Jump to content

#1 Shelbyville (22-2A) vs #2 East Chambers (22-3A)


tennisbc

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Crawford said:

No one said they should just play "the reserves". Everyone would get some playing time, but just to a minimum. Mainly your starters or key players, to lower the risk of injury just before the playoffs when it matters the most. And like Ferg 510 had mention, if you have players nursing their injuries, of coarse you wouldn't put them in this game. 

Nursing injuries is one thing but coaches dont take a warmup game, especially one between 2 teams of this caliber just for a light practice.  They want the game to be stiff competition to see where they are against good competition.  The kids can get hurt at practice, just ask Dez Bryant. If these coaches were going tomworry about an injury they wouldnt have agreed to the game.  Now if the game situation warrants removing players, ie a blowout or maybe a physical game getting out of control then all things change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ST413 said:

Yeah and a kid can get hurt in practice just as easy as a game....matters mot when the game was agreed upon.  If they have injuries sure they may sit them out but if not i am sure both coaches will go all out to win this game or else they would not have agreed upon it.

I agree 100%. I'm saying 4 games later and numerous practices things change and decisions have to be made. Kids that would definitely be playing in the playoffs with injuries might not in a warm up. Never said they wont go all out to win but not at all cost like they will in the playoffs. Should be a great game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ferg 510 said:

I agree 100%. I'm saying 4 games later and numerous practices things change and decisions have to be made. Kids that would definitely be playing in the playoffs with injuries might not in a warm up. Never said they wont go all out to win but not at all cost like they will in the playoffs. Should be a great game.

Hey Ferg, you know I’m a distant fan of Shelbyville, and I understand Lipan, but what happen in Aransas Pass game?  Didn’t realize y’all had lost to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Hey Ferg, you know I’m a distant fan of Shelbyville, and I understand Lipan, but what happen in Aransas Pass game?  Didn’t realize y’all had lost to them.

No we beat them and Lipan game we played the worst game we played all year I'm sure in large part to Lipan. We've only lost 2 the other was to Spring Hill on a shot at the buzzer. Hagar we are playing the best ball of the year right now. Just hope it last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, aTmfan06 said:

This will be a play to win game just like any other. Unless a player has a nagging injury. 

Yes this is what I was saying. Decisions in this game will be completely different than a decision that would be made in a playoff game otherwise I think both teams will go all out to win this warm up game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I can promise we will play to win although the reason we are playing goes far beyond winning. We need tested and East Chambers and Coach Sutherland will prepare us for the playoffs. As you can tell by looking at our schedule we do not shy from great competition. The boys wanted to play this game, it was their decision and they are all in( as usual). Should be a great game and I enjoy all the support of high school basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1:00 PM – #4 Big Sandy (16-2A) vs Longview Pine Tree (16-5A)                                                2:30 PM – Dekalb (14-3A) vs Kerens (19 – 2A) 4:00 PM – #10 Coldspring Oak (23-3A) vs #23 Atlanta (14-3A)                                                    5:30 PM – #1 Shelbyville (22-2A) vs #2 EastChambers (22-3A)                                       7:00 PM – Edgewood (12-3A) vs #5 Grapeland (20-2A)                                                                  8:30 PM – #9 Tenaha (22-2A) vs Carthage(20-4A)                                                                                Fridays updated schedule should be a great day for basketball junkies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ferg 510 said:

1:00 PM – #4 Big Sandy (16-2A) vs Longview Pine Tree (16-5A)                                                2:30 PM – Dekalb (14-3A) vs Kerens (19 – 2A) 4:00 PM – #10 Coldspring Oak (23-3A) vs #23 Atlanta (14-3A)                                                    5:30 PM – #1 Shelbyville (22-2A) vs #2 EastChambers (22-3A)                                       7:00 PM – Edgewood (12-3A) vs #5 Grapeland (20-2A)                                                                  8:30 PM – #9 Tenaha (22-2A) vs Carthage(20-4A)                                                                                Fridays updated schedule should be a great day for basketball junkies 

Is this whole lineup taking place at the same location on the same day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Polar Bear said:

EC has not had a competitive game in several weeks.  The whole point of this game for EC is to have to play under pressure. I assure you Sutherland is playing this game to win. 

Shelbyville has played a ranked team just about every week of the season. Coach Schmidt will play to win. Should be a great game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Crawford said:

I probably already know the answer to my question, but I'll ask it anyways. Will this "warm up game", effect the teams record? Will it count? Shelbyville 32-2 and East Chambers 25-2.

Yes Shelbyville had 1 game left open for this purpose of a warm up game. I know they counted last year's warm warm up game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2019 at 6:39 PM, TxHoops said:

I agree.   I could see Shelbyville maybe winning a nail biter.  Or it wouldn’t shock me if the Bucs won by 20.    10 sounds about right though.  

44 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

I definitely don’t see Shelbyville as big under dogs 

I was thinking of Txhoops which I respect his basketball knowledge saying the Bucs could win by 20. Twenty point underdog in a matchup against #1 & #2 is a big underdog IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ferg 510 said:

I was thinking of Txhoops which I respect his basketball knowledge saying the Bucs could win by 20. Twenty point underdog in a matchup against #1 & #2 is a big underdog IMO.

Purely from a matchup perspective.  But it’s tough to say until you see them matched up.  The only result that would surprise me would be a Shelbyville blowout.  Any other result I could see.  My guess is EC by 5-10.   Six seems like a good line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...