Jump to content

1A – 5A FOOTBALL DIVISION I AND DIVISION II NUMBERS


HasBeen36

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

May I ask why you think this?

LCM and Lumberton both went 2 rounds deep, Carthage is going down, Reg 3 Div 1 is kinda open in my eyes. Vidor hung tough in 5A, they are going to a lot less competitive district, the writing is on the wall is for them to be very competitive and excel greatly at the 4A level. But that’s my honest opinion, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Alpha Wolf said:

So our local 5A-D1 should consist of...

Baytown Sterling

Beaumont United

Goose Creek Memorial

Port Arthur Memorial

and probably 4 more teams.

What about:

New Caney, Porter, Caney Creek, Cleveland, Magnolia, Magnolia West, Lufkin, United, PAM.

Would be a nine team district with quite a bit of travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Lightning/Eagle said:

What about:

New Caney, Porter, Caney Creek, Cleveland, Magnolia, Magnolia West, Lufkin, United, PAM.

Would be a nine team district with quite a bit of travel.

So where are you going to put the 2, possibly 3 Baytown schools (if Lee opts up)?  I really don't care what teams are in the district, just as long as it's not more than 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BADSANTA said:

All will take another loss to WOS, Jasper, and Silsbee 😂

Beats the heck out of getting beat by way bigger, but yet sorry for their size schools.
 

I’d much rather match up with district rivals like you guys, HJ, OF, HF, WOS, etc.... than to square up with Navasota, Cleveland, Huffman, Splendora, or Livingston. Hopefully we can still get in with LiCk’eM in non district.  
 

I heard that Jasper is opting up to avoid being placed in district with Silsbee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Beats the heck out of getting beat by way bigger, but yet sorry for their size schools.
 

I’d much rather match up with district rivals like you guys, HJ, OF, HF, WOS, etc.... than to square up with Navasota, Cleveland, Huffman, Splendora, or Livingston. Hopefully we can still get in with LiCk’eM in non district.  
 

I heard that Jasper is opting up to avoid being placed in district with Silsbee

👀👀👀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Beats the heck out of getting beat by way bigger, but yet sorry for their size schools.
 

I’d much rather match up with district rivals like you guys, HJ, OF, HF, WOS, etc.... than to square up with Navasota, Cleveland, Huffman, Splendora, or Livingston. Hopefully we can still get in with LiCk’eM in non district.  
 

I heard that Jasper is opting up to avoid being placed in district with Silsbee. 

I agree. I think it's better to have BC in the district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Alpha Wolf said:

So where are you going to put the 2, possibly 3 Baytown schools (if Lee opts up)?  I really don't care what teams are in the district, just as long as it's not more than 8.

Milby, Waltrip, and Wisdom all have 5A 1 numbers. I’m wondering about Waller though. They are west along with Paetow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

A college lol

Pretty much.

Back in 80's I had kinfolk who graduated from Plano High. They only had the one school back then. The senior class was over 1300 so they had graduation on two different nights. A thru M on one night, N thru Z on next night. Crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

Both Carthage and Celina are dropping down to D2.

Liberty Hill is moving up to 5A. I guess 4AD1 will belong to La Vega now.

Allen right at 7,000 kids is crazy. What does a high school that size even look like.

I looked at some pics and videos of the school.  Look, they're right.  Looks like a small college.  Many Baseball fields (like 8), like 3 football stadiums, state of the art main stadium, state of the art school,  indoor practice facilities, ect.  Crazy to say it's a high school...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Pretty much.

Back in 80's I had kinfolk who graduated from Plano High. They only had the one school back then. The senior class was over 1300 so they had graduation on two different nights. A thru M on one night, N thru Z on next night. Crazy!

That would be  a nightmare.. and I thought Lumberton’s took forever lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MustangNation#1 said:

So it's might look like this for 4a d2 region 3

West Orange Stark

Bridge City 

Jasper

HJ

Hamshire fanntt

Silsbee

Orangefield

No way all in one district. 92 teams in 4A D2/ 16 districts makes it an average of 5.75 teams per district. Mostly 5 team districts with a few 6 team districts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...