Jump to content

Sub- Varsity

MustangNation#1

By MustangNation#1
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Knoddy1 said:

I thought so, PNG's freshmen "A" are always pretty good and that score didn't seem to fit.

LCM fresh team is pretty good. I don’t know if that’s PNG a or b team. But with the merge with little cypress and Mauriceville together in high school They are doing good. Our Jr highs are separate. I don’t know why it’s surprising we beat them the last 2 times we have played them in district at the varsity level. We beat them 2012 35-7 and 2013 35-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chief1987

chief1987

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LC-M said:

LCM fresh team is pretty good. I don’t know if that’s PNG a or b team. But with the merge with little cypress and Mauriceville together in high school They are doing good. Our Jr highs are separate. I don’t know why it’s surprising we beat them the last 2 times we have played them in district at the varsity level. We beat them 2012 35-7 and 2013 35-14

That’s a long time ago. These boys put a whooping on them bears last year as 8th graders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, chief1987 said:

That’s a long time ago. These boys put a whooping on them bears last year as 8th graders. 

They might have last year. But since we have combined the freshmen team this year are a lot better. But at the end of the day its sub varsity and most the time it don’t translate to varsity ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LC-M said:

They might have last year. But since we have combined the freshmen team this year are a lot better. But at the end of the day its sub varsity and most the time it don’t translate to varsity ball. 

I’m afraid, in this particular case, it does.

PN-G sub & Varsity have no problem with the LC-M ranks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
Just now, LC-M said:

Whatever you want to believe. 

Honestly, I wish LC-M varsity could compete with the likes of PN-G. They can’t. A couple years ago I posted about winning programs like Newton, WO-S, PN-G and what they have that makes them winners... Schools like LC-M, Lumberton, Bridge City have never been able to figure out the formula. I’ll bet on The Indians over them Bears every time, and I’ll guarantee you that I’ll come out ahead...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SmashMouth said:

Honestly, I wish LC-M varsity could compete with the likes of PN-G. They can’t. A couple years ago I posted about winning programs like Newton, WO-S, PN-G and what they have that makes them winners... Schools like LC-M, Lumberton, Bridge City have never been able to figure out the formula. I’ll bet on The Indians over them Bears every time, and I’ll guarantee you that I’ll come out ahead...

I believe the series is led by PNG 11-7. To me that’s really Not lopsided. If you were saying WOS I’d agree with you.  But we suit up 30 kids they suit up a lot more. Not to knock PNG but there are a average 5A. If it was Aledo or Highland park I could see your point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldman

oldman

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LC-M said:

I believe the series is led by PNG 11-7. To me that’s really Not lopsided. If you were saying WOS I’d agree with you.  But we suit up 30 kids they suit up a lot more. Not to knock PNG but there are a average 5A. If it was Aledo or Highland park I could see your point. 

If PNG is average then that obviously makes LCM WELL BELOW AVERAGE!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LC-M said:

I believe the series is led by PNG 11-7. To me that’s really Not lopsided. If you were saying WOS I’d agree with you.  But we suit up 30 kids they suit up a lot more. Not to knock PNG but there are a average 5A. If it was Aledo or Highland park I could see your point. 

Well, I am a numbers guy... 11 is approximately 57% more than 7.

57% is more than 1/2 (do you see where I'm going with this?) That is lopsided!...

I don't wanna hear that same ole whiny crap about "they suit up more than...blah, blah, blah....vomit". If you need to suit up more kids then that's your school's/community's/coach's/parents'/kids fault. Get more kids to play sports - football in particular. Newton plays about as good a ball as anyone in this area - wouldn't you agree? They beat Silsbee by 3 scores. They beat WO-S. Do you think Newton uses that sickening excuse of being a smaller school or not suiting up as many kids? No! The difference is they refuse to accept mediocrity like LC-M does (among many other programs - not singling LC-M out). Winning is a culture. It's not something that happens by chance.

Since this is just a Sub-Varsity thread, I will save my "Winning is a Culture" soliloquy for another time... Meanwhile, please realize that with comments like "11-7...(is) really NOT lopsided..." is proof positive that you're complacent with mediocrity. You're actually trying to say that 11 losses and 7 wins ain't that bad...disgusting. I'm sorry, but it is vulgar in my eyes to accept mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

PNG is a long way from being the caliber  team that Newton and WO-S are. Being good and thinking you're good are two different things.

I don't agree/disagree with your viewpoint; however, I was replying to LC-M that Little Cypress could not compete with the likes of winners like Newton, WO-S and PN-G. I am not trying to argue the point that PN-G is the same caliber as the other 2 programs (although many will argue that they are). I will say that for a school with a resume like this, they are a winning program (like my post stated):

Overall record (approx.): 600-350-33 (not exact) 

3 State Championships, 6 State Final appearances, 8 Semifinal appearances, 10 Quarterfinal appearances, 15 Regional, 10 Area, 30 Bi-District appearances (12 of them in the last 16 years in case you want to know about recent accomplishments), 27 District Championships (including the last 4 years 2015-2018 in case you want to know about recent accomplishments).

I tried to find the list of LC-M Football accomplishments for a comparison, but I couldn't find any... Can someone please post similar LC-M stats for a comparison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...