The UT Alum " noose is tightening" theory

[stevenash]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

May not get him, but a slew of them  right in there with him are gonna be in hot water.  That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean.

[LumRaiderFan]

18 minutes ago, UT alum said:

May not get him, but a slew of them  right in there with him are gonna be in hot water.  That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean.

What con did he pull?

Surely he’s not smart enough to fool the righteous folks going after him.

 

[stevenash]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

May not get him, but a slew of them  right in there with him are gonna be in hot water.  That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean.

and none of it will be related to collusion

[UT alum]

52 minutes ago, stevenash said:

and none of it will be related to collusion

What will it be related to then?

[stevenash]

Financial misdealings or proving that someone said red when the tape said they said blue.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

What will it be related to then?

Do you watch any news at all?

[UT alum]

7 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Do you watch any news at all?

Yeah, more than one channel, too. Read newspapers, as well. What’s your point?

[LumRaiderFan]

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yeah, more than one channel, too. Read newspapers, as well. What’s your point?

You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging.  Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on.  By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why.  Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense.  

[UT alum]

7 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging.  Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on.  By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why.  Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense.  

News reference is because 90% of the links I see on here are foxnews links.

[stevenash]

Bottom line ( even though you will never acknowledge) is Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians and the election results are legitimate.  There are no spin possibilities left and the only "believers" are the Trump haters

[UT alum]

24 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Bottom line ( even though you will never acknowledge) is Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians and the election results are legitimate.  There are no spin possibilities left and the only "believers" are the Trump haters

Did I miss the release of the final report?

[Reagan]

51 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Did I miss the release of the final report?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

10 minutes ago, Reagan said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

[LumRaiderFan]

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

28 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

You got that right, bro.

[stevenash]

50 minutes ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

Do you think it will ever be released?  Two years not long enough?  Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion.  But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians.   Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. 

[UT alum]

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Do you think it will ever be released?  Two years not long enough?  Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion.  But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians.   Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. 

What's willing got to do with it? Influencing and rigging are two different things.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING!  If he did, we would have heard about it.  Second:  The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING!  So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING!  It's only a matter of time!

[UT alum]

47 minutes ago, Reagan said:

The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING!  If he did, we would have heard about it.  Second:  The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING!  So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING!  It's only a matter of time!

How do you know what he has? If it was nothing, it would be over. You must be confusing this investigation with Benghazi.

[stevenash]

If he has nothing, it will NEVER be over.    As for Benghazi, are you referring to the situation where a certain administration did its dead level best to convince the public ( around election time, of course) that the attack was the result of an internet video?

[LumRaiderFan]

8 hours ago, UT alum said:

How do you know what he has? If it was nothing, it would be over. You must be confusing this investigation with Benghazi.

To compare this to Benghazi shows how clueless you are about both situations.

 

[UT alum]

38 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

To compare this to Benghazi shows how clueless you are about both situations.

 

Millions of wasted tax dollars.

[LumRaiderFan]

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Millions of wasted tax dollars.

Benghazi was a coverup...this latest is a witch-hunt that has proved nothing.

Like I said, clueless.

[UT alum]

9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Benghazi was a coverup...this latest is a witch-hunt that has proved nothing.

Like I said, clueless.

Like I said, millions of wasted tax dollars. Indictments? Convictions?  Zero. A witch hunt that proved nothing.