Week 5 State Rankings

[AggiesAreWe]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

6A

#5 North Shore

#9 Beaumont West Brook

 

5A DII

#5 A&M Consolidated

#6 Huntsville

#8 Port Neches-Groves

 

4A DII

#3 West Orange-Stark

 

3A DI

#9 Diboll

 

3A DII

#1 Newton

 

2A DI

#4 San Augustine

 

2A DII

#5 Grapeland

 

1A DII

#3 Oakwood

 

 

 

 

[aTmfan06]

#8 seems pretty high for PNG or am I wrong ?

[CCRed]

49 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

#8 seems pretty high for PNG or am I wrong ?

Seems very high for anyone in that district. 

[ballwatch]

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

6A

#5 North Shore

#9 Beaumont West Brook

 

5A DII

#5 A&M Consolidated

#6 Huntsville

#8 Port Neches-Groves

 

4A DII

#3 West Orange-Stark

 

3A DI

#9 Diboll

 

3A DII

#1 Newton

 

2A DI

#4 San Augustine

 

2A DII

#5 Grapeland

 

1A DII

#3 Oakwood

 

 

 

 

I’m not sure where you draw your boundaries but I see you noted Diboll at #9 in 3A.  Diboll is roughly 10 miles south of Lufkin who comes in at #5 in 5A D1.  

[WOSgrad]

8 minutes ago, ballwatch said:

I’m not sure where you draw your boundaries but I see you noted Diboll at #9 in 3A.  Diboll is roughly 10 miles south of Lufkin who comes in at #5 in 5A D1.  

Diboll is currently in a district with Coldspring-Oakhurst a team that has been part of the SETXsports coverage area since its inception.  I know of no such current relationship with Lufkin. 

Although if this would have happened in 2016-17 when Lufkin and West Brook were in the same district, he would have listed it.

[AggiesAreWe]

9 minutes ago, ballwatch said:

I’m not sure where you draw your boundaries but I see you noted Diboll at #9 in 3A.  Diboll is roughly 10 miles south of Lufkin who comes in at #5 in 5A D1.  

Diboll is in a district that we cover.

Same as Huntsville and A&M Consol. They are in a district that we cover.

Lufkin currently is not in a district that we cover.

Like Grad stated, had the realignment stayed the same as last time when Lufkin was in a district with West Brook, they would be considered in our coverage area.

[Bulldogs92]

Jasper took quite a hit after the loss to Diboll and DCTF only has us by 32 over a really bad LaMarque team. I think they're underrating Diboll, too. Those dudes are legit...

[WOSgrad]

9 minutes ago, Bulldogs92 said:

Jasper took quite a hit after the loss to Diboll and DCTF only has us by 32 over a really bad LaMarque team. I think they're underrating Diboll, too. Those dudes are legit...

I noticed that as well.  I mean I expected them to take a drop but all the way out of the top 10 was a bit much.

[Bulldogs92]

14 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

I noticed that as well.  I mean I expected them to take a drop but all the way out of the top 10 was a bit much.

That's alright. We'll see if we belong there after we play you guys. If we lose, I won't have anything more to say about any rankings. 

[png9mon]

2 hours ago, aTmfan06 said:

#8 seems pretty high for PNG or am I wrong ?

 

1 hour ago, CCRed said:

Seems very high for anyone in that district. 

You are not wrong & is way too high for anyone in this district! (PNG is good, not great.)

[ballwatch]

51 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Diboll is currently in a district with Coldspring-Oakhurst a team that has been part of the SETXsports coverage area since its inception.  I know of no such current relationship with Lufkin. 

Although if this would have happened in 2016-17 when Lufkin and West Brook were in the same district, he would have listed it.

Makes sense! Thanks 

[ballwatch]

48 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Diboll is in a district that we cover.

Same as Huntsville and A&M Consol. They are in a district that we cover.

Lufkin currently is not in a district that we cover.

Like Grad stated, had the realignment stayed the same as last time when Lufkin was in a district with West Brook, they would be considered in our coverage area.

I gotcha, thanks!