Democrats Embrace the Godless

[BS Wildcats]

8 hours ago, UT alum said:

I don’t condemn murder. Can you cite the statute criminalizing a woman’s right to choose?

Murder is murder, I don't care what a libtard written law says.

[5GallonBucket]

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Murder is murder, I don't care what a libtard written law says.

Exactly

[5GallonBucket]

With his mindset if a law said it was ok for adults to have sex with children (Muslims for example)he d be ok with it because it’s the law.  
 

what a great way to think.  
 

 

[BS Wildcats]

37 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

With his mindset if a law said it was ok for adults to have sex with children (Muslims for example)he d be ok with it because it’s the law.  
 

what a great way to think.  
 

 

A truly flawed mindset

[LumRaiderFan]

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

Keep them humanely with an effective system to reunite them when the legalities are settled.

That’s what’s happening.  No one is drinking from a toilet.  You’re buying into the lies from the democrats.

If you are in favor of abortion, (right to CHOOSE) you can’t really be too concerned about how kids are treated at the border.

 

[BS Wildcats]

10 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

That’s what’s happening.  No one is drinking from a toilet.  You’re buying into the lies from the democrats.

If you are in favor of abortion, (right to CHOOSE) you can’t really be too concerned about how kids are treated at the border.

 

I'd call it a right to MURDER, no matter what some what to call it.

[LumRaiderFan]

42 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

I'd call it a right to MURDER, no matter what some what to call it.

These “pro-choice” libs make me sick.

Save the whales, save the elephants, save the planet...kill the babies, no problem.

[5GallonBucket]

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

That’s what’s happening.  No one is drinking from a toilet.  You’re buying into the lies from the democrats.

If you are in favor of abortion, (right to CHOOSE) you can’t really be too concerned about how kids are treated at the border.

 

 

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

These “pro-choice” libs make me sick.

Save the whales, save the elephants, save the planet...kill the babies, no problem.

A party of contradictions 

a party s platform full of holes

a party of confusion

[Hagar]

14 hours ago, Whoa said:

Great comment.  Show me the facts on the unprincipled office holder.

Let's not forget Bill Clinton,  Obbamy, Nixon oh!!! how about JFK??

If you are a working man/women or business owner - ANYTHING OTHER  than a Personal Injury lawlesser why would you not favor Trump - interest rates low, jobs up, market record gains, trying to keep the illegals out

Specifically, what has he done bad and  unprincipled????

Did I overlook a post, or did you get crickets on this?   🦗🦗🦗

Perhaps UT Alum needs to train his legal eye on the activities in the Dem controlled HOR.  There’s plenty of bad and unprincipled activities going on there.

[Hagar]

And one last point.  I have to acknowledge the fact that UT Alum has not disputed the Godless claim.  How could he, the Dem Party embraced it, and him being just another sheep, follows along.  Of course, this was only the icing on the cake.  It was obvious when the Dems booed God at their 2012 Convention.  

The fact that they’re Godless, explains why they approve of abortion.  Why they embrace homosexuality, multiple genders, and perversion.  Why they want to make slaves of all Americans under the guise of being “caring”.   Saddest part, imo, is the folks who believe in God, but remain Democrat.  

[UT alum]

19 hours ago, stevenash said:

Sorry, back at you wont work.  If you are going to lob the allegations, you need to substantiate them.  Its easy for me to call you a child molester but nobody cares unless I can offer something more than the allegation.

 

And when you have no facts, attack whom you dont like

I believe sworn testimony. Why you think Sondland changed his tune?

[Whoa]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

I believe sworn testimony. Why you think Sondland changed his tune?

How about the statement UNPRICIPLED office holder??

Sworn testimony like Bill's "I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS..."  or Obammys birth place???

You can be a yellow dog Democrat   Just say so. it's okay

 

[stevenash]

11 hours ago, UT alum said:

I believe sworn testimony. Why you think Sondland changed his tune?

Then you believe the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford?   Did you believe the sworn testimony of O.J. Simpson?  What about the head of Ukraine saying he felt no pressure from Trump?

[Hagar]

6 hours ago, stevenash said:

Then you believe the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford?   Did you believe the sworn testimony of O.J. Simpson?  What about the head of Ukraine saying he felt no pressure from Trump?

That’ll be another 🦗🦗🦗

[UT alum]

9 hours ago, stevenash said:

Then you believe the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford?   Did you believe the sworn testimony of O.J. Simpson?  What about the head of Ukraine saying he felt no pressure from Trump?

