Jump to content

*Coach Of The Year?*


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Orangeboy

Mixon from Jasper. Led his team to the 3A title.

Coach Young also led his Texas City Stings to another district title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off the top of my head, this would seem to be a pretty good list of candidates (again, in alphabetical order)

Green (Vid) -  took program that was down and turned them into a playoff contender, forcing BH to 3 games in bi-district round.

Griff (LCM) - had 1 returning starter (his catcher) and wound up with the district champs before 1st round exit.

Hooker (High Is) - 1st playoff spot for 1A Cards since the 90s...including a district title.

Mixon (Jas) - in perhaps the most competitive of all area districts, they outlasted BC, HJ and Silsbee to become district champs.  Still alive in 3A.

Stalbaum (BH) - led team even after loss of starting SS to an outstanding year (marred only by 2nd place finish in district) and still kicking in the playoffs.

Are there others?  Sure.  Could this list change?  Sure. Someone runs the table and makes it to Austin/wins it (Bridge City?) and you may need to re-consider.  Good to debate now...good to debate at season's end.  Better than trying to pick the "worst coach of the year"...so many guys did a great job this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

High Island. HIGH ISLAND. HIGH ISLAND!!! Did I mention High Island? H-I won district with a total of 9 (count em', NINE) players.  :o If the H-I coach don't win it, something is wrong... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Orangeboy

  You have to be kidding about Bryant from bc right? That is plain ole talent there my friend.....

Bryant has had to do a lot more coaching this year, his team is very inexperienced. Give the guy at least a little credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent just makes a coaches job a little easier. Someone still has to be the one to decide how to use that talent. The use of two freshman and keeping guys motivated in BC speaks volumes of Bryant.

There are a ton of candidates out there and all would be a fine choice.

Just dont count out Bryant because he has talent. The Yankees are the most talented team in the league and last I checked they are 8 down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to defend him once more, and i know they were loaded with talent, but the Cards did reach state two years in a row..and they havent lost many games since hes been around.

cant just throw the guy out and say he doesnt do anything right when the cards have had the success they have over the years. many teams are loaded but go nowhere. he takes the talent and does the things to get BC where they are supposed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

I think Coach Hooker from High Island should get "Coach Of The Year" taking 9 kids and winnig a district championship is pretty impressive to me.

This unique situation called for more coaching than I can imagine. Some coaches can simply win with lots of talent. This guy pulled off what nearly amounts to a miracle. Too bad since its such a small & low profile school, he won't get the media accolades he deserves. Awesome job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This unique situation called for more coaching than I can imagine. Some coaches can simply win with lots of talent. This guy pulled off what nearly amounts to a miracle. Too bad since its such a small & low profile school, he won't get the media accolades he deserves. Awesome job!

He did do a great job with limited players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to quit bashing Billy Bryant.  His record speaks for itself.  Of course you have to have talent to make it to the state tournament!  How many other coaches in the area have been to the state tournament as head coach at two different schools.  When I first started coaching, an older baseball coach corrected me and said that his baseball team(6a in Oklahoma) took him to the state tournament not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the SETX districts isn't the Coach of the Year always from the team that won the district championship?

Even if they weren't automatically deemed Coach of the Year for this accomplishment, three district championship coaches this year come to mind:

Mixon from Jasper, District Champs against some very tough competition.

Terrier from Buna, District Champs, making things happen for Buna for the first time in a while.

Griffith from LCM, District Champs with one returning starter, pre-season rankings didn't place them to finish in the top half of their district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...