Jump to content

Bi district LCM vs Stafford


Tiger33

Recommended Posts

I like Crouch, but he coaches not to lose. If LCM gets down by two scores, it a wrap because he'll call plays to minimize the damage instead of taking the chances needed to get back in the game.

That Henderson game a few years ago frustrated me to no end. Not to say that LCM could have come back and won, but his play calling killed any chance of making it interesting.

That said, this is probably the best stretch of Bear football since he was on David Williams staff in the 90s. They get to the playoffs somewhat consistently and win every now and then. 

I wish I could say the same up here in my adopted hometown. Go Bears!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BearEssentials97 said:

I like Crouch, but he coaches not to lose. If LCM gets down by two scores, it a wrap because he'll call plays to minimize the damage instead of taking the chances needed to get back in the game.

That Henderson game a few years ago frustrated me to no end. Not to say that LCM could have come back and won, but his play calling killed any chance of making it interesting.

That said, this is probably the best stretch of Bear football since he was on David Williams staff in the 90s. They get to the playoffs somewhat consistently and win every now and then. 

I wish I could say the same up here in my adopted hometown. Go Bears!

Crouch hasn’t been calling the plays on offense. He actually has been adjusting our defense the last 2 weeks. Our wing T specialist OC has been calling plays. If things don’t change I’ll have a adopted town too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LC-M said:

Crouch hasn’t been calling the plays on offense. He actually has been adjusting our defense the last 2 weeks. Our wing T specialist OC has been calling plays. If things don’t change I’ll have a adopted town too.

As head coach, you're responsible for what gets called. At anytime, he can overrule a playcall.

The coordinator takes his cues and actions based on his boss's philosophy.  The coordinator is doing what the coach wants

Your argument doesn't absolve Crouch from being conservative when the situation calls for boldness. That's just who he is. And that's not a problem except for a few plays on a few Fridays in the fall.

That said, he's winning games, he's been in the LCM family for a long time and the Bears could do worse, and have, with coaching.

One could make the argument they're not getting their money's worth if you want to compare salaries with the outstanding gentleman across town (I hate they publicize teacher salaries, they're doing the Lord's work and and are severely underpaid and unless they're making more than 100k, then it should be public information, but that's another gripe. I consider coaches to be teachers, even the athletic director that just coaches football because he's teaching life lessons), but goal is to get to the playoffs and he does that. Why y'all want to run him off every other year, I don't understand it. 

You could be like me, going to basketball scrimmages to play against schools without football teams that are in basketball shape while we haven't had a good practice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BearEssentials97 said:

As head coach, you're responsible for what gets called. At anytime, he can overrule a playcall.

The coordinator takes his cues and actions based on his boss's philosophy.  The coordinator is doing what the coach wants

Your argument doesn't absolve Crouch from being conservative when the situation calls for boldness. That's just who he is. And that's not a problem except for a few plays on a few Fridays in the fall.

That said, he's winning games, he's been in the LCM family for a long time and the Bears could do worse, and have, with coaching.

One could make the argument they're not getting their money's worth if you want to compare salaries with the outstanding gentleman across town (I hate they publicize teacher salaries, they're doing the Lord's work and and are severely underpaid and unless they're making more than 100k, then it should be public information, but that's another gripe. I consider coaches to be teachers, even the athletic director that just coaches football because he's teaching life lessons), but goal is to get to the playoffs and he does that. Why y'all want to run him off every other year, I don't understand it. 

You could be like me, going to basketball scrimmages to play against schools without football teams that are in basketball shape while we haven't had a good practice. 

Well he hasn’t wore a headset all year to know what play is gonna be called. I think he’s a good guy but lacks leadership. I won’t blast him on here over his leadership issues that im aware of.Trust me WOS was happy to see him leave,  I’m happy to see someone Is for the guy because I know there are a lot of unhappy folks in Little Cypress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BearEssentials97 said:

I like Crouch, but he coaches not to lose. If LCM gets down by two scores, it a wrap because he'll call plays to minimize the damage instead of taking the chances needed to get back in the game.

That Henderson game a few years ago frustrated me to no end. Not to say that LCM could have come back and won, but his play calling killed any chance of making it interesting.

That said, this is probably the best stretch of Bear football since he was on David Williams staff in the 90s. They get to the playoffs somewhat consistently and win every now and then. 

I wish I could say the same up here in my adopted hometown. Go Bears!

That's only because they're putting 4 teams in instead of 3 like it used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LC-M said:

Yep some people thinks it okay to make a bi district and be a 5-5 program on consistent basis. He has one 7-3 season team that’s been about it 

Losing the Lumberton game was bad and cost a chance at an easier path to the area round. That kind of result is extremely frustrating.

But he seems to get the team to the playoffs. And outside of Livingston and Splendora, everyone you played this year made the playoffs. It was a good schedule.

