Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, Hagar said:

Sure makes you wonder what they've uncovered.  

After much in depth research they have uncovered that the election is over and they cannot stop any Trump nominees. 

In fact the big Senate take over lost seats. 

Posted

How about the Great Train Crash.  The train full of Repubs that ran into a Big trash truck that, allegedly, was trying to weave through the barriers.  Big FBI, CIA, DOT, NSA, IRS, DOD and NASA investigation.  And..... Wait for it....... The official results of those investigations is............. what?   

So a train carrying most of the Republican Congress crashes, and we’ve heard...nothing.  And some people make fun of conspiracy theorist?  Hmmmmm.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/24/2018 at 5:25 AM, PhatMack19 said:

Here is some Q/ John Roberts conspiracy stuff.  Makes a lot of sense 

 

This is the hidden content, please

The information in that link aligns with my suspicions.  I suspected when he voted for Obamacare something was rotten in Denmark.  Now it sounds like something was rotten in Ireland.  And yes, it makes a h-lluva lot of sense.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

While many think the SCOTUS is 5-4 Conservative, Imo it’s 4-4-1.  Justice Roberts has taken Ret. Justice Kennedy’s place as the moderate.  His vote saving Obamacare was very questionable, and now he slaps down a tougher law on abortion in Louisiana.  Conservative?  Doesn’t fit my definition of such.

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
2 hours ago, Hagar said:

While many think the SCOTUS is 5-4 Conservative, Imo it’s 4-4-1.  Justice Roberts has taken Ret. Justice Kennedy’s place as the moderate.  His vote saving Obamacare was very questionable, and now he slaps down a tougher law on abortion in Louisiana.  Conservative?  Doesn’t fit my definition of such.

This is the hidden content, please

I never doubted that Roberts would be the moderating voice on the court.  You don't think legislation from the bench is appropriate, unless it's some legislation you don't like.  Roberts' record as a conservative judge is impeccable. Conservative does not mean blindly following a particular ideology, just as liberal does not mean we blindly follow a socialist agenda.  I'll defer to the people on the bench, whether I agree with their decisions or not.

Posted
8 hours ago, UT alum said:

I never doubted that Roberts would be the moderating voice on the court.  You don't think legislation from the bench is appropriate, unless it's some legislation you don't like.  Roberts' record as a conservative judge is impeccable. Conservative does not mean blindly following a particular ideology, just as liberal does not mean we blindly follow a socialist agenda.  I'll defer to the people on the bench, whether I agree with their decisions or not.

I never said, or implied the legislation was inappropriate.  My point was that Roberts is not the conservative everyone makes him out to be.  I’ve seen the court referred to as 5-4, and if RBG retires, it’ll be 6-3.  I don’t agree.

Posted
12 hours ago, Hagar said:

I never said, or implied the legislation was inappropriate.  My point was that Roberts is not the conservative everyone makes him out to be.  I’ve seen the court referred to as 5-4, and if RBG retires, it’ll be 6-3.  I don’t agree.

Well I’ll be dogged. We’ve found a point of common ground.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...