Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, H3llR4z0r said:

All I can tell you, is in the previous hearing by the DEC, 3 districts voted, and 3 abstained. New evidence has surfaced, supposedly, that led to another DEC meeting in which all 6 voted. I do know which 2 schools brought it up. But, the information is coming from certain people in Mount Vernon. Apparently not everyone is on board with Briles being there. 

 

Just now, H3llR4z0r said:

Haha that qoute was all messed up. I didn't realize that you were qouting someone else. 

I am messing up all sort of quotes myself. 

How much do you think those Mt V kids going and acting fools at the Jefferson vs Hugh Springs game made the fence sitters about Briles (within the other districts) say we are not playing this game no more? 

Posted
Just now, jv_coach said:

 

I am messing up all sort of quotes myself. 

How much do you think those Mt V kids going and acting fools at the Jefferson vs Hugh Springs game made the fence sitters about Briles (within the other districts) say we are not playing this game no more? 

 

Very possible. They're definitely not making it easy on themselves. The guy is a walking target. You get move-ins from across the country, go undefeated, then some players start showing their hind ends. Making enemies of the state lol. 

Posted

This is from a poster off the Smokey.com forum.  Sums it up perfectly:  "Here’s another thought.  Briles may not have recruited these kids.  His name and legacy speak volumes without him saying a word.  Who’s to say these kids didn’t just move in to play for this guy and get the best out of their athletic career?  

Just a thought."

Posted
Just now, Reagan said:

This is from a poster off the Smokey.com forum.  Sums it up perfectly:  "Here’s another thought.  Briles may not have recruited these kids.  His name and legacy speak volumes without him saying a word.  Who’s to say these kids didn’t just move in to play for this guy and get the best out of their athletic career?  

Just a thought."

And then again, he could have recruited them.

Posted
45 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

And then again, he could have recruited them.

Also true!  But the original statement seems very plausible.  Think about it.  What kid wouldn't want to play for an elite coach like Briles?  This opportunity doesn't get tossed in ones lap often.

Posted

Having a coach who Is not getting paid by the school, and has connections to the reason why the the starting QB and WR moved in for “academic” reasons is the problem. They may have crossed all i’s and dotted all the t’s with the move ins but not with the coach who is making a movie (not a lie) about the whole situation. 

This is the hidden content, please

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...