stevenash Posted January 25, 2019 Report Posted January 25, 2019 And the indictment has ZERO, ZILCH, NADA to do with the allegations that Trump colluded with the Russians. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 25, 2019 Report Posted January 25, 2019 The latest victim of the witch hunt...unbelievable. Quote
Bobcat1 Posted January 25, 2019 Author Report Posted January 25, 2019 49 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: The latest victim of the witch hunt...unbelievable. I haven't followed the story, but did he not break any laws? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 25, 2019 Report Posted January 25, 2019 32 minutes ago, Bobcat1 said: I haven't followed the story, but did he not break any laws? Not sure, they're saying he lied about trying to find out information about the Democrat's emails and making false statements. (probably answered the same question asked 500 times differently one time) Looks like he's just another casualty in the Mueller investigation that has nothing to do with Russia. We'll see if it sticks. Hagar 1 Quote
PhatMack19 Posted January 25, 2019 Report Posted January 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said: I haven't followed the story, but did he not break any laws? According to the indictment, he lied about knowing about the Wikileaks stuff and then tried to get others to lie as well. He “lied” about something that wasn’t a crime. Quote
UT alum Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 4 hours ago, stevenash said: And the indictment has ZERO, ZILCH, NADA to do with the allegations that Trump colluded with the Russians. Yeah, but the net’s tightening. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 37 minutes ago, UT alum said: Yeah, but the net’s tightening. lol Quote
Reagan Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 14 hours ago, UT alum said: Yeah, but the net’s tightening. Really?! The mere fact that Mueller is doing these side shows proves he has nothing. When he has to try and force a confession to get Trump, well, we know he's losing the war. Quote
stevenash Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 14 hours ago, UT alum said: Yeah, but the net’s tightening. Considering how long they have been 'tightening the net" do you think they will ever come to a full conclusion? Quote
baddog Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 Mueller simply trying to justify the $millions he has been paid to come up with absolutely nothing. Hopefully the noose is tightening around his neck. Quote
Hagar Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 18 hours ago, UT alum said: Yeah, but the net’s tightening. Just curious, do you find it extremely strange that a man has been indicted for lying about his contact with Wikileaks, but there’s no investigation into the Fake Dossier which started all this bru-ha-ha? I do. It’s like Hillary robbed a bank of $20,000 and some of Trumps people picked up a few $20 bills she dropped. Let’s hang these guys for not turning in the twentys, but we’ll let Hillary & the Dems go. I just don’t get it. Btw, I have no problem with someone being arrrested for breaking the law, I just hate to see the scales of justice tipped all the way to one side. Quote
Hagar Posted January 26, 2019 Report Posted January 26, 2019 Then there’s the blank check Mueller has to investigate anyone or anything. Is that legal? If so, the next time the Police want a search warrant, they should say they’re searching for anything. I’m not sure Mueller’s convictions would hold up in SCOTUS. I hope not, but as I said, Lady Justice no longer wears a blindfold. Quote
UT alum Posted January 28, 2019 Report Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/26/2019 at 1:15 PM, Hagar said: Then there’s the blank check Mueller has to investigate anyone or anything. Is that legal? If so, the next time the Police want a search warrant, they should say they’re searching for anything. I’m not sure Mueller’s convictions would hold up in SCOTUS. I hope not, but as I said, Lady Justice no longer wears a blindfold. If she’s no longer blindfolded, which eye is she peeking with, left or right? Quote
Hagar Posted January 29, 2019 Report Posted January 29, 2019 4 hours ago, UT alum said: If she’s no longer blindfolded, which eye is she peeking with, left or right? Dadgum UT, I saw her on TV the other day. Had both eyes open and using a top notch pair of binoculars. Quote
Reagan Posted January 29, 2019 Report Posted January 29, 2019 My question exactly! Why did the FBI director allow Mueller to use 29 FBI gents against Roger Stone. I hope Ted Cruz can find out! This early morning raid was appalling. Mueller is supposed to be investigating things that happened BEFORE he was appointed. These alleged "process crimes" happened AFTER Mueller was appointed. This just give pause and really a sick feeling to anyone, including liberals! Because this could happen to you! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted January 29, 2019 Report Posted January 29, 2019 Roger Stone pleads Not Guilty! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
UT alum Posted January 30, 2019 Report Posted January 30, 2019 On 1/26/2019 at 1:15 PM, Hagar said: Then there’s the blank check Mueller has to investigate anyone or anything. Is that legal? If so, the next time the Police want a search warrant, they should say they’re searching for anything. I’m not sure Mueller’s convictions would hold up in SCOTUS. I hope not, but as I said, Lady Justice no longer wears a blindfold. I think Ken Starr perfected that strategy years ago. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 30, 2019 Report Posted January 30, 2019 1 hour ago, UT alum said: I think Ken Starr perfected that strategy years ago. Only difference is Clinton was actually guilty...smh. Reagan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted January 30, 2019 Report Posted January 30, 2019 One interesting outcome will be that Stone's lawyers will be able to question the committee members that Stone supposedly lied to. This includes, but not limited to, Adam Schiff, the commie Democratic Congressman. This will be very interesting with that one! LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted February 1, 2019 Report Posted February 1, 2019 Fall out from the Roger Stone treatment. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted February 1, 2019 Report Posted February 1, 2019 Let's face it folks -- if Mueller had anything on Trump then he would not be pulling a desperation side show nothing burger concerning Roger Stone! Plus, leaking that attack on Stone's house to CNN, well, I think it backfired on the leakers. It's all out there now to show the world how over the top this invasion was. Unintended consequences, so to speak! Quote
Reagan Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted February 9, 2019 Report Posted February 9, 2019 Video of raid shows FBI working with CNN. There is illegal activity involved here. Mueller needs to explain this! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
baddog Posted February 9, 2019 Report Posted February 9, 2019 4 hours ago, Reagan said: Video of raid shows FBI working with CNN. There is illegal activity involved here. Mueller needs to explain this! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Unbelievable. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.