Reagan Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 Well -- there you have it. pelosi said it's NOT about "proof" it's about ALLEGATIONS!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: I do believe snagging is against the law. If you couldn’t catch fish that way, it wouldn’t be illegal. Have you ever been fishing??? Doesn’t matter .....common sense would help you recognize the analogy. then again your smart enough to see it but .... Godzilla 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Don’t take but one bad one to spoil the barrel, Bucket. You are definitely right and you should know coming from the leaders you support Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said: Have you ever been fishing??? Doesn’t matter .....common sense would help you recognize the analogy. then again your smart enough to see it but .... Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBack Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, UT alum said: Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish. Not with the same success that baited ones do, c'mon man. The time you spent reading into that was far too long and now I revoke your devils advocate position, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, OverTheBack said: Not with the same success that baited ones do, c'mon man. The time you spent reading into that was far too long and now I revoke your devils advocate position, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. He will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBack Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, UT alum said: He will. Just a quote from a movie, don't take it personally and stop reading so much. Rest your brain/eyes lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, OverTheBack said: Just a quote from a movie, don't take it personally and stop reading so much. Rest your brain/eyes lol Didn’t see that one, I guess. The way the Repusslicans dissect every jot and tittle that comes from a Democrat’s mouth, I take each word at its value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 29 minutes ago, UT alum said: Yes, I fish. I’m familiar with TPWD regs, and your analogy was flawed in my estimation. Bare hooks do catch fish. My oh my! go back and read what I said and what I didn’t say. In bold and no it wasn’t flawed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 9 minutes ago, UT alum said: Didn’t see that one, I guess. The way the Repusslicans dissect every jot and tittle that comes from a Democrat’s mouth, I take each word at its value. Apparently You don’t cause I never said you don’t catch fish. NetCat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverTheBack Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 10 minutes ago, UT alum said: Didn’t see that one, I guess. The way the Repusslicans dissect every jot and tittle that comes from a Democrat’s mouth, I take each word at its value. I take jot and tittles very seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, OverTheBack said: I take jot and tittles very seriously. Maybe you read too much. OverTheBack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NetCat Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 5 hours ago, UT alum said: I believe if he’s convicted in the Senate he will be immediately removed from office and barred from serving in any federal office in the future. I think they have to "formally vote" on it after conviction. But yes, that is what will happen if he is convicted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NetCat Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 5 hours ago, UT alum said: I believe if he’s convicted in the Senate he will be immediately removed from office and barred from serving in any federal office in the future. I think he could still hold office, just not anything big. Not sure on that though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 7 hours ago, UT alum said: Oh, yeah, like that plunge in 2007? Which party had the White House? My accounts were halved, came back under President Obama, and have gained under “little hands” as the economy President Obama saved continued its expansion. Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 9 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs. Yes, the weakest post recession recovery in 50 years. The only President to NEVER have a single year out of 8 that provided a 2% GDP. So Obama "saved" the economy?. Go ahead and name the recessions ( regardless of political party) from which we did not recover. We were going to recover regardless of who was in office because this is a resilient country/economy. The bounce back from 2008 could have/should have been much more robust but the party that had the White House implemented policies and attitudes that prevented same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 22 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs. Admitting that the first BLACK president was an utter failure is difficult for some to admit. I won’t call any names, but his initials are UT Alum. BS Wildcats 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 hour ago, baddog said: Admitting that the first BLACK president was an utter failure is difficult for some to admit. I won’t call any names, but his initials are UT Alum. BINGO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 3 hours ago, NetCat said: I think they have to "formally vote" on it after conviction. But yes, that is what will happen if he is convicted. Thx for the info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said: Lmfao!! Giving credit to Mr. Shovel Ready jobs. Glad you got a good laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 You know, these dims crap all over OUR constitution on a regular basis, especially during this impeachment process, but when it seems to serve them, they reach in their hip pocket and try to quote it, or at least recognize it. It also bothers me when they talk about our founding fathers, as if they would make even a pimple on any of their rear ends. Those visionaries were pure geniuses. I wonder if any of our congressmen today are aware of this..... The founding fathers only paid senators and congressmen a “per diem” amount while in session. They knew that if congress was paid a salary that they could always vote to increase, then they would no longer be “Of the people” but “Above the people”. They wanted those in Congress to be subject to the same economic and financial conditions as the rest of the nation based upon the laws they passed.......genius NetCat and WOSdrummer99 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Glad you got a good laugh. I seem to get a lot of those from you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 13 hours ago, UT alum said: “I see”, said the blind man. “You lie”, said the dumb man. “Be quiet!”, said the deaf man. Blind, dumb and deaf....typical Democrat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 Just read where the pens that Pelosi had made to sign the Articles of Impeachment cost $15,0000. Trump signed a $2B trade deal with a $1.99 Sharpie. That's the difference between a businessman and a worthless politician. Ty Cobb 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 On 1/17/2020 at 8:03 AM, UT alum said: If trump declares executive privilege, SCOTUS might get to weigh in. They have already weighed in with the case US v Nixon (1974) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.