Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

So does thAt mean no matter what law man comes up with next.... no matter how grotesque or morally wrong it is it’s ok/right?.....because man says so

No. Denying food to the hungry and medicine to the sick are grotesque policies/laws, but you are as adept supporting them as I am supporting a woman’s right to choose.

Posted
20 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No. Denying food to the hungry and medicine to the sick are grotesque policies/laws, but you are as adept supporting them as I am supporting a woman’s right to choose.

Propaganda

Posted
34 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No. Denying food to the hungry and medicine to the sick are grotesque policies/laws, but you are as adept supporting them as I am supporting a woman’s right to choose.

UT- Do tell:  just how long have the hungry been denied food and the sick been denied medicine?  Let me guess, did it begin in 2016?

Posted
8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

UT- Do tell:  just how long have the hungry been denied food and the sick been denied medicine?  Let me guess, did it begin in 2016?

I bet it happened in 2000-08 too.

Posted
35 minutes ago, stevenash said:

UT- Do tell:  just how long have the hungry been denied food and the sick been denied medicine?  Let me guess, did it begin in 2016?

 

26 minutes ago, NetCat said:

I bet it happened in 2000-08 too.

That should frame it up for everyone. Lmao.

Posted
On 2/13/2020 at 7:01 PM, UT alum said:

It’s the woman’s choice. Get over it.

Not by Roe v. Wade. That decision said only in the first trimester. 
 

13 weeks in and that right stops. 

Posted
On 2/24/2020 at 3:46 AM, tvc184 said:

Not by Roe v. Wade. That decision said only in the first trimester. 
 

13 weeks in and that right stops. 

A choice is a choice. I said previously that I agreed with a first trimester limit, giving the woman adequate time to make that choice.

Posted
On 2/22/2020 at 8:58 AM, stevenash said:

UT- Do tell:  just how long have the hungry been denied food and the sick been denied medicine?  Let me guess, did it begin in 2016?

The latest relative executive order - remember how you all used to hate those when someone else was using them  - is kicking 700,000 off the rolls soon. So,no, I’d say starting in 2020. Pre existing conditions also denied affordable healthcare for millons, and liar-in-Chief wants to scrap that, too.

Posted
On 2/22/2020 at 8:44 AM, NetCat said:

Propaganda

Like I told Nash, Trump’s throwing 700,000 off food stamps soon, and he wants to end, or at least restrict preexisting conditions for healthcare. Whose propaganda is that? That’s truth, pal.

Posted

house votes. Dems won. 220 to 187

Dems rejected legislation brought by republicans that would’ve required medical attention to babies that survived abortion.
 

party Of sickos.....mentally jacked up. Scumbags

oh and let me mention also that Chicago released a previously deported felon who went on to sexually assault a toddler.

my oh my what a bunch of screwed up individuals that are in power.

i can say so much more.... but what’s the use.

 

I don’t know how to post sites 

Posted
On 2/11/2020 at 8:44 AM, UT alum said:

You do understand that sanctuary cities are not federal policy? Cities cannot overrule the Federal government. They are largely symbolic representations of compassion towards the downtrodden. I know you’ll have a field day with that one. Go for it.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Sanctuary city doing a great job of looking out for the downtrodden.

Posted
10 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

Sanctuary city doing a great job of looking out for the downtrodden.

When anecdotes replace statistics, it’s like superstition replacing science. Nothing good will come from it.

Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

When anecdotes replace statistics, it’s like superstition replacing science. Nothing good will come from it.

So you think it's ok? What that guy did to the toddler? How can you say that and still profess to be Christian? 

Posted
7 minutes ago, UT alum said:

White supremacist kills person 3 months after prison release. Lock up all white supremacists?

Is anybody saying otherwise? And that's not what was being said, it's about criminals. Not a blanket lock up all illegals, deport them. 

Posted
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

You must remember that whataboutism applies to all conservatives while the left is allowed to practice "selective whataboutism"

Whatchou’ talkin’ about, Nash?

Using a whatabout and making a comparison are, albeit nuanced, different. Whatabouts are deflections used to avoid answering for the subject’s actions.

Comparisons are just as the name implies.  I’m not deflecting from the actions of the alien criminal. I’m just applying the same logic to two separate incidents.

I recognize that nuance doesn’t carry much weight in the scorched earth realm of zero sum politics, but that does not negate the fact that it is needed to make complex decisions.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...