Jump to content

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says

LumRaiderFan

By LumRaiderFan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

"So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory," Ratcliffe began as he questioned Page under oath, according to a transcript excerpt he posted on Twitter. "But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —"

Page interrupted: "That is correct," as Ratcliffe finished his sentence, " -- bring a case based on that."

 

Anyone want to argue that Trump and Clinton got the same treatment?

Trump has a reason to not trust our top law enforcement agencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted

From the article:  "This deserves more attention! FBI Mistress, Lisa Page, confirmed to House Judiciary, there was an anti-Trump Insurance Policy and it's the fake Russian investigation! She admits there was almost no evidence on collusion, yet they continued with WITCH HUNT!

This is the hidden content, please
  — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul)
This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, stevenash said:

Paging UT Alum- after reading the above, do you still think that there is no deep state and that Trump is the criminal?

Yes. Gross negligence is difficult to prove in any case. If they felt they couldn’t prove it (the lawyer said she felt it had been constitutionally researched - it’s in the article) the they wouldn’t charge it. Hillary is not President, guys. Let it go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Gross negligence, in this case, is/was not difficult to prove.  And because she is not president means that it shouldnt be addressed?

It was addressed. No charges. And yes, who is president is more important than who might have been president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

It was addressed. No charges. And yes, who is president is more important than who might have been president.

NO charges because of what?  Who might have been president is irrelevant but the integrity of the system is what matters and I am quite sure that the system has been abused.  Since Lois Lerner was not indicted, can you HONESTLY tell me that she did nothing wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, UT alum said:

It was addressed. No charges. And yes, who is president is more important than who might have been president.

 

On 3/1/2019 at 7:45 AM, UT alum said:

Don’t want to talk about 2007 do you?

I’d say 2005 offers confirmation of Keynesian economic theory. We had about $3 trillion off the books government money pumped into the economy through a phony war. Bush pumped it up, then what happened?

 

Then why do you bring up 2007?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

Everyone knows that Hillary Clinton is more crooked than a dog’s hind leg. Can a lefty explain why she had to dump over 30,000 emails? There is no good answer for that. She has money running out of every orifice and she’s untouchable. Try to testify against her, you will wake up dead. Why doesn’t the left just simply admit that fact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,229
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aaronhicks
    Newest Member
    Aaronhicks
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      John Cornyn Will Be Primaried In 2026!

      By tvc184 · Posted

      I have no issue with that however…. Rick Perry, although seemingly not really popular even with Republicans, was almost impossible to beat. The Texas conservatives just needed that tough, real conservative with an already popular voting base. Someone that has been elected to both Texas state office and federal office.  Boom! In 2010 in steps Kay Bailey Hutchison, a popular sitting US Senator and former Texas Treasurer. So she has been elected, statewide in both a state political position and nationally as a senator. A Rasmussen poll in 2009 showed Hutchison with a 40% to 38% lead over Perry. She had high profile endorsements as did Perry. Hutchison was endorsed by the likes of G H W Bush, Nolan Ryan, Roger Staubach, etc. If people are actually going to listen to endorsements, those are some fairly well thought of people in Texas. Primary day was between Perry, Hutchison and Debra Medina. Hutchison was beaten by Perry 51% to 30% and he got enough votes to avoid a runoff. Obviously, that has no bearing on today. It does show that just because a person is very popular and already elected to national office from Texas such as Kay Bailey Hutchison, it does not ensure a good showing in the polls against an incumbent. It will be interesting for sure. 
    • ndn2016
      Can I get some respect now!!!. Woodville goes to state!!

      By ndn2016 · Posted

      R-E-S-P-E-C-T !!!
    • ndn2016
      De Kalb (12) vs Woodville (42) - FINAL

      By ndn2016 · Posted

      WOOHOO!!!! Great Job Eagles
    • ndn2016
      Texarkana Texas (28) vs Port Neches-Groves (31) - FINAL

      By ndn2016 · Posted

      WOW what a game. just got home, I'm gonna sleep with a big smile all night. PNG QB passes were spot on tonight, lil #17 freshman receiver had huge catches at critical times in the game. # 44 had a couple of huge catches including the 'jump pass' on 4th down for a touchdown.  #4 made big plays at key times on both sides of the ball, he is a beast. #11 played his usual consistent game with big time catches and a couple of good punts and a good job of just falling on a bobbled kick reception. #27 probably had 125 yards or so rushing. The defensive backs did a good job, bending but not breaking including the interception in the end zone. I thought the TH coaches messed up not trying to score with the high power players they have when they got the fumble right before half with 45 seconds or so on the clock and 3 TO left, if they would have scored then it would have broke our backs. I know it was 90 yards to go but they could cover the field in 3 or 4 plays. This is one of the most exciting wins in PNG's long history of exciting wins. Oh yeah kudos to the fans for getting in to the game at key times and in my Opinion making a big difference. 😂
    • Lamar1996
      Port Neches-Groves vs Texas High

      By Lamar1996 · Posted

      To the 41 individuals that picked TH…..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Round 4 here we come!  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...