Here we go again. What about Ford? That was recalling stuff from 30 years ago, so while it may of been her recollection, it was too long ago to be reliable. That doesn’t make her a liar. As for what about OJ, all I can say is, he was acquitted, so what difference does that make? Lastly, as for what about Zelensky, was he under oath? I think not.

[UT alum]

18 hours ago, Whoa said:

How about the statement UNPRICIPLED office holder??

Sworn testimony like Bill's "I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS..."  or Obammys birth place???

You can be a yellow dog Democrat   Just say so. it's okay

 

Did you not read about Trump’s charity? The man is unprincipled, and he holds office. I am indeed a Yellow Dog Democrat, whether it’s okay to say it or not.

[UT alum]

On 11/13/2019 at 6:16 AM, Hagar said:

And one last point.  I have to acknowledge the fact that UT Alum has not disputed the Godless claim.  How could he, the Dem Party embraced it, and him being just another sheep, follows along.  Of course, this was only the icing on the cake.  It was obvious when the Dems booed God at their 2012 Convention.  

The fact that they’re Godless, explains why they approve of abortion.  Why they embrace homosexuality, multiple genders, and perversion.  Why they want to make slaves of all Americans under the guise of being “caring”.   Saddest part, imo, is the folks who believe in God, but remain Democrat.  

You know, Hagar, your judgement on people as Godless comes mighty close to the kind of judgement I thought the Almighty reserves for himself only. You’re treading on spiritually thin ice there, bub.

[UT alum]

On 11/13/2019 at 6:04 AM, Hagar said:

Did I overlook a post, or did you get crickets on this?   🦗🦗🦗

Perhaps UT Alum needs to train his legal eye on the activities in the Dem controlled HOR.  There’s plenty of bad and unprincipled activities going on there.

Firing anyone who disagrees with you is unprincipled in my book. Public berating of anyone who disagrees with you is unprincipled. Labeling political opponents as traitors or enemies is unprincipled. Using a charity to funnel money into your campaign is unprincipled. Casting doubt and aspersions on public institutions is unprincipled for a Commander in Chief. 

[stevenash]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Here we go again. What about Ford? That was recalling stuff from 30 years ago, so while it may of been her recollection, it was too long ago to be reliable. That doesn’t make her a liar. As for what about OJ, all I can say is, he was acquitted, so what difference does that make? Lastly, as for what about Zelensky, was he under oath? I think not.

Then if it was too long ago to be reliable, what in the He__ were the hearings for?

[BS Wildcats]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

You know, Hagar, your judgement on people as Godless comes mighty close to the kind of judgement I thought the Almighty reserves for himself only. You’re treading on spiritually thin ice there, bub.

He pretty much nailed what they stand for.  He's not passing judgement,  just stating facts about the Demoncrats.

[Whoa]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Did you not read about Trump’s charity? The man is unprincipled, and he holds office. I am indeed a Yellow Dog Democrat, whether it’s okay to say it or not.

Clinton's charities???

Last reply to your post.  

[BS Wildcats]

8 minutes ago, Whoa said:

Clinton's charities???

Last reply to your post.  

No matter what wrong they did, the Clintons and obammy will get a free pass from the Libtard bunch.  Trump can't sleep right without these people trying to get him out of office.  They know they can't defeat him at the polls, so they resort to straw grasping.

 

[LumRaiderFan]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

You know, Hagar, your judgement on people as Godless comes mighty close to the kind of judgement I thought the Almighty reserves for himself only. You’re treading on spiritually thin ice there, bub.

Matthew 7:16-20 King James Version (KJV)

¹⁶ Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

¹⁷ Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

¹⁸ A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

¹⁹ Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

²⁰ Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

 

It is, without a doubt, God's place for final judgement on where someone spends eternity.

However, He never intended for us to be fools, bury our heads in the sand and not recognize evil behavior.

[Hagar]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

You know, Hagar, your judgement on people as Godless comes mighty close to the kind of judgement I thought the Almighty reserves for himself only. You’re treading on spiritually thin ice there, bub.

Though you probably don’t realize it, there’s more at stake in every election than employment, deficits, and pie in the Sky HC.  Our very religious freedom is in jeopardy.   Christianity is at stake, threatened under the guise of the First Amendment.  Anyone who’s studied History knows the FA, Seperation of Church and State, was designed to prevent the US becoming a theocracy, not to remove every religious symbol.  They not only mentioned God, but acknowledged Christ as God in the 1787 ratification clause, when they stated, “In the year of our Lord”.  The attacks on our Christian freedom continue from the Left.  Sure, I have a plank in my eye, but I’m not blind to the devious actions of those under the influence of Satan.

[UT alum]

6 hours ago, stevenash said:

Then if it was too long ago to be reliable, what in the He__ were the hearings for?

Political theater