Jump to content

PAM's season


pakronos

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

It's funny.  They had NONE of those issues last week at all.  I don't known what could've changed in less than a week.

the excitability and emotions on teen age boys KNOWING they are better than last year getting to showcase their talant against a local foe...They settled down in the second half. next week might be the same results. they will start off shakey, but rebound

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

He a jinx, he gotta go. Imma tell the old ladies at the gate to not let him in Friday, midgets can't climb high fences so if we close em we should be okay. :)

 

I think if we lose to United he should have to have United's avatar rest of the season until state is done: and im talking bout San Antonio. 😎

just calling it as i see it and how past PAM teams were. if they roll easy in scrimmages and preseason (last time was the hines years), they steam roll through everyone to  a 3rd rd playoff appearance...dont see it in this group. the only kids i see playing hard was the wr's and Cheney. and he starting a bunch of sophmores tonight lol...he making it seem like it's a punishment to the starters the way it was worded in the paper, but its because we are banged up on defense!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2019 at 12:39 PM, BoGip7387 said:

This team has to grow, they had only 2 retuning starters on the defense a corner and a D lineman, 2 on the O line, and a Sophomore QB. They looked very inexperienced last week. They will get better as the season moves on, they will be fine and if they don't....it's not the end of the world, I'm all in.

If you remember in 2015, Kenny Ray did the same thing Morgan is doing at the QB position. We all remember how that turned out(back to back 3-7 seasons before moving down to 5A) Maybe not the smartest thing to do. This team reminds me of the 2016 team but not as much complete athletes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
    • payton missed dunk , and they go get a layup that play hurt 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...