Report

If I were to do them, it most likely would be 6A-4A, 3A-1A. A top 12. Or could do a 6A-5A, 4A-3A, 2A-1A top 8. The breakdown of the number of teams we cover here are as follows: 6A   8 teams 5A   15 teams 4A    14 teams 3A    21 teams 2A    14 teams 1A     8 teams   If you did two polls, then it would be ranking 37 and 43 teams. If you did three, it would be 23, 35, 22. The problem with doing a ranking that involves three different classifications is folks will always bring up that the smaller schools couldn't beat the larger schools. Most times that is true but that is not what a three classification ranking is about. Some just don't get it.

I say bring them back, 1a-3a, 4a-6a  Do the top 10 then best of rest with 3 of them on the outside looking in 

I would be in favor of bringing back the local rankings. I am sure it’s a pain in the back to do it by yourself, but honestly you see enough of all these teams to have the best evaluations. Player rankings, seems like a bad idea. But local teams, I’m for it.

They don't know, we're the ultimate stalkers. We invade other fans space. Respeck to TH! 🤣  

AMC probably did roll earlier, but of course last week they only had three points on GB before a late TD. LP is playing much better, now. I think LP is the favorite.