UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, UT alum said: You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, baddog said: We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it? No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 “Get another guilty one off”? What does that say..... to the one who likes to mince words? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 59 minutes ago, UT alum said: You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. No way will Trump get off. The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz. Reagan and Hagar 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 hours ago, UT alum said: You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. UT, out of the 2 articles of impeachment, which of the two reach the level required by the Constitution for impeachment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 hours ago, baddog said: We’re the haters but you just said OJ was guilty. Which is it? 2 hours ago, UT alum said: No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit! You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too NetCat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NetCat Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Godzilla said: You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too This^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 3 hours ago, UT alum said: No, no. I’ve seen more than a few references to OJ’s alleged guilt on these forums. So, I greatly relish this spectacular display of irony. If the transcript fits, you must acquit! The lawyer who got OJ off by making it a racial trial instead of murder was Johnnie Cochran, and he’s dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 3 hours ago, UT alum said: You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 32 minutes ago, baddog said: Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser? Michael Avenatti was not available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 5 hours ago, stevenash said: No way will Trump get off. The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz. Whaaaa.......? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 hours ago, baddog said: Hey smart guy, imagine you have all of these hungry wolves trying to rip you to shreds in a trial, who are you going to hire, an ambulance chaser? To hear trump tell it, he doesn’t even need a lawyer because all was “perfect”. Besides, the prosecution is all House Members first, lawyers second. Not exactly a team of wolves. Dershowitz is a wolf. Ken Starr kind of stumps me, though. That so-and-so prosecutes Clinton for one blowie, then has to resign as President of Baylor U when all that sex coverup with Briles happened. He’s a freakin’ joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted January 17, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 3 hours ago, Godzilla said: You can't have it both ways alum. I get that's what you're trying to argue as well but you have to answer too Enlighten me as to the two ways you think I’m arguing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 1 hour ago, UT alum said: To hear trump tell it, he doesn’t even need a lawyer because all was “perfect”. Besides, the prosecution is all House Members first, lawyers second. Not exactly a team of wolves. Dershowitz is a wolf. Ken Starr kind of stumps me, though. That so-and-so prosecutes Clinton for one blowie, then has to resign as President of Baylor U when all that sex coverup with Briles happened. He’s a freakin’ joke. Everyone deserves and needs legal representation. Even Perry Mason represented nothing but innocent people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 4 hours ago, UT alum said: Enlighten me as to the two ways you think I’m arguing? You're pointing out irony. But you say "alleged guilt," but also that the lawyer "is going to get another guilty one off" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 5 hours ago, UT alum said: Whaaaa.......? Illustrating absurdity by being absurd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 more TDS on display Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 On 1/17/2020 at 12:04 PM, stevenash said: No way will Trump get off. The "evidence" is too compelling and, additionally, Adam Schiff will overpower Dershowitz. This might be the funniest post I’ve seen in a long time. 😂😂😂😂😄😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 On 1/17/2020 at 11:04 AM, UT alum said: You know it’s bad if trump has to get OJ’s lawyer to pull his fat from the fire! Chew on that for me, OJ haters. Dershowitz is gonna get another guilty one off. Alum, your post reminds me of the recent trouble at the Iraqi Embassy, and the Dems that said, “Trump’s having his Benghazi”, not realizing they were implying that Obama’s Benghazi was a cluster fudge. That’s something they’d been denying. TDS does strange things to a person. I hope you seek professional help... 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 Only problem is the professional help would likely come in the form of a far left psychiatrist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 Personally, based on the (lack of) evidence from the Dems, I know a local lawyer who could confirm Trump’s innocence. When WAPO slams Schiff, you know he’s lying. This was back in October. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Hagar said: Personally, based on the (lack of) evidence from the Dems, I know a local lawyer who could confirm Trump’s innocence. When WAPO slams Schiff, you know he’s lying. This was back in October. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Trump should sue them all for slander. Hagar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.