It has been worse on Bear Path. They will never be WOS. But they should be competitive every year. And from the looks of it now, they are. All it takes is a win or two in the playoffs to change the perception of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BearEssentials97 said:

Losing the Lumberton game was bad and cost a chance at an easier path to the area round. That kind of result is extremely frustrating.

But he seems to get the team to the playoffs. And outside of Livingston and Splendora, everyone you played this year made the playoffs. It was a good schedule.

It has been worse on Bear Path. They will never be WOS. But they should be competitive every year. And from the looks of it now, they are. All it takes is a win or two in the playoffs to change the perception of the season. 

They will never be WOS.“

They could be. Wouldn’t be easy, wouldn’t be quick, but I refuse to place limits on anything because of perception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

They will never be WOS.“

They could be. Wouldn’t be easy, wouldn’t be quick, but I refuse to place limits on anything because of perception. 

WOS has tradition of winning. The BearE97 is happy with mediocre LCM football because LCM has been WOS little brother. We have a winning record against everyone else in Orange County. I agree LCM could be more competitive. Some years we don’t have the talent that WOS does but we could be a lot better. Few years ago I posted the reason why our HC still is working at LCM is because of the past superintendent. It was said that as long as LCM make a bi district playoff appearance in football the perception would look good. A bi district playoff game imo is nothing to me. 3 to 4 rounds a consistent basis is a good program. I just have more expectations for the staff and kids. Here is a list of reasons LCM struggles:

#1 PARENTS...... we have some participation trophy parents. They don’t support the program and lean to the band program. They don’t motivate their kids to play or send them to camps. Get the  kids in the weight room  And off of video games. I could go on but everyone gets it.

 

#2  talent. Some years we are up and down. We are not blessed like a power house teamp. But the kids need a taste of winning and get some tradition started. Hit the gym!

#3 Coaching. A topic where everyone you ask has a different opinion. I’ll say this LCM has had good coaches but if the kids don’t believe in the coaches it’s hard to win and buy into the program. Winning coaches are more successful because of this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2019 at 6:24 PM, LC-M said:

Yep some people thinks it okay to make a bi district and be a 5-5 program on consistent basis. He has one 7-3 season team that’s been about it 

To furthur add to that. Had they did 4 teams back then moody wouldve made it in 06. If that doesnt say how bad that can be... lol We lost to Nederland by 2 for 3rd place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LC-M said:

BOJO! I heard Moody was a good guy just not a good coach. I would like to see LCM have little more success in football. 

I think with brister now in charge we'll be in a lot better shape. Shes super competitive and wants to win... mediocre wont cut it long.... Im hoping once bickham leaves they give hunter Gonzales the reigns calling the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

I think with brister now in charge we'll be in a lot better shape. Im hoping once bickham leaves they give hunter Gonzales the reigns calling the offense. 

Well if Crouch retires and they hire new HC  might bring his own people in. But I agree Brister is a lot better than Polly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • LaPoyner 46 Buna 37 6:17 4th Buna was down 20 or so, but are on a run.
    • Bessent joined  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (SFM) in 1991 and was a partner there throughout the 1990s, eventually becoming head of the London office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  In 1992, Bessent was a leading member of the team whose bet on the  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  collapse of the British  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up garnered over $1 billion for the firm. His bet against the Japanese  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  in 2013 brought additional profit. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up After resigning from SFM in 2000, Bessent founded a $1 billion hedge fund. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  The fund closed in 2005. Bessent has said he learned that he should not change his style or the construct of the firm because of investor preferences. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He was also a senior investment advisor at fund-of-funds  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Bessent returned to Soros Fund Management and was chief investment officer from 2011 to 2015. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He left in 2015 to begin a new firm, Key Square Group. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Key Square Group Bessent founded Key Square Group in 2015 with Michael Germino, who had been the global head of capital markets at SFM. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square uses  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  and economics to make macro investments. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square received a $2 billion anchor investment from  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  At the end of 2017, Key Square's assets were $5.1 billion. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square's main fund returns increased by 13% in 2016 but lost money or broke even every year from 2017 to 2021 before making major gains in 2021, 2022 and 2023. The inconsistent track record scared away clients. Assets under management shrank from $5.1 billion in 2017 to $577 million in 2023 and the number of institutional investors declined from 180 to 20 over the same period. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up As part of a pre-arranged deal, the firm returned in 2018 the Soros capital as it took in other assets. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Its investors include Australia's sovereign wealth fund,  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Uh oh MAGAS, any issues with this? Scott Bessent Seems to be textbook deep state with the soros affiliation.    Bond markets, and my investment accounts,  are liking the pick so far with rates down as investors breathe a sigh of relief. Reportedly he will take a softer approach to tariffs, which are inflationary and pass throughs to consumers, as all 1.5 of us on SETX know 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...