West Orange-Stark 24 Bellville 14/FINAL

[WOSdrummer99]

I was extremely impressed by Bellville. Goal line stand, and 99 yard drive doesn't happen often again us. That's the best Bellville team I've seen. And they'll be better next year.

 @aTmfan06 thanks for keeping us up on your team. Good luck in whatever region you land next season. 

[Majestyk]

That is the problem. Have you bothered to check WO-S roster. It's coming....good luck.

[wo-s#1]

44 minutes ago, NetCat said:

He really get ejected? Who was it?  Means he has to sit the first half next week right? 

54....it’s gonna hurt without him

 

[NetCat]

1 minute ago, wo-s#1 said:

54....it’s gonna hurt without him

 

Ouch, yeah

[WO-S 89]

40 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

54....it’s gonna hurt without him

 

He’s playing next week 

[kicker 2.0]

41 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

54....it’s gonna hurt without him

 

He will not have to sit out.

[aTmfan06]

3 minutes ago, kicker 2.0 said:

He will not have to sit out.

Not for one half?

[aTmfan06]

51 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

I was extremely impressed by Bellville. Goal line stand, and 99 yard drive doesn't happen often again us. That's the best Bellville team I've seen. And they'll be better next year.

 @aTmfan06 thanks for keeping us up on your team. Good luck in whatever region you land next season. 

Thanks yeah we are losing 2 key players on defense. #12 and #9. But basically everyone else will be back. 

[One4All]

2 personal fouls on one player = out for 1st half of next game 

[NetCat]

9 minutes ago, kicker 2.0 said:

He will not have to sit out.

 

4 minutes ago, One4All said:

2 personal fouls on one player = out for 1st half of next game 

This is what I thought as well, did they change the rule? Or did he really not get ejected? 

[aTmfan06]

11 minutes ago, NetCat said:

 

This is what I thought as well, did they change the rule? Or did he really not get ejected? 

He was disqualified from the game. I always thought the same.

[MrUmp1]

It was one personal foul at the end, the other was unsportsmanlike like conduct. Not sure about the whole thing except we were told in press box before game was over he was not ejected, official must have changed the ruling on ejection. Have to see what happens.

[One4All]

39 minutes ago, MrUmp1 said:

It was one personal foul at the end, the other was unsportsmanlike like conduct. Not sure about the whole thing except we were told in press box before game was over he was not ejected, official must have changed the ruling on ejection. Have to see what happens.

I believe  unsportsmanlike conduct = a personal foul

[WOSgrad]

45.9-2-2-e-PENALTY—Disqualification for the remainder of the game and the team’s next game [S27 and S47]. Administer as a deadball foul; penalty enforced at the succeeding spot, and Team B fouls do not require a first down. Team timeout. VIOLATION—Rules 3-3-6 and 3-4-2-b [S23, S3 or S21]. If the disqualification occurs during the last game of a season, players with eligibility remaining will serve the next-game disqualification during the first game of the next season for which they are eligible.

11EXCEPTION: 9-2-2-e-PENALTY. For UIL games, disqualification is for remainder of the current game and the first half of the next game. NOTE: Disqualification for targeting is for the remainder of the current game only. Local school districts and/or UIL District Committees may apply additional disciplinary action. 46.9-2-6-a, b& c. Disqualified Players a. Anycoach, player, or identified squad member in uniform who commits two unsportsmanlike conduct fouls in the same game shall be disqualified.

[WOSgrad]

According to the KOGT.com wrap up article, a WO-S player was ejected.

[wo-s#1]

Grad he never left the field though....if you’re ejected you have to hit the showers right?

[wo-s#1]

He walked towards the locker room then came back...idk but it looked like someone said earlier in the thread,maybe ref changed his mind?

[aTmfan06]

32 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

He walked towards the locker room then came back...idk but it looked like someone said earlier in the thread,maybe ref changed his mind?

I hope that he gets to play. Probably just some dumb in the heat of the moment thing anyways 

[wo-s#1]

Probably so,he’s a good kid...

[NetCat]

47 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Grad he never left the field though....if you’re ejected you have to hit the showers right?

Yes, if you are ejected you have to leave the field. Can't even stand on the sidelines

[wo-s#1]

I thought so... I don’t think he was ejected 

[CardinalBacker]

Well... we can count on Aggies and the Silsbee coaching staff to see this matter through to a resolution. 

[Lightning/Eagle]

22 minutes ago, NetCat said:

Yes, if you are ejected you have to leave the field. Can't even stand on the sidelines

I have seen ejected players stay on the sideline this year. I did see a trainer take helmets away. I’m not 100% positive but I thought it was two unsportsmanlike penalties that caused ejection. In other words if you get two face mask penalties that is not cause for ejection.

[BMTSoulja1]

No matter how you get ejected, you're supposed to hit the locker room.

[WOSgrad]

46 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

No matter how you get ejected, you're supposed to hit the locker room.

To my surprise, UIL rules do not require an ejected player to leave the field.  It is one of the few differences between UIL and NCAA rules.