Jump to content

Lumberton vs Henderson


L-Train11

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Icon said:

Henderson beat a very good Crandall team - I pick Henderson by 2 scores 

No Lumberton hate - just my prediction 

It will definitely be considered an upset if Lumberton wins. I think everyone is in agreement that Henderson is the better team. We’ll have to play mistake free and come out firing from the first whistle, and never let up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm showing 50% chance at kickoff.  Little bit of rain on good field turf should not make a difference for either team assuming Henderson will still be going with 12 at QB.

Personnel wise, Wheatley was probably the best looking defense we have seen all year and our O Line handled them just fine as they have all year.  Henderson definitely looks as least as good if not better player for player.  Difference is they are definitely more disciplined and very well coached.  You can tell they have been there done that.  We will definitely have to bring our A+++ game on offense.

Defensively, I think we will be fine.  Other than Jasper, no one has beat us on the ground.  Henderson will bring a little different look and has some big backs but will not have the quickness we saw with Jasper. We will need to win the turnover game get the needle in the middle.

I know the players and coaches have been working hard and we will see nothing less that 110% from them on Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 85LHSTAMU89 said:

I'm showing 50% chance at kickoff.  Little bit of rain on good field turf should not make a difference for either team assuming Henderson will still be going with 12 at QB.

Personnel wise, * Wheatley was probably the best looking defense we have seen all year and our O Line handled them just fine as they have all year.  Henderson definitely looks as least as good if not better player for player.  Difference is they are definitely more disciplined and very well coached.  You can tell they have been there done that.  We will definitely have to bring our A+++ game on offense.

**Defensively, I think we will be fine.  Other than Jasper, no one has beat us on the ground.  Henderson will bring a little different look and has some big backs but will not have the quickness we saw with Jasper. We will need to win the turnover game get the needle in the middle.

I know the players and coaches have been working hard and we will see nothing less that 110% from them on Friday.

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but:

* Were you at the LC-M when the Raiders got pitched a shutout? I would rather face the Wheatley defense than Splendora or LC-M. Wheatley was undisciplined, unmotivated and poorly coached. Good thing for them, so were their Houston area opponents.

** Really? Are you taking into consideration all the injuries? Have you prayed that they don't use their stud WR now QB to throw the ball? Their WR/QB throws more than our QB...

Good luck to the Raiders, but y'all march forward realistically. Don't want any kids reading this thinking they will be just fine... Can they beat Henderson? Maybe. Is it a long shot? Hmmmmm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but:

* Were you at the LC-M when the Raiders got pitched a shutout? I would rather face the Wheatley defense than Splendora or LC-M. Wheatley was undisciplined, unmotivated and poorly coached. Good thing for them, so were their Houston area opponents.

** Really? Are you taking into consideration all the injuries? Have you prayed that they don't use their stud WR now QB to throw the ball? Their WR/QB throws more than our QB...

Good luck to the Raiders, but y'all march forward realistically. Don't want any kids reading this thinking they will be just fine... Can they beat Henderson? Maybe. Is it a long shot? Hmmmmm...

LCM did there job on defense start of the district play imo. Offense let us down lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2018 at 0:00 AM, EnjoyLife said:

Here is a quick rundown on Henderson. Stumbled out of the gate losing to 5A Whitehouse and then 4AD2 champs Pleasant Grove to start the season...then won six in a row...then got smoked by Carthage and lost to 9-2 Van by 1 pt in a game where Henderson turned it over 5 times. Offense has been inconsistent and lost starting QB last week but put up 450 yards offense tonight against a good Crandall team. Defense is pretty darn good especially against the run. 

Crandalls coach should be coaching at HF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...