stevenash Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 Aside from "enlightenment", he is also omniscient. Simply amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 GAME OVER!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 We can add " delusions of grandeur" to "enlightened" and " omniscient" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 17 minutes ago, stevenash said: We can add " delusions of grandeur" to "enlightened" and " omniscient" There’s some other stuff I could add, but I’m sure Grad would give me the boot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 24 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: There’s some other stuff I could add, but I’m sure Grad would give me the boot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 What is it about liberals? They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years. It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged. Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position. Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now? baddog 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 6 hours ago, Hagar said: What is it about liberals? They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years. It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged. Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position. Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now? How does one obstruct a non-crime? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said: Same goes for republicans. Shrieking for years about Obama being a Muslim, Hillary’s emails, etc. Middle class blaming the poor people (lmao) while the real wealth gap continues to widen VSEO- Do you think Mr. Obama was overly sympathetic to Muslims? Do you think that the erased Hillary emails were about Yoga and grandchildren? Do you believe that the tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch was purely coincidental and, again, grandchildren talk was the subject of that meeting? Do you think that the government is the best, most efficient solution to the wealth gap issue? ( if you are as enlightened as you suggest, you will respond to these questions rather than employing another failed deflection technique) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 Real simple most liberals/Democrats won’t except FACTS. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said: You guys know democrats say the exact same thing about republicans right? And they’re supremely convinced they’re right, just like you republicans. They are also convinced they are enlightened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 1 hour ago, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said: Answer 1: Overly sympathetic? Well, compared to Trump. Sure Answer 2: No Answer 3: No Answer 4: No Thank you come again! Wow VSEO, you need to be careful with answers like that. There are liberals that will be calling you a racist, misogynist, inbred redneck for acknowledging truths that don't fit the Party line. I'm beginning to think you're not only the king of pot stirrers, but only a halfa$$ democrat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 19, 2019 Report Share Posted April 19, 2019 He considers himself a moral liberal and a fiscal conservative who has come to this board to show everyone the "folly of their ways" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted April 21, 2019 Report Share Posted April 21, 2019 On 4/19/2019 at 11:47 AM, VeryStableEnlightenedOne said: You guys know democrats say the exact same thing about republicans right? And they’re supremely convinced they’re right, just like you republicans. I’m only republican on certain issues so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 22, 2019 Report Share Posted April 22, 2019 On 4/19/2019 at 10:37 AM, 5GallonBucket said: Real simple most liberals/Democrats won’t except FACTS. You absolutely put the round in the X-ring with that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted April 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 On 4/19/2019 at 10:07 PM, Hagar said: What is it about liberals? They’ve lived and breathe Russian Collusion and Mueller’s Report for the last two years. It clears Trump, and they’re hollering rigged. Once their brains get something implanted, they ignore everything unless it affirms their position. Btw, wonder if UTalum regrets getting off now? No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss, five times without making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 9 minutes ago, UT alum said: No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss, five times without making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown. I believe it was Mr. Comey who said he didnt remember in excess of 200 times. Is that, somehow, different? Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 20 minutes ago, stevenash said: I believe it was Mr. Comey who said he didnt remember in excess of 200 times. Is that, somehow, different? I just now read UT Alum's post, and was all set to reply with a short, stinging exposure of his glaring TDS statement...but then read your reply. Mine was almost identical. In fact...yours is probably better, in that I was probably going to add the TDS aspect in schoolboy fashion. 27 minutes ago, UT alum said: No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss, five times without making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown. UT Alum, please answer Nash's pertinent question and explain how Trump can be a clown by forgetting 37 times, but Comey can plead ignorance 200+ times without such retribution or suspicion? In fact, please refute your obvious TDS symptoms by laying out a basis for your "clown" comment. Keep in mind that your "evidence" must apply across the board...in which your analysis will be understandably ridiculed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, UT alum said: No regrets, Hagar. Collusion has no meaning in the legal code. It’s called conspiracy, and has a high bar that Meuller couldn’t find enough evidence to bring charges. That’s part of why Barr’s press conference was a sham. He said no collusion parroting his boss, five times without making the conspiracy distinction once. Trump isn’t cleared of obstruction, just not charged. The report DID NOT exonerate him of obstruction. Read the report. But then again only the parts that you want to believe will be true, the rest witch hunt. I’m a third of the way through, and everything I’ve read has pretty much been reported already. So much for fake news. I think some of this needs Congressional investigation, but I don’t see the point in impeachment if there is no conviction, which there won’t be with 66 Senate votes required (I think). Investigation may reveal more corruption, however. I still say let 2020 decide. How does the man with a world class memory forget or fail to recall events related to his campaign 37 times. Guy’s still a clown. Welcome back. We just lost one liberal, so we needed a sub. But be careful of statements like the “Trump couldn’t recall or forgot 37 times”. He’s a stark amateur compared to Comey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 If I had around 20 high-priced veteran lawyers ready to pounce on my every word, and who I knew were not fans, and had a history of perjury traps, my number of "I don't recall" answers would be equal to the number of questions asked. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Englebert said: If I had around 20 high-priced veteran lawyers ready to pounce on my every word, and who I knew were not fans, and had a history of perjury traps, my number of "I don't recall" answers would be equal to the number of questions asked. This is the correct answer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Is it just me, or does Strzok look like he’s a victim of demonic possession? If the eyes are the gateway to the soul, his is very dark and evil looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 31 minutes ago, Hagar said: Is it just me, or does Strzok look like he’s a victim of demonic possession? If the eyes are the gateway to the soul, his is very dark and evil looking. Anyone who ventures into a Walmart and claims they can smell the candidate of choice must be possessed by something. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Just another leftie who thinks he is smarter than everyone else and condescends constantly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.