WOS87 Posted July 28, 2007 Report Posted July 28, 2007 Just making anyone who's interested aware that I'm adding in All-Time District Performance charts to the team histories as I am completing them.... I only have 3 completed but here they are. I have gotten requests to show how teams fared in district standings in my old original team history posts as there is no way to tell just looking at one team's schedule alone so this is attempting to provide information the regular game-by-game posts can't.They've got a lot of info packed in to a small area so I hope it's not too cluttered. Here's an overview of what everything means.Years that are in BLUE are years in which the team in question won an outright district title. This means that the team had the best win-loss record in district that year and that no other team tied them with the same record. Thus, if a team is shown as having won an outright district title with a 7-1-0 record. That means every other team in the district must have lost at least 2 games or more.Years that are in RED are years in which the team shared a district title. What counts as shared is any teams with the exact same win-loss record. (e.g. UIL policy is that if two teams finish atop the standings with equal 5-1-0 records, then they share the title no matter if one did beat the other in a head-to-head matchup)Rank is the seeding order in the district to determine who qualifies for the playoffs and which berth in the playoff bracket teams will fill. There are no ties as there has to be some sort of tiebreak method in order to determine who fills the district champ slot and the district runnerup slot in the Division 2 playoff brackets. If two teams have the same record, ties are broken by looking at who won the head-to-head matchup. 3-way ties are broken by looking at point differentials in only the games between the teams in question. At the top, the numbers next to 1st, 2nd and 3rd are the number of seasons finishing ranked as one of the top 3 seeds in the district. The Avg rank number at the top is the average seeding that team has finished in district over it's entire history.Size is just the number of teams aligned to each district in each year. Up at the top there's a number showing the average size of the district that team has been in over the years. In the +/- column, this is the average margin of victory (or loss) just in district games. It's a general indicator of how dominant a particular team was compared to the rest of the district in any particular year. if you add the +/- numbers of all the teams in one district together in a season they should equal 0. * - WOS went 4-1-0 on-the-field in 1992 but had to forfeit all 4 wins
Guest Ozen Posted July 28, 2007 Report Posted July 28, 2007 So we have a better winning percentage than Central?
WOS87 Posted July 28, 2007 Author Report Posted July 28, 2007 So we have a better winning percentage than Central?Most definitely
BMTSoulja1 Posted July 28, 2007 Report Posted July 28, 2007 Over half our games were against 5a competition. and with 10 extra years on yall. How would Ozen fare in the same sense?
WOS87 Posted July 28, 2007 Author Report Posted July 28, 2007 Here's West Brook... I had forgotten how bad '99 and '00 were for them.
BigWolf10 Posted July 29, 2007 Report Posted July 29, 2007 Over half our games were against 5a competition. and with 10 extra years on yall. How would Ozen fare in the same sense?yOU ARE RIGHT CENTRAL HAS BEEN IN MORE BATTLES THAN OZEN. TEST OF TIME, TEST OF TIME
WOS87 Posted August 5, 2007 Author Report Posted August 5, 2007 And here is Bridge City.... as you can imagine, the older a school is, the more difficult it is to completely fill out these tables because not only do you have to know how the team in question did each and every year, you have to know how each district opponent in each district did each and every year as well....Their one shared title was with West Orange in 1965. Both teams were 5-0-0 in district heading in to the final game of the season. It ended in a 20-20 tie and Bridge City advanced to the playoffs due to having more penetrations 7-3. That must have been a heck of a game with all that was on the line. BC advanced all the way to the state finals that year and due to only one team per district making the playoffs West Orange stayed home with a 5-0-1 district record.
WOS87 Posted September 11, 2007 Author Report Posted September 11, 2007 I did Nederland all the way back to their first District Title in 1937. Prior to that, I'm not 100% on the district numbers and the district opponents so I stopped there.One amazing thing I noticed about Nederland after doing this is that they have only gone winless in district 1 time in 70 years. I would imagine that not many programs around could claim that.
82 5A State Champs Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 Here's West Brook... I had forgotten how bad '99 and '00 were for them. 9 District Titles....and 1 State Championship! Great stuff WOS87! Thank God those bad years seem to be behind us!
