Ty Cobb Posted February 27, 2019 Report Posted February 27, 2019 Wow!!! I think that pretty much sums up everything you need to know about the DEMONcrats and their lying, cheating, AMERICA hating ways!!! Hagar and Reagan 2 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 27, 2019 Report Posted February 27, 2019 This is their star witness...a man going to jail for lying. Pathetic Quote
baddog Posted February 27, 2019 Report Posted February 27, 2019 The most influential statement made by Mr. Jordan was, “The democrats don’t care”. How sad. Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 4 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: This is their star witness...a man going to jail for lying. Pathetic Not the star. Just the first. Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Ty Cobb said: Wow!!! I think that pretty much sums up everything you need to know about the DEMONcrats and their lying, cheating, AMERICA hating ways!!! I object, sir. Your Republican Party is lead by a lying, cheating, “what can my country do for me” narcissist. Fevertree 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 49 minutes ago, UT alum said: Not the star. Just the first. The noose is tightening, right? This clown had nothing, and he’s their star. Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: The noose is tightening, right? This clown had nothing, and he’s their star. I said net, not noose. And it’s gonna have a bunch of fish in it. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 5 minutes ago, UT alum said: I said net, not noose. And it’s gonna have a bunch of fish in it. Give me a list of the charges. 1) 2) 3) Quote
Ty Cobb Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 48 minutes ago, UT alum said: I object, sir. Your Republican Party is lead by a lying, cheating, “what can my country do for me” narcissist. You may be correct with your statement, but I haven’t seen our President do anything to hurt America or the Christian values that America was founded on. I haven’t seen any proof that he is racist like the DEMONcrats/liberals claim. What I have seen is the DEMONcrat party attack anything that is related to President Trump. I have seen the DEMONcrat party value illegal immigrants more than fellow AMERICANS. That is enough for me!!! Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 5 minutes ago, Ty Cobb said: You may be correct with your statement, but I haven’t seen our President do anything to hurt America or the Christian values that America was founded on. I haven’t seen any proof that he is racist like the DEMONcrats/liberals claim. What I have seen is the DEMONcrat party attack anything that is related to President Trump. I have seen the DEMONcrat party value illegal immigrants more than fellow AMERICANS. That is enough for me!!! Don’t forget that many of them are in favor of killing young children outside of the womb. You proud of that policy UT alum? Ty Cobb 1 Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 20 minutes ago, Ty Cobb said: You may be correct with your statement, but I haven’t seen our President do anything to hurt America or the Christian values that America was founded on. I haven’t seen any proof that he is racist like the DEMONcrats/liberals claim. What I have seen is the DEMONcrat party attack anything that is related to President Trump. I have seen the DEMONcrat party value illegal immigrants more than fellow AMERICANS. That is enough for me!!! Not the prison reform bill. Central Park five Birtherism Fines in New York for racial discrimination of housing Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 40 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Give me a list of the charges. 1) 2) 3) Again, I’m not privy to the investigation. That’s where the charges will be listed. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 12 minutes ago, UT alum said: Again, I’m not privy to the investigation. That’s where the charges will be listed. You must be privy to it, you already know the net will be full of fish. Quote
Ty Cobb Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 27 minutes ago, UT alum said: Not the prison reform bill. Central Park five Birtherism Fines in New York for racial discrimination of housing I’m not familiar with any of these anx it will take me some time to research them. I just read about the Central Park 5. What does that prove? Quote
Ty Cobb Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 Birtherism? What exactly does that prove? Are you saying these things prove that President Trump is racist? If so, you need to figure out what racist means. President Trump doubts, like others do, that President Obama is an American. That is not racist. President Trump thinks that 5 people who admitted to a crime are guilty. How is that racist? Quote
Englebert Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Not the prison reform bill. Central Park five Birtherism Fines in New York for racial discrimination of housing Your choice of "evidence" of racism illustrates an over reliance and utter dependency on Liberal propaganda. But yet you will undoubtedly accuse us of blinding following Conservative talking points, even after you laughably coughed up these gems. Remind us again of who started the "birther" movement. Was it the same person that called half of America "deplorables"? LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
