Reagan Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 Another judge appointed to do the wrong thing! Bring it to the Supreme Court! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
WOSdrummer99 Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 Im sorry I couldn't get past... "Ross had said the question - which has not appeared on the decennial census since 1950 - was necessary to enforce federal laws protecting eligible voters." Does this mean we've been counting non us citizens? Then this... "The plaintiffs - 18 U.S. states, 15 cities and various civil rights groups - said that asking census respondents whether they are U.S. citizens will frighten immigrants and Latinos into abstaining from the count." Why would it frighten immigrants if they are here legally? Quote
Ty Cobb Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 Is doesn't frighten immigrants, it only frightens ILLEGAL immigrants. WOSdrummer99 1 Quote
stevenash Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 If you call them illegal immigrants , you must go to sensitivity training even though they are exactly that. Where is your "compassion"? Quote
WOSdrummer99 Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 Where is their respect for the laws of our country? Quote
Hagar Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 Obviously, I’m no legal scholar. A thereto interspersed with any Latin word, sends me into a coma. With that out of the way, it seems like the Judicial Branch of our Govt is upsetting the balance of the three. To many of our Fed Judges base their rulings on their ideology instead of the Constitution. Not sure how these suits (appeals?) work, but it seems easy enough to find a judge to block anything the President may want to do. And for a Repub, the 9th Court of Appeals is Death Valley. In the past, the President lead the country, now he does so only at the dispensation of the Judicial Branch. Personally, I find this trend extremely disturbing and dangerous. Quote
PhatMack19 Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Hagar said: Obviously, I’m no legal scholar. A thereto interspersed with any Latin word, sends me into a coma. With that out of the way, it seems like the Judicial Branch of our Govt is upsetting the balance of the three. To many of our Fed Judges base their rulings on their ideology instead of the Constitution. Not sure how these suits (appeals?) work, but it seems easy enough to find a judge to block anything the President may want to do. And for a Repub, the 9th Court of Appeals is Death Valley. In the past, the President lead the country, now he does so only at the dispensation of the Judicial Branch. Personally, I find this trend extremely disturbing and dangerous. Trump’s appointments are slowly getting appointed across the country. That’s one of the main reasons we need him in office for a 2nd term From Wiki “As of January 12, 2019, there were 12 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 120 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and 17 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 14 for District Courts). This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ” Quote
Hagar Posted January 15, 2019 Report Posted January 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said: Trump’s appointments are slowly getting appointed across the country. That’s on of the main reasons we need him in office for a 2nd term From Wiki “As of January 12, 2019, there were 12 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 120 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and 17 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 14 for District Courts). This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ” I know, and holy moley, I hope he wins again. Still, there will always be some Judges who think “the law” is based on what they want, not the Constitution. Quote
WOSdrummer99 Posted January 16, 2019 Report Posted January 16, 2019 How can these judges blatantly disregard the constitution and not get fired? Reagan 1 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted January 16, 2019 Report Posted January 16, 2019 6 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said: Where is their respect for the laws of our country? They don't give two rat's arses about the laws of this country. They commit crimes here and try to flee back across the border as fast as they can. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 16, 2019 Report Posted January 16, 2019 3 hours ago, PhatMack19 said: Trump’s appointments are slowly getting appointed across the country. That’s on of the main reasons we need him in office for a 2nd term From Wiki “As of January 12, 2019, there were 12 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 120 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and 17 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 14 for District Courts). This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ” The dems won’t like having all these judges legislating from the bench according to the Constitution. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.