31.  I think their stats in the paper were that they gave up 118 rushing yards and 134 passing yards. This should be a good game!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,229
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aaronhicks
    Newest Member
    Aaronhicks
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I have no issue with that however…. Rick Perry, although seemingly not really popular even with Republicans, was almost impossible to beat. The Texas conservatives just needed that tough, real conservative with an already popular voting base. Someone that has been elected to both Texas state office and federal office.  Boom! In 2010 in steps Kay Bailey Hutchison, a popular sitting US Senator and former Texas Treasurer. So she has been elected, statewide in both a state political position and nationally as a senator. A Rasmussen poll in 2009 showed Hutchison with a 40% to 38% lead over Perry. She had high profile endorsements as did Perry. Hutchison was endorsed by the likes of G H W Bush, Nolan Ryan, Roger Staubach, etc. If people are actually going to listen to endorsements, those are some fairly well thought of people in Texas. Primary day was between Perry, Hutchison and Debra Medina. Hutchison was beaten by Perry 51% to 30% and he got enough votes to avoid a runoff. Obviously, that has no bearing on today. It does show that just because a person is very popular and already elected to national office from Texas such as Kay Bailey Hutchison, it does not ensure a good showing in the polls against an incumbent. It will be interesting for sure. 
    • WOW what a game. just got home, I'm gonna sleep with a big smile all night. PNG QB passes were spot on tonight, lil #17 freshman receiver had huge catches at critical times in the game. # 44 had a couple of huge catches including the 'jump pass' on 4th down for a touchdown.  #4 made big plays at key times on both sides of the ball, he is a beast. #11 played his usual consistent game with big time catches and a couple of good punts and a good job of just falling on a bobbled kick reception. #27 probably had 125 yards or so rushing. The defensive backs did a good job, bending but not breaking including the interception in the end zone. I thought the TH coaches messed up not trying to score with the high power players they have when they got the fumble right before half with 45 seconds or so on the clock and 3 TO left, if they would have scored then it would have broke our backs. I know it was 90 yards to go but they could cover the field in 3 or 4 plays. This is one of the most exciting wins in PNG's long history of exciting wins. Oh yeah kudos to the fans for getting in to the game at key times and in my Opinion making a big difference. 😂
    • To the 41 individuals that picked TH…..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Round 4 here we come!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...