Jump to content

Silsbee Vs Wimberley


Who That

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, JimThorpe said:

Wimbo deserves to be the favorite because they trounced a team with better rushing stats than Silsbee.  Navarro was averaging 411 ypg rusing.  They had two more or less 1000 yard rushers and a 2000 yard rusher in a fairly strong district.  Wimbo handled them with apparent ease last week.  Why shouldn't they be able to do pretty much the same thing against Silsbee?

And we don't even know what will happen with Wimbo's passing.  Silsbee hasn't faced an air attack like Wimbo's all year, or last year either for that matter.  You've got to figure they will probably get around 400 yards of total offense.

So on paper Wimbo has to get the nod.  A 3pt spread is more than fair.  

But .  The game before Navarro against Rockport game is very interesting.  Rockport seems to be all run.  Team stats show 32 passing yards per game and rushing ypg similar to Silsbee.  And they played Wimbo even all the way down the line.  Looks like an extra point in the 4th quarter was the difference. 

 

 

Yes we have, and we learned from it and moved personal around. I don't think Wimbo has a passing attack like Springhill did against us. So, lets see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee wins this game. It's probably going to be a barn burner tho. The Tigers schedule have them tested and ready. They will not get out-athleted. When WO-S played Wimberly in '17 they had a QB who was like 7'6" and threw for 4 or 5 miles, don't think he's still there but it won't matter. I know they don't have an alien on their roster like Cuero did. Good luck Tigers, do us proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Who That said:

I'm about to post your real name .. So everyone can look you up.. And I promise I can buy any room and buy everything you own young man. 

Post it then. If you are displeased with this “trolling”. Do a bit better next season regarding your online discussion of others. They might be reading along, and may have a bit of concise dialogue to add. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WimberleyD1 said:

Post it then. If you are displeased with this “trolling”. Do a bit better next season regarding your online discussion of others. They might be reading along, and may have a bit of concise dialogue to add. 

Find one thing on hear where I said anything bad about Wimberley until you got on here.  I never even gave a prediction on this game. We new yall would be good are yall wouldn't be their. And if we would of won I promise you you wouldn't see us on a Wimberley site talking mess to yalls fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But like I said if this make s you feel good go ahead ... And like I said maybe we can meet up in a nice Basketball match this year yall have alot of height shouldn't be a problem to make a deep run in the playoffs... But I" promise you you will get that A$$ beat all the way back to Wimberley ‼

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Who That said:

Find one thing on hear where I said anything bad about Wimberley until you got on here.  I never even gave a prediction on this game. We new yall would be good are yall wouldn't be their. And if we would of won I promise you you wouldn't see us on a Wimberley site talking mess to yalls fans. 

? I suggest you do the same and look back through my comments. I have typed absolute nothing vulgar or offensive to anyone. I have not eluded to any of your players being homosexual or that our community is “homosexual”. I’m going to guess that you, personally, had no part. However, that isn’t the reality of this weeks discussion. I know Thus  because I have ready this. I’m sure you are a very respectful person. I’m sure most are. However, a bit of “trolling” as it’s been called is warranted, in my opinion. Ample amounts of giving on this thread, not so great at taking. 
In the end, I don’t want to be rude. You guys have a great team and program. The point of this is to point out that perhaps you can give a bit of respect as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WimberleyD1 said:

? I suggest you do the same and look back through my comments. I have typed absolute nothing vulgar or offensive to anyone. I have not eluded to any of your players being homosexual or that our community is “homosexual”. I’m going to guess that you, personally, had no part. However, that isn’t the reality of this weeks discussion. I know Thus  because I have ready this. I’m sure you are a very respectful person. I’m sure most are. However, a bit of “trolling” as it’s been called is warranted, in my opinion. Ample amounts of giving on this thread, not so great at taking. 
In the end, I don’t want to be rude. You guys have a great team and program. The point of this is to point out that perhaps you can give a bit of respect as well. 

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WimberleyD1 said:

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

It was" And man did you see it.. It was like he got hit with a truck. 😂🤣 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WimberleyD1 said:

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

How is #9? I was right there at the 50 yard line. He took a massive hit man. He stumbled when he got up as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...