baddog Posted December 22, 2019 Report Posted December 22, 2019 Just some facts to chew on.... Here is an interesting fact for my American friends: During the 3-1/2 years of World War 2 that started with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and ended with the Surrender of Germany and Japan in 1945, "The People of the U.S.A." produced the following:22 aircraft carriers,8 battleships,48 cruisers,349 destroyers,420 destroyer escorts,203 submarines,34 million tons of merchant ships,100,000 fighter aircraft,98,000 bombers,24,000 transport aircraft,58,000 training aircraft,93,000 tanks,257,000 artillery pieces,105,000 mortars,3,000,000 machine guns, and2,500,000 military trucks.We put 16.1 million men in uniform in the various armed services, invaded Africa, invaded Sicily and Italy, won the battle for the Atlantic, planned and executed D-Day, marched across the Pacific and Europe, developed the atomic bomb, and ultimately conquered Japan and Germany.It's worth noting, that during the almost exact amount of time, the Obama Administration couldn't even build a web site that worked. Reagan and BS Wildcats 1 1 Quote
UT alum Posted December 30, 2019 Report Posted December 30, 2019 On 12/22/2019 at 10:54 AM, baddog said: Just some facts to chew on.... Here is an interesting fact for my American friends: During the 3-1/2 years of World War 2 that started with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and ended with the Surrender of Germany and Japan in 1945, "The People of the U.S.A." produced the following:22 aircraft carriers,8 battleships,48 cruisers,349 destroyers,420 destroyer escorts,203 submarines,34 million tons of merchant ships,100,000 fighter aircraft,98,000 bombers,24,000 transport aircraft,58,000 training aircraft,93,000 tanks,257,000 artillery pieces,105,000 mortars,3,000,000 machine guns, and2,500,000 military trucks.We put 16.1 million men in uniform in the various armed services, invaded Africa, invaded Sicily and Italy, won the battle for the Atlantic, planned and executed D-Day, marched across the Pacific and Europe, developed the atomic bomb, and ultimately conquered Japan and Germany.It's worth noting, that during the almost exact amount of time, the Obama Administration couldn't even build a web site that worked. I just read this. That’s about the most bulls**t comparison I’ve yet seen. From ‘41 - ‘45 our country was almost 100% united. President Obama’s term began with the senate majority leader, Moscow Mitch McConnel announcing his number one priority in his position was, what? His constituents? No. It was to make Obama a one term president. Good things happen when the United States are united. trump is what happens when we’re not. What’s gonna be his contribution? 150 yards of fence? Quote
baddog Posted December 30, 2019 Author Report Posted December 30, 2019 I think it was exaggerated facts to drop a bomb Obama (comical). However, Obama divided the races with his cop and professor, you know, sharing a beer. Trump is tearing up the deep state, which needs to be done. Dimwits have shown to be the divisive ones. Good try. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted December 30, 2019 Report Posted December 30, 2019 1 hour ago, UT alum said: I just read this. That’s about the most bulls**t comparison I’ve yet seen. From ‘41 - ‘45 our country was almost 100% united. President Obama’s term began with the senate majority leader, Moscow Mitch McConnel announcing his number one priority in his position was, what? His constituents? No. It was to make Obama a one term president. Good things happen when the United States are united. trump is what happens when we’re not. What’s gonna be his contribution? 150 yards of fence? That's the goal of either party when their guy isn't the President. I know you want your little Trump hating statements to be true so bad...but they're not. Trump (or any other President) will never be able to unite the socialist wing of your party with normal Americans...they're gone. baddog 1 Quote
stevenash Posted December 30, 2019 Report Posted December 30, 2019 2 hours ago, UT alum said: I just read this. That’s about the most bulls**t comparison I’ve yet seen. From ‘41 - ‘45 our country was almost 100% united. President Obama’s term began with the senate majority leader, Moscow Mitch McConnel announcing his number one priority in his position was, what? His constituents? No. It was to make Obama a one term president. Good things happen when the United States are united. trump is what happens when we’re not. What’s gonna be his contribution? 150 yards of fence? And Obama's " contribution" was? Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 30, 2019 Report Posted December 30, 2019 8 hours ago, stevenash said: And Obama's " contribution" was? Division Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 11 hours ago, stevenash said: And Obama's " contribution" was? Affordable health care...lol. Quote
UT alum Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 23 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: That's the goal of either party when their guy isn't the President. I know you want your little Trump hating statements to be true so bad...but they're not. Trump (or any other President) will never be able to unite the socialist wing of your party with normal Americans...they're gone. No, it is not the goal of either party’s leadership. Moscow Mitch was the first, at least in the modern era, to openly state such a goal. I don’t hate trump. I think he is grossly under qualified for the position he holds, especially where foreign relations are concerned, making the leader of the free world a national security risk. Sad. Law Man 1 Quote
UT alum Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 On 12/30/2019 at 8:09 AM, baddog said: I think it was exaggerated facts to drop a bomb Obama (comical). However, Obama divided the races with his cop and professor, you know, sharing a beer. Trump is tearing up the deep state, which needs to be done. Dimwits have shown to be the divisive ones. Good try. The races have been divided since 1787. C’mon man, at least acknowledge our country’s history. Boyz N Da Hood 1 Quote
