OJ’s Lawyer to the Rescue!

[UT alum]

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

[baddog]

15 minutes ago, UT alum said:

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it?

[UT alum]

4 minutes ago, baddog said:

We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it?

No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit!

[baddog]

“Get another guilty one off”? What does that say..... to the one who likes to mince words?

[stevenash]

59 minutes ago, UT alum said:

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

No way will Trump get off.  The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz.

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

UT, out of the 2 articles of impeachment,  which of the two reach the level required by the Constitution for impeachment?

[Godzilla]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it?

 

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit!

You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too 

[NetCat]

1 minute ago, Godzilla said:

 

You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too 

This^

[baddog]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit!

The lawyer who got OJ off by making it a racial trial instead of murder was Johnnie Cochran, and he’s dead.

[baddog]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser?

[stevenash]

32 minutes ago, baddog said:

Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser?

Michael Avenatti was not available.

[UT alum]

5 hours ago, stevenash said:

No way will Trump get off.  The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz.

Whaaaa.......?

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser?

To hear trump tell it, he doesn’t even need a lawyer because all was “perfect”. Besides, the prosecution is all House Members first, lawyers second. Not exactly a team of wolves. Dershowitz is a wolf. Ken Starr kind of stumps me, though. That so-and-so prosecutes Clinton for one blowie, then has to resign as President of Baylor U when all that sex coverup with Briles happened. He’s a freakin’ joke.

[Reagan]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

3 hours ago, Godzilla said:

 

You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too 

Enlighten me as to the two ways you think I’m arguing?

[baddog]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

To hear trump tell it, he doesn’t even need a lawyer because all was “perfect”. Besides, the prosecution is all House Members first, lawyers second. Not exactly a team of wolves. Dershowitz is a wolf. Ken Starr kind of stumps me, though. That so-and-so prosecutes Clinton for one blowie, then has to resign as President of Baylor U when all that sex coverup with Briles happened. He’s a freakin’ joke.

Everyone deserves and needs legal representation. Even Perry Mason represented nothing but innocent people.

[Godzilla]

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

Enlighten me as to the two ways you think I’m arguing?

You're pointing out irony.

But you say "alleged guilt," but also that the lawyer "is going to get another guilty one off" 

[stevenash]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

Whaaaa.......?

Illustrating absurdity by being absurd.

[baddog]

 

[LumRaiderFan]

more TDS on display 

[Hagar]

On 1/17/2020 at 12:04 PM, stevenash said:

No way will Trump get off.  The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz.

This might be the funniest post I’ve seen in a long time.  😂😂😂😂😄😄

[Hagar]

On 1/17/2020 at 11:04 AM, UT alum said:

You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off.

Alum, your post reminds me of the recent trouble at the Iraqi Embassy, and the Dems that said, “Trump’s having his Benghazi”, not realizing they were implying that Obama’s Benghazi was a cluster fudge.  That’s something they’d been denying.  TDS does strange things to a person.  I hope you seek professional help...   😂😂😂😂😂😂

[stevenash]

Only problem is the professional help would likely come in the form of a far left psychiatrist.

[Hagar]

Personally, based on the (lack of) evidence from the Dems, I know a local lawyer who could confirm Trump’s innocence.   When WAPO slams Schiff, you know he’s lying.  This was back in October.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[baddog]

3 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Personally, based on the (lack of) evidence from the Dems, I know a local lawyer who could confirm Trump’s innocence.   When WAPO slams Schiff, you know he’s lying.  This was back in October.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Trump should sue them all for slander.