Trump accepts Kim's claim about Warmbier

[Englebert]

1 hour ago, mat said:

I used to enjoy posting on this site but I don't post very often because of the attacking, insulting mentality that has grown towards those that disagree or share their opinions. I have read your posts for sometime, and while you seem intelligent and post some well thought out debates you tend to be aggressive and insulting all too often. I don't claim to know more than you or the next guy but I should be able to state my opinion without being insulted. I enjoy a good debate but not pisssing contests. Both end up with pee on their feet

Peace out.

You started it. Don't blame that crap on me. I have the audacity to challenge you on your obvious blunder, and you try to make me the "bad guy". You chose to engage in the pissing contest by challenging my comprehension skills, then want to play victim when confronted in kind. It's pretty sad when you can't own up to your own statements, and really ridiculous when you try to blame others for your childishness. I could have chosen the high road, but I no longer feel that does any good. Attacking probably doesn't either, so...

[LumRaiderFan]

Group hug

[Englebert]

I got swung at, then chastised for swinging back. To top it off, I got accused of being the aggressor, and the aggressor portrays himself as the victim. So yeah, I guess a group hug is in order. Just a common occurrence in today's world. LOL.

[stevenash]

2 hours ago, Englebert said:

I got swung at, then chastised for swinging back. To top it off, I got accused of being the aggressor, and the aggressor portrays himself as the victim. So yeah, I guess a group hug is in order. Just a common occurrence in today's world. LOL.

If only you were "enlightened" you could grasp this situation so much better

[Englebert]

19 minutes ago, stevenash said:

If only you were "enlightened" you could grasp this situation so much better

If I was enlightened, I would probably be arguing from that same side. I'm not sure I want to be enlightened just yet. 

[Hagar]

I thought the answer, in that forum, was appropriate.  

What I find confusing, the liberals & the MSM is forever on him for not talking presidential.  In this case, despite what he might have liked to say, he was presidential and diplomatic, and those same folks want to attack him.  So what if he had responded with, “Well un can bite me”.  Then the MSM is on him like a bun on a hamburger, and un starts detonating nuclear bombs and firing missiles.  Please people, put your thinking caps on.

[baddog]

4 hours ago, Hagar said:

I thought the answer, in that forum, was appropriate.  

What I find confusing, the liberals & the MSM is forever on him for not talking presidential.  In this case, despite what he might have liked to say, he was presidential and diplomatic, and those same folks want to attack him.  So what if he had responded with, “Well un can bite me”.  Then the MSM is on him like a bun on a hamburger, and un starts detonating nuclear bombs and firing missiles.  Please people, put your thinking caps on.

.....like the dims have a clue about foreign policy. Obama’s policy was turn his back on Israel, run from Un and Putin, suck up to the Japs, and lift sanctions on Iran. Absolutely none of this makes sense.

Face it, dims have no policy/platform for anything. Anti-Trump is not a platform but they will all mention Trump when campaigning.

[UT alum]

15 hours ago, mat said:

I used to enjoy posting on this site but I don't post very often because of the attacking, insulting mentality that has grown towards those that disagree or share their opinions. I have read your posts for sometime, and while you seem intelligent and post some well thought out debates you tend to be aggressive and insulting all too often. I don't claim to know more than you or the next guy but I should be able to state my opinion without being insulted. I enjoy a good debate but not pisssing contests. Both end up with pee on their feet

Peace out.

Don’t let him run you off, Mat. He can’t offer rational arguments, so he resorts to demagoguery, like his Fearless Leader. Just a wannabe.

[crazeddeer]

Wow didn't know there were that many racist here on this forum.

[PAMFAM10]

Its amazing. Truly amazing.

[Englebert]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

Don’t let him run you off, Mat. He can’t offer rational arguments, so he resorts to demagoguery, like his Fearless Leader. Just a wannabe.

I guess you are another wanna be bully. Are you actually accusing me of being the instigator. Are you really that pathetic?

What rational arguments did I fail to offer? Let's test your analytical skills. Can you backup your wild claims, or is your big talk really just immature bluster?

