Jump to content

Is it Trump who is disrespectful to women?


stevenash

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, UT alum said:

What the hell is that? A conservative attempt at humor? A photo mash up with made up commentary? If it’s farce, it’s a sad attempt. Or maybe it’s just hard to tell because of the farce at the head of our government.

I honestly think hanging out with Biden would be a blast... don't agree with his political leanings, though.  

The point is the guy has a well documented history of being ALL OVER the ladies.... will the media and the Dems give him pass?

This is from Gawker from 2015... not a conservative source.

This is the hidden content, please

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I honestly think hanging out with Biden would be a blast... don't agree with his political leanings, though.  

The point is the guy has a well documented history of being ALL OVER the ladies.... will the media and the Dems give him pass?

This is from Gawker from 2015... not a conservative source.

This is the hidden content, please

 

 

What does well documented mean?  If women come forth and start accusing him of sexual harassment, I don't think he'll get a pass. He'll have to answer.  But, I don't recall any accusations of impropriety against him.  What sort of source is Gawker? Comedy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, it's just laughable.... The D's proclaim themselves to be the party that every woman should be beholden to because they (The Ds) are all about womens' rights... except everybody pretends that Bill Clinton never happened.  Literally.... the guy who used his position of power to abuse an intern (and then lied to us all about it) is literally sitting in the front row.  His wife (who attacked all of his victims publicly, BTW) was chosen to represent the "obvious choice" that women across America should make in 2016.

Died in the wool party honks (left and right) might forget stuff like that, but the rest of us don't.  

As far as well-documented, just hit google. The pics speak for themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...