Attn: UT Alum, Big Girl, and associates

[Godzilla]

5 hours ago, NetCat said:

Why not answer the question instead of asking another one? 

I don't know if she can 

[UT alum]

22 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

 

A woman becomes pregnant not the man. Having sex is not the crime nor is creating a human being.  The crime is killing that human being.

Do you re read what you write before you hit “send/post”

So is it safe to say by your logic that if a woman didn’t want an abortion but the man did he could force that Since he was part of creating the life.

He could volunteer to take the child. To pay child support if it were born, or yet, raise it instead of the mother. 

[UT alum]

22 hours ago, baddog said:

Well.........there’s ONE!

I sure am glad you don’t throw stones. We are all sinners so the self-righteous route doesn’t impress me.

I have never questioned anyone’s faith in here.

[UT alum]

22 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So is late term abortion...you good with that?

Only if mother’s health is endangered. I believe other than that the decision should be able to be made in the first trimester.

[UT alum]

19 hours ago, Godzilla said:

Immigration has been restricted before many times. That's what he said, are you ignoring that or do you think it didn't happen? 

I cited examples of it happening in the post, man. 

[UT alum]

19 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Just because the SCOTUS says it's not murder?  Some day there will be One that will change your mind, as well as those that had abortions and those that performed them.  The One I speak of is who you need to bow to.

I do. Why don’t you leave eternal decision making to Him? 

[baddog]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I do. Why don’t you leave eternal decision making to Him? 

Same question should be posed to the woman pondering abortion.

[5GallonBucket]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Only if mother’s health is endangered. I believe other than that the decision should be able to be made in the first trimester.

Heart is beating in 1st trimester 

[5GallonBucket]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

He could volunteer to take the child. To pay child support if it were born, or yet, raise it instead of the mother. 

I agree and so should the mother

[NetCat]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

I cited examples of it happening in the post, man. 

Did you? 

[LumRaiderFan]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

Only if mother’s health is endangered. I believe other than that the decision should be able to be made in the first trimester.

So it would be unethical to kill a baby after the first trimester but before that, no problem?  Is it not a baby in the first trimester?

 

[BS Wildcats]

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

I do. Why don’t you leave eternal decision making to Him? 

That's what I said, right?

[UT alum]

9 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Heart is beating in 1st trimester 

Look, you asked, I answered. I know the heart is beating first trimester.

[UT alum]

6 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So it would be unethical to kill a baby after the first trimester but before that, no problem?  Is it not a baby in the first trimester?

 

It’s not a baby until it’s born.

[BS Wildcats]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

It’s not a baby until it’s born.

Bull💩!!!!

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

It’s not a baby until it’s born.

Jeremiah 1:5 

⁵ “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
 

[NetCat]

7 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Jeremiah 1:5 

⁵ “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
 

Don't bother, he'll throw scripture back at you that is out of context. 

[LumRaiderFan]

42 minutes ago, NetCat said:

Don't bother, he'll throw scripture back at you that is out of context. 

Most likely.

[5GallonBucket]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

It’s not a baby until it’s born.

Wow. 
anything to fit the narrative

it s not a baby?????  I know UT education is liberal but my goodness

 

[UT alum]

On 2/19/2020 at 8:53 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

Wow. 
anything to fit the narrative

it s not a baby?????  I know UT education is liberal but my goodness

 

I try and fit my narrative to the law.

[5GallonBucket]

3 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I try and fit my narrative to the law.

When man’s law goes against THE LAW. You may want to reconsider.

 

[5GallonBucket]

5 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I try and fit my narrative to the law.

So does thAt mean no matter what law man comes up with next.... no matter how grotesque or morally wrong it is it’s ok/right?.....because man says so

[NetCat]

4 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

So does thAt mean no matter what law man comes up with next.... no matter how grotesque or morally wrong it is it’s ok/right?.....because man says so

That sounds like what @UT alum is saying. The law is more important to him than morals. Tell me if I'm wrong but that's how you come off on here @UT alum.

[BS Wildcats]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I try and fit my narrative to the law.

Common sense should play a role at some point.  Not calling a baby, a baby, until it is born is ridiculous.  You have to wonder if these people have ever looked at an image of a BABY while it is still in the womb.  But, you still say it is not a baby until born.  How is that?

[5GallonBucket]

3 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Common sense should play a role at some point.  Not calling a baby, a baby, until it is born is ridiculous.  You have to wonder if these people have ever looked at an image of a BABY while it is still in the womb.  But, you still say it is not a baby until born.  How is that?

Doesn’t t fit the narrative