Jump to content

Build Wall or Shut Down the Border


Hagar

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Uh, then give me an example of the Republicans making last minute sexual misconduct allegations against a Supreme Court nominee.

The last three a Democrat President  got to appoint have been women, that’s going back 25 years. I guess that vicious predator RBG must’ve slipped by because of the Republican Senators’ magnanimity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, UT alum said:

The last three a Democrat President  got to appoint have been women, that’s going back 25 years. I guess that vicious predator RBG must’ve slipped by because of the Republican Senators’ magnanimity.

In other words, no supreme court nominee has had sexual impropriety allegations launched at them at the last minute by the Republicans,right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevenash said:

In other words, no supreme court nominee has had sexual impropriety allegations launched at them at the last minute by the Republicans,right?

If you think they wouldn’t use those kind of tactics if the opportunity arose, you’re fooling yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mat said:

I have conceded. I now have to agree with the dems about this being a total waist of money. Their underlying agenda; once they gain more control in a couple years will be to open our borders thus making any wall building cost a total waist of money.

That’s why we need a wall.  They all agree to give more money for drones and agents at the border.  That can easily be turned off when they get power while the wall will still be standing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, UT alum said:

If you think they wouldn’t use those kind of tactics if the opportunity arose, you’re fooling yourself.

No doubt they would if they had substantiated proof.  I’d be embarrassed if they brought someone like Christine Ford to a hearing.  

Of course, if Trump nominates Amy Barrett, the Dems will go after Catholics.  Since most (all?) on the Far Left are anti-Christianity, it could be revealing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Hagar said:

No doubt they would if they had substantiated proof.  I’d be embarrassed if they brought someone like Christine Ford to a hearing.  

Of course, if Trump nominates Amy Barrett, the Dems will go after Catholics.  Since most (all?) on the Far Left are anti-Christianity, it could be revealing.  

Joe freakin’ McCarthy. I rest my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Hagar said:

No doubt they would if they had substantiated proof.  I’d be embarrassed if they brought someone like Christine Ford to a hearing.  

Of course, if Trump nominates Amy Barrett, the Dems will go after Catholics.  Since most (all?) on the Far Left are anti-Christianity, it could be revealing.  

And his lawyer Roy Cohn, Trump’s lawyer until he got sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aclark1510
    Newest Member
    Aclark1510
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I get it!!  I was once in your shoes. I was that person in the stands, loudly complaining about “bad officiating.” Now, with the rise of social media, it’s easier than ever to voice these criticisms online.  I thought I could see every call better than the officials on the floor. Then someone said to me, “If you can do better, get in the game.”   That challenge changed my life. Over 20 years ago, I became a basketball official, and what I’ve learned since then is eye-opening.   Officiating is not just about making calls. It’s about managing the game, the players, the coaches, and yes, the fans. We face a new generation of student-athletes who have been raised in a culture where everyone gets a trophy and losing is almost taboo. We deal with fans who question our integrity and sometimes become outright hostile.   I acknowledge that officials aren’t perfect; we have off days just like anyone else. However, the increasing hostility from fans is driving many to leave officiating. According to the National Federation of High School Associations, approximately 50,000 high school officials have left the profession since the 2018-19 season, with fan behavior being a significant factor.    Here’s the reality: without officials, there is no game.   So, instead of tearing down the people who make your games possible, here’s a suggestion:   • Thank the officials for being part of the game. • Thank them for the countless hours they spend studying rules, mastering mechanics, and working to improve. • Thank them for their patience with privilege-minded athletes and overly aggressive fans.   Next time you see an official, instead of criticizing, take a moment to say, “Thank you.” They’re out there to make the game happen, and trust me, it’s not as easy as it looks from the stands.   If you think you can do better, take the challenge like I did. Get in the game. You might just discover how much it takes to blow that whistle.
    • Friday schedule: 9:20am             Neches vs. Corrigan (last pool game)   Bronze bracket 12pm          New Waverly vs. Warren 2:40pm       Alpha Omega vs. Neches/Corrigan loser (OG) Silver Bracket 2:40pm       Slocum vs. Normangee  (NG) 5:20pm        Kennard vs. Neches/Corrigan winner (OG) Gold Bracket 1:20pm        Alto vs. Trinity 5:20pm        Onalaska vs. Latexo  (NG)    
    • So you’re saying we need to reform our appeal process?🤔
    • Safe travels to all tonight & an injury free game. Go Dawgs!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...