Jump to content

Crosby@Nederland


navydawg31

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, KF89 said:

There was no weakness with Stansbury or Riggs with Nederland secondary. Every pass stansbury caught was under 8 yds in the 1st half becuz he was tackled immediately after short receptions & Ned db’s stepped up & shut down big plays by all png wr’s all nite & intercepted png 2 times  13-24 99yds equals about 7yds a catch compared to about 9 yds a carry by Mr. Johnson even the dumbest coach knows to let Mr. Johnson run becuz the wr’s were not getting it done.  Mr. Stansbury was given what Ned db’s wanted to give them then tightened up coverage on him on 3rd downs which amounts to not much of an advantage .Come on man give credit when credit is due to Ned secondary,Faircloth & his offensive coaches went away from the pass becuz Ned db’s shut it down & Knew Mr. Johnsons running ability was png  best option to win 

I wholeheartedly disagree. This is Cams Stat line that game.

Cameron Stansbury 7-67

There are more to stats than just reading the QB stat line. While he overall passing average was 7 yards, to CAM it was nearly 10.

That means Cam had nearly 10 yards a catch every time HE touched the ball. Ned made an effort to take away Riggs and Hughes which they did very well because Roschon only had 6 other completions in the game. At nearly 10 yards a catch from Stansbury, as you now know, that is nearly a first down every catch. You DONT go away from that. As I said before, you don't go away from what works. If they stay with the pass and Cam has a game as productive in the 3rd and 4th as he did in the first and second, PNG has more first downs, meaning less running on Johnson, and that may open Riggs later. Just if he doubles his catches and yards its a 14 catch 134 yard game. You DO give your DT QB chances to make plays in the passing game so he CAN close with the RUN.

Not trying to take away from Ned, but BF gives you guys games with his decisions. Now if PNG can make a stand on D, none of all what I said matters anyway. Just an observation. Now go beat Crosby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neds D has been solid all year, United, Santa Fe, Dayton and Vidor all had goose eggs on the board at the half, and WOS only points were from their defense, so that's pretty good....but that D will be put to the test the next 2 weeks, I would think Crosby and PNG have the 2 best offenses  in the District.....I think Nederland takes it this week, but Crosby won't make it easy at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jack Da Rabbit said:

I wholeheartedly disagree. This is Cams Stat line that game.

Cameron Stansbury 7-67

There are more to stats than just reading the QB stat line. While he overall passing average was 7 yards, to CAM it was nearly 10.

That means Cam had nearly 10 yards a catch every time HE touched the ball. Ned made an effort to take away Riggs and Hughes which they did very well because Roschon only had 6 other completions in the game. At nearly 10 yards a catch from Stansbury, as you now know, that is nearly a first down every catch. You DONT go away from that. As I said before, you don't go away from what works. If they stay with the pass and Cam has a game as productive in the 3rd and 4th as he did in the first and second, PNG has more first downs, meaning less running on Johnson, and that may open Riggs later. Just if he doubles his catches and yards its a 14 catch 134 yard game. You DO give your DT QB chances to make plays in the passing game so he CAN close with the RUN.

Not trying to take away from Ned, but BF gives you guys games with his decisions. Now if PNG can make a stand on D, none of all what I said matters anyway. Just an observation. Now go beat Crosby!

You lost the game.  Period.  And they don't play again till next week.   Crosby is up next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...