Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know Griff and Landry very well and from what I know they have a great relationship.   I would very seriously doubt that Griff turned them in.  He would not have any clue that the kid had played too many games.  He is too busy worrying about his own team.  The only people who could know that this happened would be BC coaches or fans that have been to all of the games.  No one else has a clue how many games any kid has played on varsity and on JV.  I would put all of my money on someone in RED being the person who turned the violation in.  It could have even been Landry if he realized he made the mistake.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

I know Griff and Landry very well and from what I know they have a great relationship.   I would very seriously doubt that Griff turned them in.  He would not have any clue that the kid had played too many games.  He is too busy worrying about his own team.  The only people who could know that this happened would be BC coaches or fans that have been to all of the games.  No one else has a clue how many games any kid has played on varsity and on JV.  I would put all of my money on someone in RED being the person who turned the violation in.  It could have even been Landry if he realized he made the mistake.

Geesh.....all your money ....I don’t know what your worth but it would be less after that bet 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

By someone in RED I meant someone from Bridge city not HJ 

Do you really think someone (parent ) fan etc would lookup all the info on game changer or even know how to do it .....not easy btw or even know the exact play rules to go after I can assure you they don’t this process was not easy to put together as well as being malicious and vindictive .....read my earlier post was 256 page report ....     

Posted
26 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

I know Griff and Landry very well and from what I know they have a great relationship.   I would very seriously doubt that Griff turned them in.  He would not have any clue that the kid had played too many games.  He is too busy worrying about his own team.  The only people who could know that this happened would be BC coaches or fans that have been to all of the games.  No one else has a clue how many games any kid has played on varsity and on JV.  I would put all of my money on someone in RED being the person who turned the violation in.  It could have even been Landry if he realized he made the mistake.

You re right!  Coach Landry sent it in under anonymous.  Wow.  

Posted
30 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

I know Griff and Landry very well and from what I know they have a great relationship.   I would very seriously doubt that Griff turned them in.  He would not have any clue that the kid had played too many games.  He is too busy worrying about his own team.  The only people who could know that this happened would be BC coaches or fans that have been to all of the games.  No one else has a clue how many games any kid has played on varsity and on JV.  I would put all of my money on someone in RED being the person who turned the violation in.  It could have even been Landry if he realized he made the mistake.

I'll take that bet!!!!!!!! How much are we talking about? lol

Posted
13 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

I see the anonymous so not a self report.  I just don’t see how any coach would have the info from all the jv games.   Only a parent or bc coach would have that info.  

Game changer 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Cardinals1661 said:

I see the anonymous so not a self report.  I just don’t see how any coach would have the info from all the jv games.   Only a parent or bc coach would have that info.  

Nope, all it takes is a $2.99/month subscription to Game Changer

Posted
29 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Nope, all it takes is a $2.99/month subscription to Game Changer

You can also get dat free trial period.

However, I'm all about dat Premium Service for $7.00 per month. We rollin' in the money here in the Dirty Bay.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

You can also get dat free trial period.

However, I'm all about dat Premium Service for $7.00 per month. We rollin' in the money here in the Dirty Bay.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Well, I figured since the $2.99 gives you everything that the premium does, I'd prefer to use the $5 to go toward a burger over at Ricky's.

Posted

Okay Griff did it. But if he did that is pretty good work to manage to keep up with your current team and Bridge City's team from a game changer app. I mean the BC coaches cant keep up how many times a kid plays? That seems pretty simple it self. So I salute you Coach Griff for keeping Bridge City honest and knowing the rules of the game of baseball. GREAT JOB! That's probably one reason you have over 600 wins. So I guess this will add another win to the column..

Posted
17 minutes ago, LC-M said:

Okay Griff did it. But if he did that is pretty good work to manage to keep up with your current team and Bridge City's team from a game changer app. I mean the BC coaches cant keep up how many times a kid plays? That seems pretty simple it self. So I salute you Coach Griff for keeping Bridge City honest and knowing the rules of the game of baseball. GREAT JOB! That's probably one reason you have over 600 wins. So I guess this will add another win to the column..

Well, whoever did report showed the 22-4A DEC evidence that warranted that BC forfeit 3 games.  That is really the only thing that counts.

If he did (and again, my source did say it was)........SO WHAT?  As I said last night, it could be argued that he had a duty under UIL rules to report it on finding out.  There was no finding that whoever reported the violations withheld the information after finding out.  Whoever reported it certainly, according to the vote of the 22-4A DEC, did not report false allegations.

So all of the talk of who reported it is really neither here nor there.  In fact, the talk being entirely in that direction would normally cause me to close a thread like this.  However, as I was reminded last night, this is the most activity that has been in the forum all freaking season!

Posted
5 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Well, whoever did report showed the 22-4A DEC evidence that warranted that BC forfeit 3 games.  That is really the only thing that counts.

If he did (and again, my source did say it was)........SO WHAT?  As I said last night, it could be argued that he had a duty under UIL rules to report it on finding out.  There was no finding that whoever reported the violations withheld the information after finding out.  Whoever reported it certainly, according to the vote of the 22-4A DEC, did not report false allegations.

So all of the talk of who reported it is really neither here nor there.  In fact, the talk being entirely in that direction would normally cause me to close a thread like this.  However, as I was reminded last night, this is the most activity that has been in the forum all freaking season!

At this point I don’t care. I’m hear for jokes and laughs. To be honest I don’t think anyone in our district will get past the 3rd round and I think our district overall is down. I’m sorry to hear about your WOS DC championship stop recruiting players lol

Posted

I didn’t think they would keep jv stats on game changer so I stand corrected from that point.  So if you go on game changer and add them up he is over the 17 game limit?  It is that simple?  Some of y’all have checked that?   

Posted
24 minutes ago, LC-M said:

At this point I don’t care. I’m hear for jokes and laughs. To be honest I don’t think anyone in our district will get past the 3rd round and I think our district overall is down. I’m sorry to hear about your WOS DC championship stop recruiting players lol

That's fine, LC-M has managed 1 win on the gridiron against WO-S since then.

BTW, the forfeitures in 1992 were not due to "recruiting violations."

Posted
7 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

That's fine, LC-M has managed 1 win on the gridiron against WO-S since then.

BTW, the forfeitures in 1992 were not due to "recruiting violations."

What was it for? I really don’t know. Were you playing on the team then?

Posted
4 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

The report was for using  player that was ineligible due to an incomplete on his report card.

Oh ok over here in the greener pastures you always here WOS is playing 21 year olds or they recruited a player from a Spring school. I don’t keep up with all that. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, LC-M said:

Oh ok over here in the greener pastures you always here WOS is playing 21 year olds or they recruited a player from a Spring school. I don’t keep up with all that. 

I've heard that kind of talk since I attended there in the mid 80's.  This is despite the fact all of those kids who were supposedly recruited are sons, brothers, cousins or nephews of folks I attended WO-S with.  They want to say that to somehow dismiss WO-S' success or to explain their school's failure.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...