Jump to content

Voter Fraud Not Real?


Reagan

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Anyone that refuses to believe there’s voter fraud is goofy as a road lizard.  A simple look at the voting results in some areas of Philadelphia is proof enough for me.

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UT alum said:

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

Oh, the old hallmark that all the Dems forgot about during the vote on Kavanaugh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

BAAM!!  UT -- you stepped into that one face first!!

Poor Brett. You guys got a pair of big boy pants amongst you? Politics is tough business. Election fraud is a totally different issue.

Again, you compare apples to oranges and claim victory.

There is no statistical corroboration linking in person voter fraud to election results. Fraud is almost exclusively perpetrated in the absentee voting process. Any of you remember Clarence McNeely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Poor Brett. You guys got a pair of big boy pants amongst you? Politics is tough business. Election fraud is a totally different issue.

Again, you compare apples to oranges and claim victory.

There is no statistical corroboration linking in person voter fraud to election results. Fraud is almost exclusively perpetrated in the absentee voting process. Any of you remember Clarence McNeely?

Did Peter Strzok and Lisa Page investigate the statistical corroboration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

In the 2012 presidential election, there were 59 voting divisions (a Philly term) in Philadelphia that had zero votes for Romney.  Of the 59 divisions, the lowest turnout was 139 voters, and the highest 612 (avg city wide is 616 per Div).  So, to be generous, I’ll say an avg of a little over 300 voters in thos 59.  That’s somewhere between 18 to 19 thousand voters.  And yes, these 59 were predominantly black.  My point is, if every single voter that went in wanted to vote for Obama, some would inadvertently vote for Romney.  Maybe because they’re drunk, on drugs, (and I’m sure that happens all over the country to all races), or just messes up.  Someone was either doing it for them, or helping them as they voted, and I’m pretty sure that comes under the heading of voter fraud.  Proof?  People are fallible, and that’s an irrefutable fact.  We’re not all rocket scientist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hagar said:

In the 2012 presidential election, there were 59 voting divisions (a Philly term) in Philadelphia that had zero votes for Romney.  Of the 59 divisions, the lowest turnout was 139 voters, and the highest 612 (avg city wide is 616 per Div).  So, to be generous, I’ll say an avg of a little over 300 voters in thos 59.  That’s somewhere between 18 to 19 thousand voters.  And yes, these 59 were predominantly black.  My point is, if every single voter that went in wanted to vote for Obama, some would inadvertently vote for Romney.  Maybe because they’re drunk, on drugs, (and I’m sure that happens all over the country to all races), or just messes up.  Someone was either doing it for them, or helping them as they voted, and I’m pretty sure that comes under the heading of voter fraud.  Proof?  People are fallible, and that’s an irrefutable fact.  We’re not all rocket scientist.

Any convictions? Any indictments? Any empirical evidence at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Well -- she cheated ol' Bernie out of the nomination last time.  And THAT'S a fact.  So, one never knows when it comes to cheating!

but wait, you cant say she cheated because there were no indictments!!!!  And, since there were no indictments regarding the email scandal, she actually is innocent!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

Any convictions? Any indictments? Any empirical evidence at all?

Any concerns since it’s a Democratic city?  No.  Any investigation by the City?  No.  One thing you need to understand young feller, in Democratic controlled areas, there are no laws if the actions aids, or is approved by The Party.  A prime example of this occurred in Portland, Oregon where ANTIFA took over several city streets, and attacked drivers at will, with no interference by the Police.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, stevenash said:

but wait, you cant say she cheated because there were no indictments!!!!  And, since there were no indictments regarding the email scandal, she actually is innocent!!!

And no investigation or indictments concerning the 60+ dead bodies she’s left in her wake. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Well -- she cheated ol' Bernie out of the nomination last time.  And THAT'S a fact.  So, one never knows when it comes to cheating!

Again, that’s politics, and as far as I know she used party rules to outmaneuver him. Wasn’t pretty, but that’s not illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Any concerns since it’s a Democratic city?  No.  Any investigation by the City?  No.  One thing you need to understand young feller, in Democratic controlled areas, there are no laws if the actions aids, or is approved by The Party.  A prime example of this occurred in Portland, Oregon where ANTIFA took over several city streets, and attacked drivers at will, with no interference by the Police.  

Unless you’re Methuselah, I ain’t no young feller. Looks like both sides had a fight in Portland, and no one from either side was arrested. To suggest that Democrat controlled areas are lawless is not only absurd, but also an insult to the law enforcement community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,177
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Sharpie98
    Newest Member
    Sharpie98
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...