Jump to content

Whatever you think of Trump


stevenash

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Again, your analytical skills are atrocious. I had to spoon feed you what LumRaiderFan implied...and what most, if not all, others on this board readily interpreted. You seem to be the only one that is lost, evidenced by your proclamation that Trump fires everyone that doesn't agree with him. Do you hear the laughter?

Again, Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Again, Sad.

Yes indeed, for you. Are you tired of embarrassing yourself? Would you like to explain how you can't even interpret a clear statement, but somehow have the skillfulness to make a judgmental statement about someone in which you have no clue. That is sad, and laughably hubristic. That laughter must be deafening by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right but then again, we are only half way through the first term.   Does it remind you of " you can keep your doctor and healthcare plan if you want",

"my new healthcare plan will save the average family $2500 in annual  premiums"  " Benghazi was caused by an internet video"  " Bowe Bergdahl served this country with honor and distinction"   " I will build a 21st century VA"  " My stimulus plan will provide shovel ready jobs"

It may be hard for me to square the former with the promise.   However, I am guessing your efforts at " squaring" all of the latter will be more difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Trade deficit increases $100 billion since Trump took office. Highest deficit in history.  Budget deficit set to hit almost $1 trillion this year. Square that with his promises.

Patience...the promise isn't broken until he's gone.  Such as the promises Nash pointed out that Obama clearly broke. (more like flat out lies)

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Patience...the promise isn't broken until he's gone.  Such as the promises Nash pointed out that Obama clearly broke. (more like flat out lies)

This is the hidden content, please

those flat out lies were either overt, intentional lies and if they were not lies, they were then spoken by an extremely naïve individual who is not, as portrayed, the "smartest man in the world"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

You are right but then again, we are only half way through the first term.   Does it remind you of " you can keep your doctor and healthcare plan if you want",

"my new healthcare plan will save the average family $2500 in annual  premiums"  " Benghazi was caused by an internet video"  " Bowe Bergdahl served this country with honor and distinction"   " I will build a 21st century VA"  " My stimulus plan will provide shovel ready jobs"

It may be hard for me to square the former with the promise.   However, I am guessing your efforts at " squaring" all of the latter will be more difficult.

It would be better if you simply made stuff up. Facts are confusing to some. It makes them stutter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, baddog said:

It would be better if you simply made stuff up. Facts are confusing to some. It makes them stutter.

Bash the past all you want. It’s who’s President now that’s relevant. So what about his healthcare promises? Or, “I like people who weren’t captured”. Or, not saying jack about the Kashoggi murdrer? Not a word about the botched Yemeni raid? I can keep going with more facts that’ll have you muttering, if not stuttering. You can’t see the present when you’re lost in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Bash the past all you want. It’s who’s President now that’s relevant. So what about his healthcare promises? Or, “I like people who weren’t captured”. Or, not saying jack about the Kashoggi murdrer? Not a word about the botched Yemeni raid? I can keep going with more facts that’ll have you muttering, if not stuttering. You can’t see the present when you’re lost in the past.

I would say the effects of Obamacare are relevant, wouldn't you?

And I seem to recall you bringing up 2007 several times...which way do you want it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Bash the past all you want. It’s who’s President now that’s relevant. So what about his healthcare promises? Or, “I like people who weren’t captured”. Or, not saying jack about the Kashoggi murdrer? Not a word about the botched Yemeni raid? I can keep going with more facts that’ll have you muttering, if not stuttering. You can’t see the present when you’re lost in the past.

Really, Kashoggi vs. Benghazi? Really? Didn't care for McCain so that's a moot point with me.  Do you hold it against Jimmy Carter for the botched hostage rescue attempt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I would say the effects of Obamacare are relevant, wouldn't you?

And I seem to recall you bringing up 2007 several times...which way do you want it?

 

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I would say the effects of Obamacare are relevant, wouldn't you?

And I seem to recall you bringing up 2007 several times...which way do you want it?

I think my 2007 remarks were in response to comments about stuff that happened in 2005. That was in an historical context, not just “your guy lied too”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Really, Kashoggi vs. Benghazi? Really? Didn't care for McCain so that's a moot point with me.  Do you hold it against Jimmy Carter for the botched hostage rescue attempt?

Yemen vs Benghazi. Buck stops at top, so yeah, Carter gets the rap. McCain was a war hero whether you cared for him or not. I didn’t particularly care for his politics, but I respected his service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yemen vs Benghazi. Buck stops at top, so yeah, Carter gets the rap. McCain was a war hero whether you cared for him or not. I didn’t particularly care for his politics, but I respected his service.

Of course I respect his service. He was a rhino, so I didn't trust him any further than I could throw him. 

Trump was young in office for Yemen. Not making excuses, just laying it off on the military brass in charge. Same for Carter. Both were valiant efforts, just didn't work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I would say the effects of Obamacare are relevant, wouldn't you?

And I seem to recall you bringing up 2007 several times...which way do you want it?

And, Obamacare would have had a better chance if all states had participated in exchanges and the individual mandate had been left in place. Insurance is based on the law of large numbers. The larger the pool of participants, the more broadly and cheaply the costs are spread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

Do you consider all those that have fought in war as heroes?

No. Heroes go above and beyond. Why do you think they give medals for exemplary bravery and personal sacrifice? All members of the military deserve our thanks and respect for their service. My son did 20 years in the Navy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

And, Obamacare would have had a better chance if all states had participated in exchanges and the individual mandate had been left in place. Insurance is based on the law of large numbers. The larger the pool of participants, the more broadly and cheaply the costs are spread.

Obama had one purpose...single payer.

