Voter Fraud Not Real?

[Reagan]

Think again!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Reagan]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Hagar]

Anyone that refuses to believe there’s voter fraud is goofy as a road lizard.  A simple look at the voting results in some areas of Philadelphia is proof enough for me.

[UT alum]

8 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Anyone that refuses to believe there’s voter fraud is goofy as a road lizard.  A simple look at the voting results in some areas of Philadelphia is proof enough for me.

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

[Hagar]

5 minutes ago, UT alum said:

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

Oh, the old hallmark that all the Dems forgot about during the vote on Kavanaugh?

[Reagan]

18 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Oh, the old hallmark that all the Dems forgot about during the vote on Kavanaugh?

BAAM!!  UT -- you stepped into that one face first!!

[UT alum]

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

BAAM!!  UT -- you stepped into that one face first!!

Poor Brett. You guys got a pair of big boy pants amongst you? Politics is tough business. Election fraud is a totally different issue.

Again, you compare apples to oranges and claim victory.

There is no statistical corroboration linking in person voter fraud to election results. Fraud is almost exclusively perpetrated in the absentee voting process. Any of you remember Clarence McNeely?

[stevenash]

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Poor Brett. You guys got a pair of big boy pants amongst you? Politics is tough business. Election fraud is a totally different issue.

Again, you compare apples to oranges and claim victory.

There is no statistical corroboration linking in person voter fraud to election results. Fraud is almost exclusively perpetrated in the absentee voting process. Any of you remember Clarence McNeely?

Did Peter Strzok and Lisa Page investigate the statistical corroboration?

[Hagar]

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

So, if results don’t suit you, must be fraud? The names Paxton and Abbot came up with are “suspected”, and will have 30 days to prove their citizenship. You know, that old American hallmark of guilty until proved innocent. 

In the 2012 presidential election, there were 59 voting divisions (a Philly term) in Philadelphia that had zero votes for Romney.  Of the 59 divisions, the lowest turnout was 139 voters, and the highest 612 (avg city wide is 616 per Div).  So, to be generous, I’ll say an avg of a little over 300 voters in thos 59.  That’s somewhere between 18 to 19 thousand voters.  And yes, these 59 were predominantly black.  My point is, if every single voter that went in wanted to vote for Obama, some would inadvertently vote for Romney.  Maybe because they’re drunk, on drugs, (and I’m sure that happens all over the country to all races), or just messes up.  Someone was either doing it for them, or helping them as they voted, and I’m pretty sure that comes under the heading of voter fraud.  Proof?  People are fallible, and that’s an irrefutable fact.  We’re not all rocket scientist.

[UT alum]

8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Did Peter Strzok and Lisa Page investigate the statistical corroboration?

No. You tell me to prove what I say or think with statistical evidence. If you think in-person voter fraud is epidemic, prove it.

[UT alum]

7 minutes ago, Hagar said:

In the 2012 presidential election, there were 59 voting divisions (a Philly term) in Philadelphia that had zero votes for Romney.  Of the 59 divisions, the lowest turnout was 139 voters, and the highest 612 (avg city wide is 616 per Div).  So, to be generous, I’ll say an avg of a little over 300 voters in thos 59.  That’s somewhere between 18 to 19 thousand voters.  And yes, these 59 were predominantly black.  My point is, if every single voter that went in wanted to vote for Obama, some would inadvertently vote for Romney.  Maybe because they’re drunk, on drugs, (and I’m sure that happens all over the country to all races), or just messes up.  Someone was either doing it for them, or helping them as they voted, and I’m pretty sure that comes under the heading of voter fraud.  Proof?  People are fallible, and that’s an irrefutable fact.  We’re not all rocket scientist.

Any convictions? Any indictments? Any empirical evidence at all?

[stevenash]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Any convictions? Any indictments? Any empirical evidence at all?

There are no convictions or indictments on Mrs. Clinton.  Do you believe she is innocent?

[UT alum]

11 minutes ago, stevenash said:

There are no convictions or indictments on Mrs. Clinton.  Do you believe she is innocent?

Deflect from the real issue - voter fraud. Hillary Clinton’s old news, man, she got beat. She holds no power in federal government. Let it go.

[stevenash]

My question implies that, under certain "circumstances" the justice system is not present.  Do you agree or disagree?

[baddog]

Anyone who would give their precious right to vote to an illegal alien, a right that men and women have given their lives to defend, is not an American at all.

An aside: Hillary Clinton is old news and she lost. Someone needs to tell her she lost and she seems to stay in the news.

[PhatMack19]

18 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Deflect from the real issue - voter fraud. Hillary Clinton’s old news, man, she got beat. She holds no power in federal government. Let it go.

She’s thinking of running again.....

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

She’s thinking of running again.....

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

She’s old news. Never would get nomination.

[Reagan]

14 minutes ago, UT alum said:

She’s old news. Never would get nomination.

Well -- she cheated ol' Bernie out of the nomination last time.  And THAT'S a fact.  So, one never knows when it comes to cheating!

[stevenash]

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Well -- she cheated ol' Bernie out of the nomination last time.  And THAT'S a fact.  So, one never knows when it comes to cheating!

but wait, you cant say she cheated because there were no indictments!!!!  And, since there were no indictments regarding the email scandal, she actually is innocent!!!

[Hagar]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

Any convictions? Any indictments? Any empirical evidence at all?

Any concerns since it’s a Democratic city?  No.  Any investigation by the City?  No.  One thing you need to understand young feller, in Democratic controlled areas, there are no laws if the actions aids, or is approved by The Party.  A prime example of this occurred in Portland, Oregon where ANTIFA took over several city streets, and attacked drivers at will, with no interference by the Police.  

[Hagar]

15 minutes ago, stevenash said:

but wait, you cant say she cheated because there were no indictments!!!!  And, since there were no indictments regarding the email scandal, she actually is innocent!!!

And no investigation or indictments concerning the 60+ dead bodies she’s left in her wake.  

[UT alum]

26 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Well -- she cheated ol' Bernie out of the nomination last time.  And THAT'S a fact.  So, one never knows when it comes to cheating!

Again, that’s politics, and as far as I know she used party rules to outmaneuver him. Wasn’t pretty, but that’s not illegal.

[UT alum]

31 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Any concerns since it’s a Democratic city?  No.  Any investigation by the City?  No.  One thing you need to understand young feller, in Democratic controlled areas, there are no laws if the actions aids, or is approved by The Party.  A prime example of this occurred in Portland, Oregon where ANTIFA took over several city streets, and attacked drivers at will, with no interference by the Police.  

Unless you’re Methuselah, I ain’t no young feller. Looks like both sides had a fight in Portland, and no one from either side was arrested. To suggest that Democrat controlled areas are lawless is not only absurd, but also an insult to the law enforcement community.

[UT alum]

35 minutes ago, Hagar said:

And no investigation or indictments concerning the 60+ dead bodies she’s left in her wake.  

Yeah, Ted Bundy was a lightweight.

[Hagar]

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

 

Quote SNAFU