Jump to content

Fort Bend Marshall 53 Port Neches-Groves 14/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, hookem14 said:

Are you kidding? FBM is really good.    Really Good...They have 6 starters on   offense faster than our fastest guy on    defense. We could literally be the best tackling team in the state and we still don’t hang with this team.

People have a hard time believing when a team is simply better. Always gotta resort to blaming coaches. God forbid we let the players take ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, hookem14 said:

Are you kidding? FBM is really good.    Really Good...They have 6 starters on offense faster than our fastest guy on defense. We could literally be the best tackling team in the state and we still don’t hang with this team.

Yes they’re good and would beat us 10 out of 10 times, but it doesn’t change we’re a poorly  coached defense that can’t tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CCbigfan said:

Even Their Flagg runners all have been clocked at 4.4 speed and they run barefooted lol, Unreal. Crosby met fbm in the second round a couple of years ago and got smacked 42-24

I said the same thing. Those cats can fly.

You can't tackle what you can't touch. Speed kills.

Marshall is just too much. We left at halftime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look most new PN-G would take a masterful game with a lot of self-inflicted mistakes by FBM for us to win. If you are disappointed in this team of Indians then you need to look at yourself. These kids played a great season. I am so happy for the team. Time for them too celebrate a great season. Here is my message to you. PN-G will be a really good team next season. Blake Boast will be a great young QB and he will be here for two seasons. The O -Line will wholly be back next season including the best O lineman in southeast Texas in J Garth. DaeDae will be in the backfield next season with Deslatte all who watches lower school football knows what he can do. The Indians will be a good team again next season and will compete for the first goal of a district championship. I look for a fine Indians team in 2019. Its been a pleasure watching these past three seasons. and the three with Morse as well. The Indians will do as they always do and march on into the next battlefield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...