KFDM COOP Posted October 9, 2007 Report Posted October 9, 2007 Thanks 87. Has the State All Time Winning Percentage changed or does WOS still hold it?
WOS87 Posted October 10, 2007 Author Report Posted October 10, 2007 Thanks 87. Has the State All Time Winning Percentage changed or does WOS still hold it?Nope... WO-S still has it....Highest All-Time Winning Percentages Statewide among the 1018 active 11-man UIL programs(includes all games played through October 10th, 2007)1. 78.65% - West Orange-Stark 273-73-32. 78.12% - El Paso Chapin 50-14-03. 77.80% - Odessa Permian 446-123-124. 76.94% - Houston Yates 361-104-125. 75.61% - Southlake Carroll 402-127-86. 75.28% - Austin Westlake 336-108-77. 74.57% - Dallas Carter 343-114-98. 73.56% - Highland Park 689-239-279. 73.43% - El Paso Franklin 105-38-010. 72.32% - Pflugerville Connally 81-31-011. 72.15% - Arlington Lamar 295-112-612. 70.16% - Converse Judson 383-160-1013. 69.96% - Austin Reagan 331-139-1114. 69.57% - La Marque 498-213-1715. 69.35% - Mansfield Summit 43-19-016. 69.24% - San Antonio Clark 226-99-517. 69.04% - Amarillo 696-306-2218. 68.65% - Plano 687-301-4719. 68.36% - Euless Trinity 306-140-620. 68.18% - Lewisville Hebron 60-28-021. 68.00% - Celina 484-223-1822. 67.96% - Temple 672-303-5223. 67.86% - Waco (Consolidated) 170-80-224. 67.74% - Hondo 626-290-3125. 67.58% - Ranger 577-268-34
WOS87 Posted October 21, 2007 Author Report Posted October 21, 2007 I finally got around to PN-G... 21 District titles....trying for #22 this season. Finished 1st or 2nd 41 out of the past 74 seasons.
WOS92 Posted October 21, 2007 Report Posted October 21, 2007 PN-G looks impressive over the years!Permian is still the class of the all-time winning percentage, though WO-S doesn't look like we're sneaking into that top spot on a "high percentage/low total games" basis anymore. A few of the top teams have way fewer games than we do.
KFDM COOP Posted October 21, 2007 Report Posted October 21, 2007 Nope... WO-S still has it....Highest All-Time Winning Percentages Statewide among the 1018 active 11-man UIL programs(includes all games played through October 10th, 2007)1. 78.65% - West Orange-Stark 273-73-32. 78.12% - El Paso Chapin 50-14-03. 77.80% - Odessa Permian 446-123-124. 76.94% - Houston Yates 361-104-125. 75.61% - Southlake Carroll 402-127-86. 75.28% - Austin Westlake 336-108-77. 74.57% - Dallas Carter 343-114-98. 73.56% - Highland Park 689-239-279. 73.43% - El Paso Franklin 105-38-010. 72.32% - Pflugerville Connally 81-31-011. 72.15% - Arlington Lamar 295-112-612. 70.16% - Converse Judson 383-160-1013. 69.96% - Austin Reagan 331-139-1114. 69.57% - La Marque 498-213-1715. 69.35% - Mansfield Summit 43-19-016. 69.24% - San Antonio Clark 226-99-517. 69.04% - Amarillo 696-306-2218. 68.65% - Plano 687-301-4719. 68.36% - Euless Trinity 306-140-620. 68.18% - Lewisville Hebron 60-28-021. 68.00% - Celina 484-223-1822. 67.96% - Temple 672-303-5223. 67.86% - Waco (Consolidated) 170-80-224. 67.74% - Hondo 626-290-3125. 67.58% - Ranger 577-268-34 Thanks
WOS87 Posted October 21, 2007 Author Report Posted October 21, 2007 PN-G also shared the district title in 2004. The list shows 3rd place. That's what the bold red indicates (shared title). The 3rd place indicates they lost the tiebreakers that determined the playoff seed and were considered the 3rd place team from the district entering the playoffs.
Recommended Posts