Jump to content

Who Wins 21-4A?


Who Wins 21-4A?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Wins 21-4A?

    • Barbers Hill
      10
    • Huffman
      3
    • Galena Park
      5
    • Crosby
      14
    • C.E. King
      0
    • New Caney
      7
    • Forest Brook
      2
    • Smiley
      2


Recommended Posts

Who will win this district and why?

Huffman of course who else? Sorry boys got one playing sorta of excited bc waited a long time.  ;D If I were picking would go something like this:

Crosby

New Caney

Galena Park

I hope we can go 5-5 this year which would be a huge step for us over what happen last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta go with the Brook.

They have a junior tailback that will be a junior that can outright FLY. If they can kep the wheels from falling off like last year but tough task. They are are having many problems right now within NFISD. Coach Lawson is a good man and maybe he can get back this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No BH?

Well, I don't know Coop - BH is always tuff - they have a great coaching staff and a rich winning tradition so they are always in the hunt - but it looks like they lost a ton to graduation - with only 5 starters coming back they have their work cut out - but you never know with the Hill cause they are a good bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crosby, but BH won't go down easy and I will go out on a limb and say C.E. King is going to make a showing this year. Coach Malkowski over there is a good guy, if he can get talent to match his intensity they could become a force in 21-4A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, I don't know Coop - BH is always tuff - they have a great coaching staff and a rich winning tradition so they are always in the hunt - but it looks like they lost a ton to graduation - with only 5 starters coming back they have their work cut out - but you never know with the Hill cause they are a good bunch.

We've had this discussion before on here. BH is only returning 5 "starters" but there are about 15 kids that played on varsity and got good playing time. Its not like theres 5 kids left over from the whole team last year. I think its a misconception that BH doesnt have experience. I may be wrong, but I think BH will raise some brows with the their success. Alot of names will be new or unfamiliar, but I personally think they will be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've had this discussion before on here. BH is only returning 5 "starters" but there are about 15 kids that played on varsity and got good playing time. Its not like theres 5 kids left over from the whole team last year. I think its a misconception that BH doesnt have experience. I may be wrong, but I think BH will raise some brows with the their success. Alot of names will be new or unfamiliar, but I personally think they will be ok.

Pawpaw - I know that Sexton will be a force to reckon with - but what are some other strengths and weaknesses of BH this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...