Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the hidden content, please

 

“The 12-5A-DII committee has voted (3-2) for PNG to forfeit win over Crosby due to illegal technology in the press box. Vidor brought the motion. Vidor, Santa Fe and Dayton were three votes against PNG. Indians have not decided if they will appeal to the UIL. #VYPESETX #txhsfb” — Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

“The alleged illegal technology was an iPad”— Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, About a week ago said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

“The 12-5A-DII committee has voted (3-2) for PNG to forfeit win over Crosby due to illegal technology in the press box. Vidor brought the motion. Vidor, Santa Fe and Dayton were three votes against PNG. Indians have not decided if they will appeal to the UIL. #VYPESETX #txhsfb” — Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

“The alleged illegal technology was an iPad”— Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

 

Per UIL rules, you are not allowed to access video until the game has ended.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Per UIL rules, you are not allowed to access video until the game has ended.  

So the PN-G coaching staff was viewing past film of Crosby during game or actually viewing film of the game being played?

Posted

Why wouldn’t they have to also forfeit the Vidor game if they were using it against us and we called them on it? I know we have no chance at playoffs and it wouldn’t matter for us but it would effect all of the other teams.

Posted
9 minutes ago, CCRed said:

That is odd SantaFe voted against PNG. That could adversely effect their chance to get in the playoffs. 

That's integrity, and Santa Fe has it.

4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

So the PN-G coaching staff was viewing past film of Crosby during game or actually viewing film of the game being played?

The rumor is they were watching Crosby's defense formations and how they reacted to in-game plays.

Posted
5 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

So the PN-G coaching staff was viewing past film of Crosby during game or actually viewing film of the game being played?

Sounds like they were watching and reviewing plays and formations of the game they were currently playing..

Posted
4 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Why wouldn’t they have to also forfeit the Vidor game if try were using it against us and we called them on it? I know we have no chance at playoffs and it wouldn’t matter for us but it would effect all of the other teams.

Because it didn't happen during the vidor game

Posted

From what I was told the evidence was brought forth and Vidor made the motion to consider the forfeit; but the game in question was vs Crosby hence why Crosby did not vote...obviously PNG didn't vote either not sure why Barbers Hill didn't vote...the 2 votes the other way were Nederland and Baytown Lee

Posted
6 minutes ago, Matthew328 said:

This doesn't impact things much UNLESS Crosby beats Nederland this week.....

It gives Crosby a few more ways to make playoffs and even get a higher seed.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Matthew328 said:

From what I was told the evidence was brought forth and Vidor made the motion to consider the forfeit; but the game in question was vs Crosby hence why Crosby did not vote...obviously PNG didn't vote either not sure why Barbers Hill didn't vote...the 2 votes the other way were Nederland and Baytown Lee

That’s fair, game came down to the last possession so using any illegal video could have well factored into their win.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Oh I must have read that wrong, Vidor brought the motion but it happened in the Crosby game?

From what I was reading, It was brought up and Vidor made the motion to consider the forfeit. (short version..lol)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...