UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/8/2020 at 7:59 PM, stevenash said: yea, right. You have special knowledge and insight regarding Trump that nobody else has. The evidence is prima facie. No special knowledge required. Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/10/2020 at 8:07 AM, Reagan said: Explain! The rate at which he lies is all the evidence I need. Quote
baddog Posted January 14, 2020 Author Report Posted January 14, 2020 59 minutes ago, UT alum said: The rate at which he lies is all the evidence I need. You lie all the time, expeditiously Quote
BS Wildcats Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: The rate at which he lies is all the evidence I need. Who, obama? Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 7 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Who, obama? No comparison. trump is the greatest at everything, right? I mean, hell, if he hadn’t been president the cancer death growth rate would never have fallen. Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 28 minutes ago, baddog said: You lie all the time, expeditiously I’m not sure I follow the use of that adverb, but sounds like you’re calling me some kind of liar. Quote
baddog Posted January 14, 2020 Author Report Posted January 14, 2020 1 minute ago, UT alum said: I’m not sure I follow the use of that adverb, but sounds like you’re calling me some kind of liar. Do I need a baseball bat? I said it, therefore it is true. That is all the conviction a dim and their followers need. Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 1 minute ago, baddog said: Do I need a baseball bat? I said it, therefore it is true. That is all the conviction a dim and their followers need. But how did you come up with “expeditiously”? Quote
baddog Posted January 14, 2020 Author Report Posted January 14, 2020 1 minute ago, UT alum said: But how did you come up with “expeditiously”? All the time and at an accelerated rate. It must be true, I said it. Quote
Whoa Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 On 12/31/2019 at 8:17 AM, UT alum said: The races have been divided since 1787. C’mon man, at least acknowledge our country’s history. You are correct. Way more minorities on welfare. Easier to get a job as a minority - EEOC mandates and preference given Easier to get a Government contract if you are minority owned or female owned The most discriminated group are middle aged white men - Those are facts Quote
BS Wildcats Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 27 minutes ago, Whoa said: You are correct. Way more minorities on welfare. Easier to get a job as a minority - EEOC mandates and preference given Easier to get a Government contract if you are minority owned or female owned The most discriminated group are middle aged white men - Those are facts Uh-oh, throwing out facts is something dims don't like. Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 4 hours ago, baddog said: All the time and at an accelerated rate. It must be true, I said it. Might want to check your dictionary Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Whoa said: You are correct. Way more minorities on welfare. Easier to get a job as a minority - EEOC mandates and preference given Easier to get a Government contract if you are minority owned or female owned The most discriminated group are middle aged white men - Those are facts Welfare - by percentage maybe but not by head count Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Whoa said: You are correct. Way more minorities on welfare. Easier to get a job as a minority - EEOC mandates and preference given Easier to get a Government contract if you are minority owned or female owned The most discriminated group are middle aged white men - Those are facts Quote
UT alum Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 If there wasn’t a history of hiring discrimination in our country, EEOC would not be needed. if there wasn’t a long history of minority business discrimination not only in contract awards, but bank lending as well, that law would not be necessary. Finally, I’m in that last group, and boy, did we have a hell of a run. History indeed pays back. Quote
stevenash Posted January 14, 2020 Report Posted January 14, 2020 3 hours ago, BS Wildcats said: Uh-oh, throwing out facts is something dims don't like. There are plenty of laws on the books that are not necessary. Take a look at the Community ReInvestment Act ( largely responsible for the sub prime mortgage crisis of 2008) . It had huge unintended consequences. Same happens when they pass laws such as taxing soft drinks. Some cities woke up and found unemployment up due to people being laid off from soft drink companies and related businesses and total revenues actually less than when soft drinks weren't being extra heavily taxed. Several states are teetering on the brink of insolvency and one need not investigate too far to find excessive taxes and excessive regulations as the culprits. Quote
baddog Posted January 15, 2020 Author Report Posted January 15, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 12:09 PM, UT alum said: Might want to check your dictionary Good word, bad modifier in this case. You still lie all the time. Quote
Whoa Posted January 15, 2020 Report Posted January 15, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 12:29 PM, UT alum said: If there wasn’t a history of hiring discrimination in our country, EEOC would not be needed. if there wasn’t a long history of minority business discrimination not only in contract awards, but bank lending as well, that law would not be necessary. Finally, I’m in that last group, and boy, did we have a hell of a run. History indeed pays back. We did. I'm 62 and on my way out. My son is an engineer - not much competition except for females in EE or CE. ME and Arch. etc... mostly white males. Quote
Hagar Posted January 21, 2020 Report Posted January 21, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 6:18 AM, UT alum said: Debate appears to be a dead language. If you’re on the wrong side of a debate, and have zero chance of winning, yes, debate is a dead language. Attempting to support Socialism to people that love freedom, is like making an assertion that there is human life on Mercury. You can rattle on, but it just ain’t so. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.