UT alum Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 56 minutes ago, Ty Cobb said: Birtherism? What exactly does that prove? Are you saying these things prove that President Trump is racist? If so, you need to figure out what racist means. President Trump doubts, like others do, that President Obama is an American. That is not racist. President Trump thinks that 5 people who admitted to a crime are guilty. How is that racist? He wouldn’t have done it to a white man. Thr justice system vacated their sentences, and still he kept after it. I started to say he wouldn’t do it to a white man, but he’d do it to anyone to draw attention to himself, so that was a poor example of racism. It’s just Trump. Quote
Reagan Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 Zero evidence! If the Dems actually had anything on Russian collusion, they would not have lead with stormy daniels and racism. Like I've always said -- when one is losing the argument one starts screaming racism! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Hagar 1 Quote
TxHoops Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 I will probably get blasted for this but Congress has an all time low number of lawyers among its members. I read it’s somewhere around 36 percent when historically it’s been around 80 percent. This couldn’t have been more apparent than in the Cohen hearings. The questioning was unwatchable. No real examination. People reading statements pre-prepared. No follow ups. All of them just basically stumping their self-interests. I would also submit that the current make up of congrès also lends itself to being unable to negotiate and find common ground, without folks who practice these “arts” for a living. Is this shift in backgrounds/professions of Congress members a bad thing? LRF and I have discussed the benefit of “gridlock” in Congress many times. But what about when we actually need those yahoos to get something done? LumRaiderFan, baddog and Hagar 3 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 51 minutes ago, TxHoops said: I will probably get blasted for this but Congress has an all time low number of lawyers among its members. I read it’s somewhere around 36 percent when historically it’s been around 80 percent. This couldn’t have been more apparent than in the Cohen hearings. The questioning was unwatchable. No real examination. People reading statements pre-prepared. No follow ups. All of them just basically stumping their self-interests. I would also submit that the current make up of congrès also lends itself to being unable to negotiate and find common ground, without folks who practice these “arts” for a living. Is this shift in backgrounds/professions of Congress members a bad thing? LRF and I have discussed the benefit of “gridlock” in Congress many times. But what about when we actually needs those yahoos to get something done? Agree, I have been a fan of gridlock recently because that seemed to be the best way for bad policy to be stopped. Our lawmakers need to consist of a group of reasonable individuals that are measuring all legislation against our Constitution. That being said, they must first understand our Constitution and govern by it, even when it is in disagreement with their own ideology. (One can always wish, huh?) If this calls for more lawyers, which I would think would be inclined to try to reach some sort of compromise on most issues, then I'm all for it. Some issues are too important to compromise on and most should be dealt with on the state level anyway. (Wishing again) I see these freshman congressmen and women come in with no regard for the Constitution and no intention of negotiating, even within their own party. Hopefully, it will improve (by purging the agitators) but until then, I'll continue to root for gridlock. TxHoops 1 Quote
stevenash Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 On 2/28/2019 at 8:55 PM, UT alum said: He wouldn’t have done it to a white man. Thr justice system vacated their sentences, and still he kept after it. I started to say he wouldn’t do it to a white man, but he’d do it to anyone to draw attention to himself, so that was a poor example of racism. It’s just Trump. And exactly how is it that you "know" that? Quote
TxHoops Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 32 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Agree, I have been a fan of gridlock recently because that seemed to be the best way for bad policy to be stopped. Our lawmakers need to consist of a group of reasonable individuals that are measuring all legislation against our Constitution. That being said, they must first understand our Constitution and govern by it, even when it is in disagreement with their own ideology. (One can always wish, huh?) If this calls for more lawyers, which I would think would be inclined to try to reach some sort of compromise on most issues, then I'm all for it. Some issues are too important to compromise on and most should be dealt with on the state level anyway. (Wishing again) I see these freshman congressmen and women come in with no regard for the Constitution and no intention of negotiating, even within their own party. Hopefully, it will improve (by purging the agitators) but until then, I'll continue to root for gridlock. Man, very well said my friend. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
UT alum Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 1 hour ago, stevenash said: And exactly how is it that you "know" that? I got eyes and ears. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.