[Englebert]

5 hours ago, crazeddeer said:

Wow didn't know there were that many racist here on this forum.

Who are you condemning as racist? What basis leads you to level that claim?

[baddog]

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

Who are you condemning as racist? What basis leads you to level that claim?

Anyone who is not a lefty is a racist. It helps them keep up with all of their labels. What they fail to realize is that should socialism ever take hold, all of those divisions and labels will disappear. We will all be Pringle’s potato chips.

[UT alum]

5 hours ago, Englebert said:

I guess you are another wanna be bully. Are you actually accusing me of being the instigator. Are you really that pathetic?

What rational arguments did I fail to offer? Let's test your analytical skills. Can you backup your wild claims, or is your big talk really just immature bluster?

Maybe  I am pathetic, but I’m not a pedantic demagogue. All I’ve seen of your posts are insults and name calling. I haven’t seen any attempt at rational argument from you. Your skin must be pretty thin skinned, too if what I’ve said makes you feel bullied.

[Englebert]

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Maybe  I am pathetic, but I’m not a pedantic demagogue. All I’ve seen of your posts are insults and name calling. I haven’t seen any attempt at rational argument from you. Your skin must be pretty thin skinned, too if what I’ve said makes you feel bullied.

Yes, you are pathetic. I get no rational argument from you...only attempts to bully. And it infuriates you when I respond in kind. Let that sink in. I counter in kind, but yet you get mad.

And your analytical skills are on par with a 2nd grader if you think my responding in kind somehow signals I have thin skin. Why do you even try? But please, keep posting. Your lack of intelligence shows more and more with each pathetic post. It must be disheartening for you knowing you can't win at the only type of game you know how to play.

[UT alum]

19 hours ago, Englebert said:

Yes, you are pathetic. I get no rational argument from you...only attempts to bully. And it infuriates you when I respond in kind. Let that sink in. I counter in kind, but yet you get mad.

And your analytical skills are on par with a 2nd grader if you think my responding in kind somehow signals I have thin skin. Why do you even try? But please, keep posting. Your lack of intelligence shows more and more with each pathetic post. It must be disheartening for you knowing you can't win at the only type of game you know how to play.

I rest my case.

[Englebert]

49 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I rest my case.

So, you can't debate. You can't even defend your own pathetic statements. You are too scared because you know how childish you will sound. It's probably best that you bow out now before embarrassing yourself even further.

[Hagar]

The post by crazeddeer is a prime example.  This thread is not about race or racism, yet he/she jumps in with an absurd accusation.  Absurd accusations are a staple of the Left.  Most often, Englebert will initially ask for proof of said accusation, or ask for honest debate. while simultaneously tearing it apart.  From what I’ve observed, very rarely does he get either one.  Forget if you think his attacks are to mean, debate him with facts.  If you don’t have facts to back up something absurd, my advice would be for you not to post it to begin with.  

As I’ve stated before, I’m on a liberal thread on FB.  I know better that to post anything unless I’ve got backup.  The responses I get on there would make Englebert look like a choirboy, especially when I nail them to the wall on something.  Bottom line, before you liberals make any accusations, have your ducks in a row.

[LumRaiderFan]

7 hours ago, Hagar said:

The post by crazeddeer is a prime example.  This thread is not about race or racism, yet he/she jumps in with an absurd accusation.  Absurd accusations are a staple of the Left.  Most often, Englebert will initially ask for proof of said accusation, or ask for honest debate. while simultaneously tearing it apart.  From what I’ve observed, very rarely does he get either one.  Forget if you think his attacks are to mean, debate him with facts.  If you don’t have facts to back up something absurd, my advice would be for you not to post it to begin with.  

As I’ve stated before, I’m on a liberal thread on FB.  I know better that to post anything unless I’ve got backup.  The responses I get on there would make Englebert look like a choirboy, especially when I nail them to the wall on something.  Bottom line, before you liberals make any accusations, have your ducks in a row.

Good luck with that one...much easier to throw out the race card.