Republicans have been trying to allow competition across all states for years.  The Dems didn’t want any of that, because it was still privatized and not under the thumb of the fed gov.

Remember Obama telling the woman’s mother she may have to take a pill instead of receiving an operation...there was a glimpse of Obamacare straight from the liars mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

No. Heroes go above and beyond. Why do you think they give medals for exemplary bravery and personal sacrifice? All members of the military deserve our thanks and respect for their service. My son did 20 years in the Navy.

They don't have to win the Congressional medal of Honor to be my hero. Thank your son for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Yemen vs Benghazi. Buck stops at top, so yeah, Carter gets the rap. McCain was a war hero whether you cared for him or not. I didn’t particularly care for his politics, but I respected his service.

Most everyone respects his service, doesn’t mean his squishy moderate politics are beyond criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Obama had one purpose...single payer.

Republicans have been trying to allow competition across all states for years.  The Dems didn’t want any of that, because it was still privatized and not under the thumb of the fed gov.

Remember Obama telling the woman’s mother she may have to take a pill instead of receiving an operation...there was a glimpse of Obamacare straight from the liars mouth.

Congress, all of ‘em, aren’t into competition when it comes to healthcare. I read a most enlightening article in the WSJ several years ago about a man in Pennsylvania who needed a hip replacement and had no insurance. The best cash deal he could get in the US was $90,000+. Of that amount, $10,000 was the cost of the actual replacement part, manufactured by a company in Ohio. The man began to look elsewhere and found out he could get the same procedure done in Belgium, including transportation, meals and lodging through the rehab period for less than $20,000. One major cost saving: the same part by the same manufacturer cost $1,000. The Belgian government bid out x number of parts estimated to be used in a year, and the cheapest bid won. In 2014 Belgium’s cost of healthcare as a percentage of GDP was 10.4%. We are over 18%. It seems the single payer system in Belgium is more competitive and less costly than our so-called private healthcare system. And don’t blame lawsuits. Most states have enacted tort reform statutes that strictly limit the liability of healthcare providers. Congress refuses to give Medicare the right to similarly bargain for the best deal. Competition in the private healthcare market? Don’t make me laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Congress, all of ‘em, aren’t into competition when it comes to healthcare. I read a most enlightening article in the WSJ several years ago about a man in Pennsylvania who needed a hip replacement and had no insurance. The best cash deal he could get in the US was $90,000+. Of that amount, $10,000 was the cost of the actual replacement part, manufactured by a company in Ohio. The man began to look elsewhere and found out he could get the same procedure done in Belgium, including transportation, meals and lodging through the rehab period for less than $20,000. One major cost saving: the same part by the same manufacturer cost $1,000. The Belgian government bid out x number of parts estimated to be used in a year, and the cheapest bid won. In 2014 Belgium’s cost of healthcare as a percentage of GDP was 10.4%. We are over 18%. It seems the single payer system in Belgium is more competitive and less costly than our so-called private healthcare system. And don’t blame lawsuits. Most states have enacted tort reform statutes that strictly limit the liability of healthcare providers. Congress refuses to give Medicare the right to similarly bargain for the best deal. Competition in the private healthcare market? Don’t make me laugh.

Competition in the private market is what has made this country the greatest in the world., shame that you can't see that.

You can throw out all these types of stats you want, when the wealthy in any area of the world is ill and needs the best care, they come here.

Don't you get tired of downgrading America?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Congress, all of ‘em, aren’t into competition when it comes to healthcare. I read a most enlightening article in the WSJ several years ago about a man in Pennsylvania who needed a hip replacement and had no insurance. The best cash deal he could get in the US was $90,000+. Of that amount, $10,000 was the cost of the actual replacement part, manufactured by a company in Ohio. The man began to look elsewhere and found out he could get the same procedure done in Belgium, including transportation, meals and lodging through the rehab period for less than $20,000. One major cost saving: the same part by the same manufacturer cost $1,000. The Belgian government bid out x number of parts estimated to be used in a year, and the cheapest bid won. In 2014 Belgium’s cost of healthcare as a percentage of GDP was 10.4%. We are over 18%. It seems the single payer system in Belgium is more competitive and less costly than our so-called private healthcare system. And don’t blame lawsuits. Most states have enacted tort reform statutes that strictly limit the liability of healthcare providers. Congress refuses to give Medicare the right to similarly bargain for the best deal. Competition in the private healthcare market? Don’t make me laugh.

Belgium has one of the highest effective tax rates in the world.  That "system" has a 21% VAT tax.  Their system covers 98% of their population while the U.S. system covers 91% .  I would also guess that Belgium does not have, within their cost structure, the expense of covering a very large sum of non citizens getting coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Competition in the private market is what has made this country the greatest in the world., shame that you can't see that.

You can throw out all these types of stats you want, when the wealthy in any area of the world is ill and needs the best care, they come here.

Don't you get tired of downgrading America?

Not the dude from Pennsylvania. Then again, he wasn’ wealthy. Offering my opinion on how the system could be improved is not downgrading America. How else can you justify a company selling the same part overseas for 1/10 the cost it charged here besides lack of competition? Competition is great. Our healthcare system demonstrates what happens in a”free” market without competition. Excessive cost with lower overall health outcomes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t know about any rivalry there because I don’t live there but although LP and DP play in different classifications they still have a lot in common.  I mean, both beat Barber’s Hill this year!
    • I’m super excited for this game.  PNG has the team and game plan that will slow TH down.  No way we can stop them the entire game, but I feel if we slow them down we can win similar to what we did last year to Lake Creek and SOC.  
    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...