Jump to content

Liberal Former Law Professor- Dems Acting Like KGB


Hagar

Recommended Posts

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

Dershowitz is a shameless self promoter. I believe him about like I believe Giuliani. Trump used our tax dollars to shake down Ukraine for personal political gain. Where’s the KGB in that? Why is just investigating it a witch hunt? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hagar said:

This witch hunt, and this is an accurate descriptive term, has gone from ridiculous to scary.  For the Democrats to be compared to the KGB by a man with Dershowitz’s credentials, and a Liberal Democrat, should strike fear in the hearts of anyone who loves America, Conservative or Liberal.

This is the hidden content, please

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Dershowitz is a shameless self promoter. I believe him about like I believe Giuliani. Trump used our tax dollars to shake down Ukraine for personal political gain. Where’s the KGB in that? Why is just investigating it a witch hunt? 

So if a former VP (while VP) actually did use taxpayer money to shake down a country to have someone fired so his dunce son wouldn't get investigated, that's not something that the President should look into?

Of course it is.  It's corruption at the highest level and should be investigated.

Come on, man...put that high powered degree to work...think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So if a former VP (while VP) actually did use taxpayer money to shake down a country to have someone fired so his dunce son wouldn't get investigated, that's not something that the President should look into?

Of course it is.  It's corruption at the highest level and should be investigated.

Come on, man...put that high powered degree to work...think!

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

Heard an interview with Biden bragging about doing this.  Not sure that can be debunked.  It's all good because obummer played a role in getting the Ukranian prosecutor fired.  He and Biden must be like the Clintons, can't let nothing stick to those pieces of 💩

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

Excuse me, but one facet of the “investigation” was possible Ukraine interference in our 2016 election.  That’s a subject the Dems have been screaming about.  I guess it’s not important anymore.  😂😂😂.   And just a reminder, the most controversial outside interference was initiated by Hillary and the DNC via the infamous Steele Dossier, which was full of unsubstantiated outrageous accusations by Russians, paid for by H & DNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government. 

It has not been debunked and the President can use whomever he chooses to investigate or negotiate for him.

Post some links where it was debunked and also post links where the President can't use anyone but cabinet members for negotiation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

Constitutional scholars interpretation?   Hate to tell you this but Dershowitz is a Constitutional Scholar.  Guess it depends on what your definition of is, is.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

Excuse me, but one facet of the “investigation” was possible Ukraine interference in our 2016 election.  That’s a subject the Dems have been screaming about.  I guess it’s not important anymore.  😂😂😂.   And just a reminder, the most controversial outside interference was initiated by Hillary and the DNC via the infamous Steele Dossier, which was full of unsubstantiated outrageous accusations by Russians, paid for by H & DNC.

Dems seem to be only interested in corruption / collusion from Republicans.

Their problem is they're (Dems) are responsible for 99.99999 % of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Heard an interview with Biden bragging about doing this.  Not sure that can be debunked.  It's all good because obummer played a role in getting the Ukranian prosecutor fired.  He and Biden must be like the Clintons, can't let nothing stick to those pieces of 💩

Bragging about doing what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, UT alum said:

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

15 hours ago, Hagar said:

Constitutional scholars interpretation?   Hate to tell you this but Dershowitz is a Constitutional Scholar.  Guess it depends on what your definition of is, is.

This is the hidden content, please

27 minutes ago, UT alum said:

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

So @Hagar is a constitutional scholar? 😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

Let me make one thing clear, I’m not a Constitutional Scholar.  I was replying to your post where you ask me to research what a Constitutional Scholars definition of a “high crime”.   Dershowitz is one, and he compares the Dems actions to the KGB.   I have no idea what the definition is, but I do know the telephone call Trump made to the Ukraine President does not meet that criteria. Asking him to investigate - interference in the 2016 election (a big Dem talking point until someone wants to actually do it), and was Hunter Bidens job there a part of the corruption in the Ukraine.  The most laughable part is the allegation he was digging up dirty info on Biden.  Biden has as much of a chance of beating Trump as you have.  Trump will slaughter him in debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don’t know about any rivalry there because I don’t live there but although LP and DP play in different classifications they still have a lot in common.  I mean, both beat Barber’s Hill this year!
    • I’m super excited for this game.  PNG has the team and game plan that will slow TH down.  No way we can stop them the entire game, but I feel if we slow them down we can win similar to what we did last year to Lake Creek and SOC.  
    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...