Liberal Former Law Professor- Dems Acting Like KGB

[Hagar]

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Dershowitz is a shameless self promoter. I believe him about like I believe Giuliani. Trump used our tax dollars to shake down Ukraine for personal political gain. Where’s the KGB in that? Why is just investigating it a witch hunt? 

[UT alum]

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

[LumRaiderFan]

Good article...he's 100% correct.

When this witch hunt fails, they'll come up with another one.

The good thing is that as long as the dems are focused on hating on Trump, they're not passing any stupid policies that would hurt the American people.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Dershowitz is a shameless self promoter. I believe him about like I believe Giuliani. Trump used our tax dollars to shake down Ukraine for personal political gain. Where’s the KGB in that? Why is just investigating it a witch hunt? 

So if a former VP (while VP) actually did use taxpayer money to shake down a country to have someone fired so his dunce son wouldn't get investigated, that's not something that the President should look into?

Of course it is.  It's corruption at the highest level and should be investigated.

Come on, man...put that high powered degree to work...think!

[UT alum]

34 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So if a former VP (while VP) actually did use taxpayer money to shake down a country to have someone fired so his dunce son wouldn't get investigated, that's not something that the President should look into?

Of course it is.  It's corruption at the highest level and should be investigated.

Come on, man...put that high powered degree to work...think!

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

[BS Wildcats]

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

Heard an interview with Biden bragging about doing this.  Not sure that can be debunked.  It's all good because obummer played a role in getting the Ukranian prosecutor fired.  He and Biden must be like the Clintons, can't let nothing stick to those pieces of 💩

[Hagar]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

Excuse me, but one facet of the “investigation” was possible Ukraine interference in our 2016 election.  That’s a subject the Dems have been screaming about.  I guess it’s not important anymore.  😂😂😂.   And just a reminder, the most controversial outside interference was initiated by Hillary and the DNC via the infamous Steele Dossier, which was full of unsubstantiated outrageous accusations by Russians, paid for by H & DNC.

[LumRaiderFan]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

It has not been debunked and the President can use whomever he chooses to investigate or negotiate for him.

Post some links where it was debunked and also post links where the President can't use anyone but cabinet members for negotiation.

 

[Hagar]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

Constitutional scholars interpretation?   Hate to tell you this but Dershowitz is a Constitutional Scholar.  Guess it depends on what your definition of is, is.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[LumRaiderFan]

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

Excuse me, but one facet of the “investigation” was possible Ukraine interference in our 2016 election.  That’s a subject the Dems have been screaming about.  I guess it’s not important anymore.  😂😂😂.   And just a reminder, the most controversial outside interference was initiated by Hillary and the DNC via the infamous Steele Dossier, which was full of unsubstantiated outrageous accusations by Russians, paid for by H & DNC.

Dems seem to be only interested in corruption / collusion from Republicans.

Their problem is they're (Dems) are responsible for 99.99999 % of it.

 

[Law Man]

I believe The 2020 elections will be a shocker. This Country is sadly divided and hate is alive and well. We all should be praying and asking God to move in a mighty way. 

[BS Wildcats]

2 minutes ago, Law Man said:

I believe The 2020 elections will be a shocker. This Country is sadly divided and hate is alive and well. We all should be praying and asking God to move in a mighty way. 

The Dems boo God, so we can't count on them!!  

MAGA in 2020!!!!

Trump!!!!!

[UT alum]

15 hours ago, Hagar said:

Constitutional scholars interpretation?   Hate to tell you this but Dershowitz is a Constitutional Scholar.  Guess it depends on what your definition of is, is.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

[UT alum]

18 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Heard an interview with Biden bragging about doing this.  Not sure that can be debunked.  It's all good because obummer played a role in getting the Ukranian prosecutor fired.  He and Biden must be like the Clintons, can't let nothing stick to those pieces of 💩

Bragging about doing what?

[NetCat]

21 hours ago, UT alum said:

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

15 hours ago, Hagar said:

Constitutional scholars interpretation?   Hate to tell you this but Dershowitz is a Constitutional Scholar.  Guess it depends on what your definition of is, is.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

27 minutes ago, UT alum said:

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

So @Hagar is a constitutional scholar? 😂😂😂

[BS Wildcats]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Bragging about doing what?

Withholding money to Ukraine if they do not fire a prosecutor investigating the company Biden's son was working for.  He also claimed he had the backing of obammy in doing this.  

[Hagar]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

Let me make one thing clear, I’m not a Constitutional Scholar.  I was replying to your post where you ask me to research what a Constitutional Scholars definition of a “high crime”.   Dershowitz is one, and he compares the Dems actions to the KGB.   I have no idea what the definition is, but I do know the telephone call Trump made to the Ukraine President does not meet that criteria. Asking him to investigate - interference in the 2016 election (a big Dem talking point until someone wants to actually do it), and was Hunter Bidens job there a part of the corruption in the Ukraine.  The most laughable part is the allegation he was digging up dirty info on Biden.  Biden has as much of a chance of beating Trump as you have.  Trump will slaughter him in debates.