Jump to content

PNG/rumors


CCbigfan

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

 

“The 12-5A-DII committee has voted (3-2) for PNG to forfeit win over Crosby due to illegal technology in the press box. Vidor brought the motion. Vidor, Santa Fe and Dayton were three votes against PNG. Indians have not decided if they will appeal to the UIL. #VYPESETX #txhsfb” — Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

“The alleged illegal technology was an iPad”— Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, About a week ago said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

“The 12-5A-DII committee has voted (3-2) for PNG to forfeit win over Crosby due to illegal technology in the press box. Vidor brought the motion. Vidor, Santa Fe and Dayton were three votes against PNG. Indians have not decided if they will appeal to the UIL. #VYPESETX #txhsfb” — Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

“The alleged illegal technology was an iPad”— Twitter: @AshlyVYPE

 

 

Per UIL rules, you are not allowed to access video until the game has ended.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CCRed said:

That is odd SantaFe voted against PNG. That could adversely effect their chance to get in the playoffs. 

That's integrity, and Santa Fe has it.

4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

So the PN-G coaching staff was viewing past film of Crosby during game or actually viewing film of the game being played?

The rumor is they were watching Crosby's defense formations and how they reacted to in-game plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Why wouldn’t they have to also forfeit the Vidor game if try were using it against us and we called them on it? I know we have no chance at playoffs and it wouldn’t matter for us but it would effect all of the other teams.

Because it didn't happen during the vidor game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matthew328 said:

From what I was told the evidence was brought forth and Vidor made the motion to consider the forfeit; but the game in question was vs Crosby hence why Crosby did not vote...obviously PNG didn't vote either not sure why Barbers Hill didn't vote...the 2 votes the other way were Nederland and Baytown Lee

That’s fair, game came down to the last possession so using any illegal video could have well factored into their win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...