stevenash Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 26 minutes ago, UT alum said: The races have been divided since 1787. C’mon man, at least acknowledge our country’s history. Since 1787? Really? Sounds like the proposition that division is the fault of a certain political party is a an absolute and overt joke but so many ( including you) seem to accept said proposition. Why is that? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 47 minutes ago, UT alum said: No, it is not the goal of either party’s leadership. Moscow Mitch was the first, at least in the modern era, to openly state such a goal. I don’t hate trump. I think he is grossly under qualified for the position he holds, especially where foreign relations are concerned, making the leader of the free world a national security risk. Sad. You don’t know what you’re talking about. The goal is to ALWAYS try to remove the opposition party President ASAP. As far as Trump being qualified, he’s about to sign phase one of a huge trade deal with China, something no other President has been able to accomplish. We don’t get punked by other countries like we did under your hero, including Russia. I know you like to make the claim but the evidence shows different. What is sad is that many lefties just can’t realize they are better off than they were three years ago. Quote
baddog Posted January 2, 2020 Author Report Posted January 2, 2020 Looks as if this thread may hang around awhile. More ammo coming.... Iraqi official spotted outside embassy attack visited Obama White House in 2011 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
UT alum Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 On 12/31/2019 at 8:48 AM, stevenash said: Since 1787? Really? Sounds like the proposition that division is the fault of a certain political party is a an absolute and overt joke but so many ( including you) seem to accept said proposition. Why is that? It’s the fault of a nation, not a party. Good grief. I don’t see all issues as “us” vs. “them”. Quote
UT alum Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 On 12/31/2019 at 9:11 AM, LumRaiderFan said: You don’t know what you’re talking about. The goal is to ALWAYS try to remove the opposition party President ASAP. As far as Trump being qualified, he’s about to sign phase one of a huge trade deal with China, something no other President has been able to accomplish. We don’t get punked by other countries like we did under your hero, including Russia. I know you like to make the claim but the evidence shows different. What is sad is that many lefties just can’t realize they are better off than they were three years ago. I do know what I’m talking about, we just don’t agree. Hide and watch on the China deal. Xi’s gonna play him. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 34 minutes ago, UT alum said: I do know what I’m talking about, we just don’t agree. Hide and watch on the China deal. Xi’s gonna play him. Which I'm sure would please you, sadly. Please explain in detail, how you know this and the details of how Trump will be played. Don't skip anything, lay it all out for us. Quote
stevenash Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 Every single time a deal is made between two parties, each believes he/she got the best of the deal or it would not have been made. The financial markets ( whose collective wisdom is greater than that of anyone or anything else) are obviously not interpreting the china/us negotiations as having negative implications. Quote
UT alum Posted January 7, 2020 Report Posted January 7, 2020 On 1/3/2020 at 9:06 AM, LumRaiderFan said: Which I'm sure would please you, sadly. Please explain in detail, how you know this and the details of how Trump will be played. Don't skip anything, lay it all out for us. Trump is incompetent. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted January 7, 2020 Report Posted January 7, 2020 Looking at the economy and putting America first, Trump is more than competent. Now if we look at obama's economy and putting America first, his is a prime example of incompetency. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 7, 2020 Report Posted January 7, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Trump is incompetent. lol...great response. You should teach a debate class. Hagar 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 7, 2020 Report Posted January 7, 2020 47 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Looking at the economy and putting America first, Trump is more than competent. Now if we look at obama's economy and putting America first, his is a prime example of incompetency. BSW, no need to apply rational logic...doesn't sink in. Quote
stevenash Posted January 9, 2020 Report Posted January 9, 2020 On 1/7/2020 at 11:20 AM, UT alum said: Trump is incompetent. yea, right. You have special knowledge and insight regarding Trump that nobody else has. Quote
5GallonBucket Posted January 9, 2020 Report Posted January 9, 2020 On 12/30/2019 at 8:43 PM, LumRaiderFan said: Affordable health care...lol. My pocket book is still be affected.......negatively.....and not just a lil. what a joke Quote
Reagan Posted January 10, 2020 Report Posted January 10, 2020 On 1/7/2020 at 11:20 AM, UT alum said: Trump is incompetent. Explain! Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted January 10, 2020 Report Posted January 10, 2020 On 1/9/2020 at 7:29 AM, 5GallonBucket said: My pocket book is still be affected.......negatively.....and not just a lil. what a joke Pretty much says it. Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/7/2020 at 12:28 PM, LumRaiderFan said: lol...great response. You should teach a debate class. Debate appears to be a dead language. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.